tegwick
6ccd5e2a6a
Lock the Unitariertag 2009 PDF from Downloads/blog, reconstruct claims D-01–D-29, and write comparative commentary. Main result: strong support for open-system viability and nested life, serious challenge from defining Bewusstsein as survival-function coupling (false friend for Soul Frame consciousness/Mind). Feed findings into Claims, OpenQuestions, Terminology, and bibliography.
103 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
103 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
# Reading notes — Deppert, *Die Evolution des Bewusstseins*
|
||
|
||
**Status:** complete (full available PDF)
|
||
**Edition:** PDF 17 pages / print pp. 85–101; Unitariertag 2009 Halle
|
||
**Rule:** reconstruct Deppert first; Soul Frame comments in brackets.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Outline of the work
|
||
|
||
| Print pp. | Topic (Deppert’s terms) |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| 85–86 | Darwin; human consciousness must be evolutionary; general definitions needed |
|
||
| 86–87 | Living being; five survival functions; consciousness as their coupling |
|
||
| 87–89 | Will to survive; final vs causal science; free will confusion |
|
||
| 89–91 | Open systems, attractors, emergence (NaCl); will as attractor |
|
||
| 91–93 | Molecular life; division of labor → first consciousness; hierarchy of wills |
|
||
| 93–94 | World-picture → human consciousness; mythical → individuality-consciousness |
|
||
| 94–95 | Libet: coupling time, not disproof of free will |
|
||
| 95–96 | Causal + final laws; non-determinism; self as part of reality |
|
||
| 96–97 | *religio* as Rückbindung; nature trust; cultural living beings |
|
||
| 97–98 | Inner existence / dignity / individualistic ethics; unitarian life principle |
|
||
| 98–101 | Notes + literature |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Claim log (paper-internal)
|
||
|
||
| ID | Claim (Deppert) | Where | Confidence |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| D-01 | Human faculties including consciousness must have evolutionary origin in the animal world | p.85 | high |
|
||
| D-02 | A sudden genetic jump explaining consciousness is implausible; start from a general concept of consciousness | p.85–86 | high |
|
||
| D-03 | A living being is an open system with a survival problem that it can solve for a while | p.86 | high |
|
||
| D-04 | Five survival functions are required: perception, recognition/assessment, measure readiness, measure execution, energy supply | p.86–87 | high |
|
||
| D-05 | Consciousness = organizational coupling of those functions when they are differentiated | p.87 | high |
|
||
| D-06 | Earliest life forms need not have consciousness if functions are not yet separated | p.87 | high |
|
||
| D-07 | Consciousness always involves a will to survive; functions are the differentiated expression of that will | p.87 | high |
|
||
| D-08 | Evolution of consciousness forms is evolution of will forms; will is final (goal-directed), not causal | p.87–88 | high |
|
||
| D-09 | Natural science excludes will because it admits only causal description | p.88 | high |
|
||
| D-10 | Free will does not mean freedom *from* what is willed; a will is bound to its aims | p.88 | high |
|
||
| D-11 | Causal determinism dogma creates a false problem for moral responsibility | p.88–89 | high |
|
||
| D-12 | Open-system attractors determine possible futures finally, not causally | p.89–90 | high |
|
||
| D-13 | Emergence: new system properties (e.g. ions vs atoms) not reducible to parts | p.90–91 | high |
|
||
| D-14 | Will enters the world as survival-will in the form of system attractors | p.91 | high |
|
||
| D-15 | First consciousness arises when division of labor requires coupling of survival functions | p.91–92 | high |
|
||
| D-16 | Cell associations form hierarchies of wills; subordinate survival-will / subordinate consciousness (herd, childhood) | p.92–93 | high |
|
||
| D-17 | Organs/cells are living beings with own strategies and subordinate will to the whole (salutogenesis) | p.93 | high |
|
||
| D-18 | Higher animals form environment representations; *human* consciousness requires world-picture procedures | p.93 | high |
|
||
| D-19 | Mythical world-picture = world as product of superior alien wills | p.93 | high |
|
||
| D-20 | Individuality-consciousness is cultural-historical, not genetic; each child reacquires it | p.93–94 | high |
|
||
| D-21 | Libet ~500ms conscious perception / ~150ms pre-decision activity = coupling delay, not absence of free will | p.94–95 | high |
|
||
| D-22 | World is neither fully causally nor fully finally determined | p.95–96 | high |
|
||
| D-23 | We are part of reality, shaping it via outer and inner preservation goals | p.96 | high |
|
||
| D-24 | Knowledge is never certain; *religio* = binding-back to what we take as reliable | p.96–97 | med |
|
||
| D-25 | Human communities are *cultural living beings* with survival-will and demands on members | p.97 | high |
|
||
| D-26 | Subordinate consciousness aids enforcement of community demands | p.97 | high |
|
||
| D-27 | Decisions among memberships guided by self-preservation will for outer and especially *inner* existence | p.97–98 | high |
|
||
| D-28 | Inner existence = human dignity; yields individualistic ethics of meaningful life | p.98 | high |
|
||
| D-29 | Responsible individuality-consciousness = unitarian life principle; Schweitzer formula | p.98 | high |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Definitions to track
|
||
|
||
| Term in Deppert | Working paraphrase | Open issues |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Lebewesen | Open system with temporary solvable survival problem | Includes cultural groups |
|
||
| Überlebensfunktionen | Five functions listed | Maps to Body/Mind/energy |
|
||
| Bewusstsein | Coupling organization of differentiated survival functions | Collides with SF consciousness |
|
||
| Überlebenswille | Will expressed as those functions/coupling | Attractors as first form |
|
||
| Attraktor | State open systems approach and tend to stay in | Final determination |
|
||
| Emergenz | New properties of new systems not explainable by parts | Standard emergence |
|
||
| Weltbild | Representational total ordering of perceptions | Threshold for human consciousness |
|
||
| Individualitätsbewusstsein | Culturally evolved self-responsibility consciousness | Not genetic |
|
||
| Kulturelles Lebewesen | Human community as living being | Nested beinghood |
|
||
| Innere Existenz / Würde | Inner existence identified with dignity | Ethical layer |
|
||
| religio | Binding-back to what is held secure | Not theistic by necessity |
|
||
| Zentralattraktor | Central survival-will attractor | Used in Libet reinterpretation |
|
||
|
||
## Quotations worth preserving
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
p.86 "Ein Lebewesen ist ein offenes System mit einem Überlebensproblem,
|
||
das es eine Weile lösen kann."
|
||
|
||
p.87 "Diese Kopplungsorganisation nenne ich das Bewusstsein des Lebewesens."
|
||
|
||
p.91 "Der Wille kommt als Überlebenswille in Form von Systemattraktoren
|
||
in die Welt!"
|
||
|
||
p.93 "Aber erst wenn ein Lebewesen über Repräsentationsverfahren zur
|
||
Einordnung der Wahrnehmungen in einen Gesamtzusammenhang, einem
|
||
Weltbild, verfügt, lässt sich von einem menschlichen Bewusstsein sprechen."
|
||
|
||
p.93–94 "Das Individualitätsbewusstsein ist nicht genetisch bedingt. Es ist
|
||
kulturgeschichtlich entstanden..."
|
||
|
||
p.97 "...sind auch die verschiedenartigen menschlichen Gemeinschaftsbildungen
|
||
Lebewesen... als kulturelle Lebewesen..."
|
||
|
||
p.98 "Ich bin Leben, das leben will, inmitten von Leben, das leben will."
|
||
(Schweitzer, cited)
|
||
```
|