soul-frame/workplans/SOUL-WP-0011-sufficiency-coverage-and-soul-packaging.md
tegwick 5a8a5a2d2d Update SCOPE to actual repo state; add scope-vs-intent gap assessment; open SOUL-WP-0011
- SCOPE.md now reflects Phases I-IX complete, paper draft with decided
  pathway, companion line, and metrics groundwork; current work surface
  and sharpened out-of-scope table
- history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md assesses state against
  INTENT's six determinations and success criterion; gap register G1-G7,
  ranking G1 (sufficiency/weighting), G2 (coverage matrix), G3 (Soul
  packaging) as most relevant addressable gaps
- SOUL-WP-0011 opened to address G1-G3 (three tasks)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6
2026-09-28 20:38:53 +02:00

96 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
id: SOUL-WP-0011
type: workplan
title: "Phase X — Sufficiency/weighting position, success-criterion coverage matrix, and Soul packaging"
domain: agents
repo: soul-frame
status: active
origin: assessment
origin_ref: history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md
owner: claude
topic_slug: soul-frame
priority: medium
created: "2026-09-28"
updated: "2026-09-28"
depends_on:
- SOUL-WP-0010
---
# SOUL-WP-0011 — Phase X: Sufficiency, Coverage, and Soul Packaging
## Goal
Close the three gaps the 2026-09-28 scope-vs-intent assessment
(`history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md`) ranked as most relevant
and addressable now:
- **G1** — the framework has no stated position on weighting/sufficiency
for its B-, P-, and continuity profiles, though thresholds are
load-bearing in Beinghood v0.2 and across the TE catalog.
- **G2** — INTENT's success criterion (one vocabulary across nine
reference entity types, with meaningful distinctions) has never been
exercised as an explicit test.
- **G3** — Soul packaging (relations vs consequences vs both) is the last
remaining paper-critical open item (RQ4).
## Tasks
### T01 — Sufficiency and weighting position paper
```task
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T01
status: todo
priority: high
```
Write `research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md`: a principled
position on how (or whether) B1–B8, P1–P12, and the six continuity
channels aggregate into sufficiency judgments ("enough personhood for
Beinghood v0.2", "CONTINUOUS vs DEGRADED"). A principled refusal of
universal weights (context-of-claim relativity) is an acceptable outcome
if argued; silence is not. Must state consequences for Beinghood v0.2
phrasing and the TE working judgments that lean on thresholds.
**Done when:** the note exists, takes one defended position, and
`OpenQuestions.md` RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets reference it.
---
### T02 — Success-criterion coverage matrix
```task
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T02
status: todo
priority: high
```
Write `research/coverage-matrix.md`: apply the full vocabulary (B-profile,
P-profile, continuity channels, addressability/recognition,
Agent/Sp./Gh. descriptors) to all nine INTENT reference entity types in
one matrix, with per-entity notes on where the vocabulary strains.
Distinctions must be *meaningful*: every pair of entity types must differ
on at least one dimension, stated explicitly or derivable from the matrix.
**Done when:** the matrix covers all nine types, strain points are named,
and the note gives an explicit pass/partial verdict on the success
criterion, cross-referenced from `INTENT.md`'s success-criterion section
readers via SCOPE.md.
---
### T03 — Soul packaging resolution
```task
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
```
Resolve RQ4's remainder: does "Soul" package relations, consequences
(persistent influence), or both — and how does Cluster D inheritance
(Gh. inheriting Soul-relational structure without identity) survive the
chosen packaging? Update `concepts/soul.md` with the outcome and mark the
RQ4 remainder resolved or narrowed in `OpenQuestions.md`.
**Done when:** `concepts/soul.md` states the packaging position with
rationale, and RQ4's "still open (paper-critical)" block reflects it.