- T01: research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md — reject universal weights; necessity core (B1/B3), claim-relative P minimal profiles, continuity configuration classes with causal privilege; OpenQuestions RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets positioned - T02: research/coverage-matrix.md — nine INTENT entity types under the full vocabulary; success criterion verdict: pass with two strain points - T03: concepts/soul.md packaging resolved (enacted vs residual Soul); RQ4 no longer carries a paper-critical open item - SCOPE.md work-surface bullets updated; workplan finished Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: sonnet Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6
4.7 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | origin | origin_ref | owner | topic_slug | priority | created | updated | depends_on | state_hub_workstream_id | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOUL-WP-0011 | workplan | Phase X — Sufficiency/weighting position, success-criterion coverage matrix, and Soul packaging | agents | soul-frame | finished | assessment | history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md | claude | soul-frame | medium | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-28 |
|
7255091a-ae5b-5e09-b891-cac50b56ecd7 |
SOUL-WP-0011 — Phase X: Sufficiency, Coverage, and Soul Packaging
Goal
Close the three gaps the 2026-09-28 scope-vs-intent assessment
(history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md) ranked as most relevant
and addressable now:
- G1 — the framework has no stated position on weighting/sufficiency for its B-, P-, and continuity profiles, though thresholds are load-bearing in Beinghood v0.2 and across the TE catalog.
- G2 — INTENT's success criterion (one vocabulary across nine reference entity types, with meaningful distinctions) has never been exercised as an explicit test.
- G3 — Soul packaging (relations vs consequences vs both) is the last remaining paper-critical open item (RQ4).
Tasks
T01 — Sufficiency and weighting position paper
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "f4e4b427-4abb-52ce-ba29-a7360d6bf7c7"
Write research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md: a principled
position on how (or whether) B1–B8, P1–P12, and the six continuity
channels aggregate into sufficiency judgments ("enough personhood for
Beinghood v0.2", "CONTINUOUS vs DEGRADED"). A principled refusal of
universal weights (context-of-claim relativity) is an acceptable outcome
if argued; silence is not. Must state consequences for Beinghood v0.2
phrasing and the TE working judgments that lean on thresholds.
Done when: the note exists, takes one defended position, and
OpenQuestions.md RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets reference it.
T02 — Success-criterion coverage matrix
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "3277e2fa-2e5b-51ff-b332-937d920add1d"
Write research/coverage-matrix.md: apply the full vocabulary (B-profile,
P-profile, continuity channels, addressability/recognition,
Agent/Sp./Gh. descriptors) to all nine INTENT reference entity types in
one matrix, with per-entity notes on where the vocabulary strains.
Distinctions must be meaningful: every pair of entity types must differ
on at least one dimension, stated explicitly or derivable from the matrix.
Done when: the matrix covers all nine types, strain points are named,
and the note gives an explicit pass/partial verdict on the success
criterion, cross-referenced from INTENT.md's success-criterion section
readers via SCOPE.md.
T03 — Soul packaging resolution
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T03
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "44e94404-219d-58cf-85e7-7d9dcd95190c"
Resolve RQ4's remainder: does "Soul" package relations, consequences
(persistent influence), or both — and how does Cluster D inheritance
(Gh. inheriting Soul-relational structure without identity) survive the
chosen packaging? Update concepts/soul.md with the outcome and mark the
RQ4 remainder resolved or narrowed in OpenQuestions.md.
Done when: concepts/soul.md states the packaging position with
rationale, and RQ4's "still open (paper-critical)" block reflects it.
Outcome (2026-09-28)
- T01 —
research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md: universal cardinal weights rejected with argument; structured-qualitative scheme adopted (B necessity core B1·B3, claim-relative P minimal profiles, continuity configuration classes with causal privilege). RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets now reference it. Composite-index building declared out of scope by position (constrains decision 0401cf28). - T02 —
research/coverage-matrix.md: all nine INTENT reference entity types profiled under the full vocabulary; pairwise distinctness verified. Success-criterion verdict: pass, with two strain points (distributed AI level-addressing; radically non-human individuation/P10) already tracked as RQ1/RQ8 residuals. - T03 — Soul packaging resolved in
concepts/soul.md: both relations and consequences, as enacted vs residual modes of one dimension; Cluster D inheritance named as residual Soul re-enacted under authority. RQ4 block updated; no paper-critical open item remains on RQ4.
Residuals: none opened — the coverage-matrix strain points and the EPHEMERAL null-class observation stay tracked in existing registers (RQ1/RQ8, matrix §3) as agenda, not actionable leftovers; the Cluster D depth and fork questions remain pre-existing RQ4 residuals.