soul-frame/workplans/SOUL-WP-0010-metrics-and-personhood-mapping.md
tegwick 3906429ed6 Fix invalid flavor on SOUL-WP-0009/0010; activate SOUL-WP-0010
flavor: research was not a recognized value (fix-consistency C-36:
expected planning|implementation|refactoring|extension|residual). Both
workplans are explicitly residuals of their parent workplans, so flavor:
residual is correct. Reviewed SOUL-WP-0010 against current repo state
(concepts/personhood.md, research/metrics-scoping-note.md,
research/law-governance/sp-gh-legal-gap-sketch.md all present as
referenced) and promoted proposed -> active to begin implementation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 136745@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2e334b58-ed31-48ed-8156-d09f8ed0781f
2026-09-28 16:26:32 +02:00

99 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
id: SOUL-WP-0010
type: workplan
title: "Phase IX — P-axis enumeration, metrics instruments, and moral/legal companion line (slice 1)"
domain: agents
repo: soul-frame
status: active
flavor: residual
owner: grok
topic_slug: soul-frame
priority: low
created: "2026-09-28"
updated: "2026-09-28"
depends_on:
- SOUL-WP-0009
state_hub_workstream_id: "3f3998c6-038e-5cad-857c-26d422f88163"
---
# SOUL-WP-0010 — Phase IX: Metrics and Personhood Mapping (Slice 1)
## Goal
Residual of SOUL-WP-0009. Two of its completed tasks (T04 metrics scoping,
T05 moral/legal charter) each recommended follow-on work that is multi-step
and should not sit only as prose in their source notes:
- `research/metrics-scoping-note.md` found the B-axis (P1–P12) blocked on
enumeration, and recommended prioritizing instrument development for
constitutive integration (B3) and psychological continuity.
- `research/law-governance/moral-legal-personhood-charter.md` recommended a
first narrow slice ("legal personhood precedent survey only") rather than
opening the whole moral/legal question at once.
This workplan bundles both as a first slice. **Left `proposed`** — not
reviewed against current repo state or started; needs Bernd's go-ahead
before promotion to `ready`/`active`, same as SOUL-WP-0009 was.
## Depends on
- **SOUL-WP-0009** Phase VIII research agenda (finished 2026-09-28)
## Tasks
### T01 — Enumerate P1–P12 explicitly
```task
id: SOUL-WP-0010-T01
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "598c52c1-5902-541f-bff0-78a8700ce4ed"
```
`concepts/personhood.md` currently references P1–P12 as a profile without
itemizing each code the way `concepts/being.md` itemizes B1–B8. Write out
the twelve dimensions explicitly, sourced from Phase III personhood
literature (Dennett cluster conditions; trait/social-cognitive personality
psychology).
**Done when:** `concepts/personhood.md` has a P1–P12 table matching B1–B8's
specificity.
---
### T02 — Instrument scoping for constitutive integration and psychological continuity
```task
id: SOUL-WP-0010-T02
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "1ae4434f-8603-5c71-aa59-add71bff24aa"
```
Per `research/metrics-scoping-note.md`'s recommendation, scope (not build)
candidate instruments for B3 (constitutive integration) and psychological
continuity specifically — the two dimensions doing the most argumentative
work across the thought-experiment catalog with no existing metric.
**Done when:** a follow-up note names at least one candidate operational
approach per dimension, or explicitly states none is currently viable.
---
### T03 — Legal personhood precedent survey (first slice only)
```task
id: SOUL-WP-0010-T03
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "f29ae5a5-0ede-57c2-9963-50580f5cf6db"
```
Per the moral/legal charter's non-goals, take **only** the first scoped
slice: a survey of legal personhood precedent (corporate personhood, animal
welfare/rights law, AI legal-personality proposals) extending
`research/law-governance/sp-gh-legal-gap-sketch.md`. Do not attempt moral
status or the non-derivation statement (charter items 2–3) in this slice.
**Done when:** a precedent survey note exists, explicitly scoped to legal
personhood only, cross-referenced from the charter.