soul-frame/SCOPE.md
tegwick 5a8a5a2d2d Update SCOPE to actual repo state; add scope-vs-intent gap assessment; open SOUL-WP-0011
- SCOPE.md now reflects Phases I-IX complete, paper draft with decided
  pathway, companion line, and metrics groundwork; current work surface
  and sharpened out-of-scope table
- history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md assesses state against
  INTENT's six determinations and success criterion; gap register G1-G7,
  ranking G1 (sufficiency/weighting), G2 (coverage matrix), G3 (Soul
  packaging) as most relevant addressable gaps
- SOUL-WP-0011 opened to address G1-G3 (three tasks)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6
2026-09-28 20:38:53 +02:00

94 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# SCOPE
> This file helps you quickly understand what this repository is about,
> when it is relevant, and when it is not.
> It is intentionally lightweight and may be incomplete.
>
> Aspirational charter: `INTENT.md` · Research agenda: `ResearchProgram.md` ·
> Conceptual draft: `SoulFrameIntroduction.md` ·
> Scope-vs-intent gap assessment: `history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md`
---
## One-liner
A systems-theoretic research program and conceptual framework for person-like
informational beings (Body = Action, Mind = Model, Soul = Relation) — through
its foundational phases and holding a research-grounded paper draft.
---
## Core Idea
Soul Frame develops a small, coherent vocabulary for describing biological,
artificial, fictionalized, and potentially non-human **Beings** as interacting
informational systems — without requiring a solved theory of consciousness, and
without silently equating descriptive personhood with moral or legal status.
Central question:
> **When does an informational system become someone that another someone can know?**
---
## What the repo actually holds (as of 2026-09-28)
Phases I–IX are complete (SOUL-WP-0001 … SOUL-WP-0010, all finished):
- **Concept set** — 13 working definitions in `concepts/` plus three criteria
documents (`concepts/criteria/`), including itemized B1–B8 (autonomous
individuality) and P1–P12 (descriptive personhood) profiles
- **Research instruments** — `Terminology.md`, `Claims.md` (H1–H10, all
supported/revised through phase review), `OpenQuestions.md` (RQ1–RQ8 with
working answers; itemized OQ registers), `ThoughtExperiments.md` (TE-01–09+
with working judgments)
- **Literature base** — `sources/bibliography.md` (SF-R### ledger),
discipline-organized maps under `research/` for all 13 workstreams touched
so far, five phase syntheses plus `research/research-synthesis.md`
- **Paper** — `paper/draft.md`: first research-grounded draft, adversarially
reviewed (SOUL-WP-0009), publication pathway decided: internal circulation
as **paper-one for coulomb-research**, then pre-print → journal
- **Companion line (moral/legal)** — charter
(`research/law-governance/moral-legal-personhood-charter.md`) plus first
slice executed (legal personhood precedent survey); items 2–4 unstarted
- **Metrics groundwork** — measurability scoping across all axes
(`research/metrics-scoping-note.md`) and instrument scoping for B3 +
psychological continuity; instrument *build* is founder-gated (open hub
decision `0401cf28`)
## In Scope (current work surface)
- Refining weighting/sufficiency questions for the B-, P-, and continuity
profiles (RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 residuals; paper §17 item 2)
- Exercising INTENT's success criterion: applying the full vocabulary across
the nine reference entity types with meaningful distinctions
- Resolving paper-critical packaging questions (e.g. Soul: relations vs
consequences, RQ4 remainder)
- Further companion-line slices (charter items 2–4) and law/governance
deepening — under the charter's own gates
- Instrument development for scoped metrics — only after decision `0401cf28`
is resolved
- Carrying the paper through the coulomb-research internal-circulation stage
## Out of Scope
| Concern | Belongs elsewhere |
| ------- | ----------------- |
| Production agent runtime / harness | agent-harness, activity-core, runtime repos |
| LLM provider routing and tooling | llm-connect, related infra |
| Claiming to solve consciousness | philosophy programs; not a gate here |
| Silent moral/legal personhood claims | companion line only (charter-gated); no premature derivation |
| Shipping product features as primary deliverable | downstream architecture repos after conceptual clarity |
| "Practical architecture for artificial beings" (INTENT det. 6b) | downstream repos; conceptual clarity feeds it, this repo does not build it |
---
## Workplan prefix
`SOUL-WP`
## Domain / hub
- **Domain:** `agents`
- **Repo slug:** `soul-frame`
- **Secondary:** `infotech` (conceptual/platform adjacency)