Complete Deppert paper dialogue: Evolution des Bewusstseins

Lock the Unitariertag 2009 PDF from Downloads/blog, reconstruct claims D-01–D-29,
and write comparative commentary. Main result: strong support for open-system
viability and nested life, serious challenge from defining Bewusstsein as
survival-function coupling (false friend for Soul Frame consciousness/Mind).
Feed findings into Claims, OpenQuestions, Terminology, and bibliography.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-12 03:32:14 +02:00
parent c1f4cd37d2
commit 6ccd5e2a6a
11 changed files with 468 additions and 109 deletions

View file

@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ addressability + recognition). Still open:
- Weighting and thresholds of B1B8
- Observer-relative individuation without arbitrariness
- Nested levels (colony, collective, multi-Body)
- **Deppert dialogue:** are *kulturelle Lebewesen* (firms, states, clubs) living
beings in SF terms, or only nested systems with Social Beinghood filters?
(See paper-dialogues/001-deppert…)
## RQ2 — What constitutes personhood?
@ -39,6 +42,11 @@ architecture adopted provisionally. Remaining:
- Recursive depth for personhood (OQ-056)
- When common ground becomes collective Mind (OQ-067)
**Paper dialogue (Deppert 2009):** strong false-friend risk — Deppert defines
*Bewusstsein* as coupling of survival functions. SF must not absorb that as
“consciousness” or as Mind wholesale. See
`research/paper-dialogues/001-deppert-evolution-des-bewusstseins/`.
## RQ4 — What constitutes a Soul?
**Phase VI status:** relational operationalization **supported as direction** (H5);