Complete Phase I foundations (SOUL-WP-0002)

Integrate research/foundations notes 001–005 into Terminology, Claims,
bibliography, concept notes, thought experiments, and open questions. Write
phase-i-foundations-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0002, and mark SOUL-WP-0003
ready for interaction research.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
parent 28cf824d31
commit 3fbcca209d
20 changed files with 3724 additions and 367 deletions

View file

@ -1,33 +1,64 @@
# Being
**Status:** provisional
**See also:** `Terminology.md`, RQ1, H1H2, H7
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
**See also:** `Terminology.md`, RQ1, H1H2, H7, RN-001003
## Working definition
## Working definition (v0.2)
A **Being** is a sufficiently coherent and persistent informational system that:
> An **autonomous informational individual** exhibiting sufficiently coherent
> dimensions of **personhood** to become an **addressable** entity that is
> **recognized** by other Beings as a persistent counterpart.
1. maintains a distinguishable boundary between itself and its environment,
2. can be instantiated as an identifiable and addressable entity,
3. exhibits meaningful continuity across time,
4. constructs models that support adaptive interaction,
5. and is recognized by other beings as a persistent counterpart with which
relationships can be established.
```text
Being ≈ AutonomousIndividuality + Personhood + Addressability + Recognition
```
Beinghood ≈ **internal closure + continuity + external recognition**
Not arithmetic — four requirement *families*.
## Notes for research
## Autonomous individuality profile (substrate)
From RN-002 (renamed in RN-003 so autonomy alone is not labeled “Being”):
| Code | Dimension |
|---|---|
| B1 | Individuability |
| B2 | Temporal integrity |
| B3 | Constitutive integration |
| B4 | Self-maintenance participation |
| B5 | Endogenous viability |
| B6 | Adaptive regulation |
| B7 | Interactional asymmetry |
| B8 | Identity-preserving transformation |
Treat as a **profile**, not eight Boolean gates.
## Stack
```text
Informational process
→ Individuated system
→ Autonomous individual
→ (+ personhood, addressability, recognition) → Being
→ (+ reciprocal relations) → Social Being
```
## Notes
- Not restricted to biological organisms; not automatic for every computational process.
- Prefer degree of systemic coherence and recognition over a pure binary.
- Distinguish systemic existence from social recognition of existence.
- Autonomy-only reading yields false positives (self-maintaining daemon, control plane).
- Personhood-only reading yields false positives (stateless person-like chatbots as APE).
- Distinguish systemic individuality from social recognition of existence.
## Crosswalk (to fill)
## Crosswalk
| Adjacent term | Similarity | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| autopoietic system | | |
| autonomous agent | | |
| person | | |
| individual | | |
| operationally closed system | | |
| autopoietic system | self-maintaining organization | biological autopoiesis not required; contested beyond life |
| autonomous agent | multi-criteria agency | agent often functional; Being requires personhood layer |
| person | personhood layer | personhood ≠ full Beinghood |
| individual | individuability | may lack autonomy/personhood/recognition |
| operationally closed system | closure | closure alone insufficient for “someone” |
## Sources
`research/foundations/001-*.md`, `002-*.md`, `003-beinghood-stress-test.md`