Formalize Sp. evaluation dimensions and Gh. authority/governance; map law gaps without legal conclusions; support H9/H10; confirm TE-07. Write phase-v synthesis, finish SOUL-WP-0006, and mark SOUL-WP-0007 ready.
4.8 KiB
4.8 KiB
Law/Governance Gap Sketch — Spirit & Ghost (Phase V)
Workplan: SOUL-WP-0006-T03
Date: 2026-08-12
Method: Map Soul Frame concepts → existing legal categories → gaps.
Non-goal: Derive legal rights or moral status from philosophical terminology.
No jurisdiction-specific legal advice.
1. Mapping table
| Soul Frame concept | Nearby legal / regulatory categories | Fit | Gaps / tensions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Being (descriptive) | legal person; natural person | poor/direct | Legal personality is fiat/status; not Beinghood v0.2 |
| APE | product, service, software agent | partial | No unified “person-like AI” status |
| Actor | model provider, hoster, deployer roles | good | Liability stacks across Actor layers |
| Persona | branding, avatar, account identity | partial | Account ≠ person; impersonation doctrines |
Spirit (Sp.) |
publicity / personality rights; copyright (corpus); trademark; moral rights (some jurisdictions); parody/fair use (varies) | partial | Public-figure speech vs commercial Sp.; deceased personality rights vary widely |
Ghost (Gh.) |
consent; data protection; estates/inheritance; fiduciary duties; posthumous privacy (uneven); medical/genetic data special regimes | partial | Few statutes for “authorized posthumous agent”; platform ToS dominate |
| Authority / custodian | agent/principal; executor; attorney-in-fact; data controller/processor | partial | No standard Gh. custodianship instrument |
| Provenance | evidence law; audit; digital signatures; record-keeping | partial | Provenance ≠ identity in law either |
| False Ghost / usurpation | impersonation; fraud; right of publicity; deepfake bills (emerging); identity theft (stretch) | partial | Coverage uneven; technical fidelity outruns doctrine |
| Disclosure rules | privacy, confidentiality, professional secrecy | partial | Relationship-specific AI disclosure rarely specified |
| Soul / legacy | estate assets; moral rights; reputation torts; digital assets | weak | Relational/reputational “Soul” not a legal object |
| Recognition (social) | no direct analogue | — | Social Beinghood ≠ legal recognition |
| Fork of Gh. | property copies; license scope; data subject rights | weak | Which instance is authorized? |
2. Sp.-specific legal clusters
- Right of publicity / personality rights — commercial use of name/likeness/voice
- Copyright — training/use of works; output similarity
- Moral rights (where recognized) — attribution, integrity of work
- Defamation / false light — Sp. saying what source would not
- Consumer protection — disclosing synthetic /
Sp.nature
Gap: Clear safe-harbor design pattern for labeled non-identity historical Sp. with transparent provenance.
3. Gh.-specific legal clusters
- Consent and capacity — ante-mortem authorization instruments
- Data protection — personal data of deceased (jurisdiction-dependent; many regimes weaken after death)
- Estates and digital assets — access to accounts, messages, photos
- Fiduciary / custodial duties — loyalty, purpose limitation, conflict
- Posthumous privacy and dignity — patchwork
- Medical / intimate data — heightened duties
- Platform terms — currently primary “governance” in practice
Gap: Portable Ghost governance charter recognized across platforms; default rules when no consent instrument exists (usually: no Gh., only possible Sp. from public data — still ethics-bound).
4. Recommended research stance
Soul Frame label → clarifies design intent and provenance
Legal outcome → independent mapping exercise per jurisdiction
Never → "is Gh." implies "has rights of the deceased"
H10 (authority for Gh.) is a Soul Frame legitimacy criterion that aligns with but is not identical to legal authorization.
5. Design artifacts that would reduce gaps (non-legal)
| Artifact | Purpose |
|---|---|
Sp. provenance manifest |
sources, exclusions, fidelity claims |
Gh. governance charter |
principal, custodian, scope, revocation |
| Disclosure UX standard | always surface Sp./Gh. designation |
| Fork/instance registry | which runtimes are authorized |
| Relational ACL model | who may hear what |
6. Sources (orientation)
- Personality/publicity rights surveys (jurisdiction-specific treatises)
- Data protection regimes on deceased persons (varies)
- Digital estate / digital remains scholarship
- Spitale & Germani digital ghost ethics; Lei et al. AI afterlife expectations
- Deepfake / synthetic media regulation landscape (fast-moving)
- Phase V Soul Frame maps (this workstream)
Status: sketch for synthesis and later WS12 deepening — not legal conclusions.