Complete Phase I foundations (SOUL-WP-0002)
Integrate research/foundations notes 001–005 into Terminology, Claims, bibliography, concept notes, thought experiments, and open questions. Write phase-i-foundations-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0002, and mark SOUL-WP-0003 ready for interaction research.
This commit is contained in:
parent
28cf824d31
commit
3fbcca209d
20 changed files with 3724 additions and 367 deletions
|
|
@ -1,25 +1,47 @@
|
|||
# Identity
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** under review
|
||||
**See also:** RQ5, H6, thought experiments TE-02–TE-05, TE-08
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** RQ5, H6, TE-02–TE-05, TE-08, RN-004, RN-005
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
## Disambiguation
|
||||
|
||||
**Identity** concerns what makes temporally separated manifestations instances of
|
||||
the **same Being**.
|
||||
| Question | Soul Frame term |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Same entity over time? | **Identity** (numerical / reidentification) |
|
||||
| What continues? | **Continuity** (may branch) |
|
||||
| Historical relatedness after branch? | **Lineage** |
|
||||
| What is it like? | **Characterization** (narrative/character) |
|
||||
|
||||
Working hypothesis: identity is **substrate-independent but continuity-dependent**.
|
||||
Replacing the technical Actor need not replace the Being if sufficient continuity
|
||||
is preserved.
|
||||
Identity ≠ Continuity ≠ Lineage ≠ Character.
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuity candidates
|
||||
## Core formulation
|
||||
|
||||
- informational continuity
|
||||
- psychological / memory continuity
|
||||
- narrative identity
|
||||
- relational continuity (recognition and relationships)
|
||||
- bodily / embodiment continuity (where applicable)
|
||||
> A Being continues not because its state remains the same, but because its
|
||||
> changes remain part of one appropriately connected history of self-individuation.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> When that history branches, identity becomes lineage.
|
||||
|
||||
## Hard cases
|
||||
## Continuity profile (constitutive dimensions)
|
||||
|
||||
Forks, merges, backups, multi-manifestation, amnesia, gradual component replacement.
|
||||
Causal, organizational, psychological, autobiographical/narrative, normative,
|
||||
relational.
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchors / evidence (not constitutive alone):** provenance, address, substrate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Topology labels
|
||||
|
||||
`CONTINUOUS | DEGRADED | UNCERTAIN | SUCCESSOR | FORKED | RECONSTRUCTED | USURPED | TERMINATED`
|
||||
|
||||
## Implications for artificial systems
|
||||
|
||||
- Actor/Body replacement can preserve identity (substrate independence + continuity dependence).
|
||||
- Sameness of data is not sameness of Being.
|
||||
- Forks require governance; perfect copy while original continues yields FORKED lineage.
|
||||
- Ghosts default to authorized succession/representation, not automatic numerical identity.
|
||||
- Explicit identity governance is required because state is inspectable, copyable, editable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/004-identity-and-continuity.md`
|
||||
`research/foundations/ResearchNote005-IdentityContinuityStressTest.md`
|
||||
Locke; Parfit; Olson SEP; process identity literature
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue