tegwick
48729f6485
Map agent architectures, memory/persistence mechanisms, and approximate-Being catalog onto Soul Frame vocabulary. Write phase-iv synthesis, strengthen H9 on the Agent/APE side, finish SOUL-WP-0005, and mark SOUL-WP-0006 ready.
106 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
106 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# Phase IV Artificial Beings — Synthesis
|
||
|
||
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0005
|
||
**Date:** 2026-08-12
|
||
**Status:** complete for Phase IV gate
|
||
**Bodies:**
|
||
`research/ai-agents/agent-architecture-crosswalk.md`,
|
||
`research/ai-agents/persistence-and-memory.md`,
|
||
`research/ai-agents/approximate-beings-catalog.md`,
|
||
`research/artificial-persons/digital-persons-and-companions.md`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Purpose
|
||
|
||
Map Soul Frame onto contemporary artificial systems — LLM/tool agents, generative
|
||
agents, companions, digital humans, memory and identity architectures — so later
|
||
Spirit/Ghost work reuses a stable agent/Being vocabulary.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. What holds
|
||
|
||
1. **Most deployed “agents” are Functional Agents or APEs**, not Beings.
|
||
Believable personhood is ahead of constitutive Beinghood (RN-001 Finding 12).
|
||
|
||
2. **Generative Agents (Park et al.)** are the clearest public **proto-Being**
|
||
architecture: memory + reflection + planning + social behavior — still
|
||
**heteronomous** (lifecycle owned by the harness).
|
||
|
||
3. **Actor / Persona / Identity collapse** is the dominant product category error.
|
||
Model ≠ Being; prompt ≠ identity; account ≠ continuity.
|
||
|
||
4. **Memory ≠ continuity.** Memory becomes continuity-relevant only when
|
||
attributable, action-guiding, autobiographically integrated, provenance-protected,
|
||
and coupled to ongoing organization (or an explicit Continuity Bridge).
|
||
|
||
5. **Three axes still classify better than one score:**
|
||
Autonomy (A) · Personhood (B) · Recognition (C).
|
||
Companions maximize B+C; daemons maximize A; chatbots maximize B with low A.
|
||
|
||
6. **Emerging identity-layer research** (Qin et al.; Otsuka et al.; mutability/
|
||
versioning work) converges with Soul Frame **Actor ≠ Being** and governed
|
||
continuity — engineering uptake of Phase I philosophy.
|
||
|
||
7. **Agent, Spirit, Ghost remain provenance/construction descriptors** layered
|
||
*on* the Being stack, not substitutes for it (H9 foreshadowing Phase V).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Vocabulary ready for Phase V
|
||
|
||
| Term | Use for artificial systems |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| Functional Agent | task/role-derived component or system |
|
||
| APE | exposes personhood dimensions by design |
|
||
| Proto-Being | persistent individuating apparatus without full Beinghood |
|
||
| Candidate Being | axes + continuity strong enough for serious Being claims |
|
||
| Heteronomous individual | persistence/self maintained largely from outside |
|
||
| Continuity Bridge | dormant/snapshot path for later resumption |
|
||
| Identity commitment | governed structure for allowed transformations |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Catalog takeaway
|
||
|
||
From `approximate-beings-catalog.md`:
|
||
|
||
- Stateless chat → APE
|
||
- Park-style generative agents → proto-Being
|
||
- Companions → strong APE / candidate Being
|
||
- Control planes → autonomous ≠ Being
|
||
- Swarms under one name → TE-05 multi-level profiles
|
||
- Mature Gh./Sp. → Phase V (authority vs public reflection)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Open technical questions (carry forward)
|
||
|
||
| ID | Question |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| OQ-MEM-01–06 | Memory partition, edit, upgrade, fork, reflection loss, custody |
|
||
| | When does vendor-hosted companion memory ground constitutive continuity? |
|
||
| | Minimal identity layer for Actor swaps without USURPED topology |
|
||
| | Evaluation harnesses for P-profile vs mere fluency |
|
||
|
||
Also folded into `OpenQuestions.md`.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6. Unblock for SOUL-WP-0006
|
||
|
||
Spirits and Ghosts research may assume:
|
||
|
||
- agent architecture crosswalk language,
|
||
- APE/proto-Being/candidate Being distinctions,
|
||
- memory ≠ continuity rule,
|
||
- Actor≠Being and identity-layer precedents,
|
||
- companion/digital-human as high-B/C systems without automatic Gh./Sp. status.
|
||
|
||
## 7. Compact Phase IV thesis
|
||
|
||
> **Contemporary AI agents prove that person-like behavior and even persistent
|
||
> social simulacra can be built long before artificial Beinghood is solved. The
|
||
> missing pieces are rarely more fluency — they are individuating continuity,
|
||
> provenance-governed memory, and honest separation of Actor, Persona, and Being.**
|