tegwick
bd79b100c2
- T01 (RQ4): retain "Soul" - resolved with operator; Terminology.md, concepts/soul.md, OpenQuestions.md, Claims.md, paper/draft.md updated. - T02: lexicographic continuity-weighting procedure in concepts/identity.md, validated against TE-02/03/04/08. - T03: testable Being-vs-Social-Being boundary (three-part recognition test) in concepts/recognition.md and concepts/being.md, validated against TE-05/09. - T04: research/metrics-scoping-note.md - per-axis measurability scoping. - T05: research/law-governance/moral-legal-personhood-charter.md - bounded companion-line charter, explicitly not the mapping itself. - T06: publication pathway resolved with operator - internal circulation only, as paper-one for coulomb-research, following the same staged trajectory as coulomb-research's own paper-zero. Marks SOUL-WP-0009 finished. Opens SOUL-WP-0010 (proposed, not started) to carry forward the two multi-step residuals from T04/T05. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: sonnet Assistant-Process: 136745@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2e334b58-ed31-48ed-8156-d09f8ed0781f
75 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
75 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Being
|
||
|
||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||
**See also:** `Terminology.md`, RQ1, H1–H2, H7, RN-001–003
|
||
|
||
## Working definition (v0.2)
|
||
|
||
> An **autonomous informational individual** exhibiting sufficiently coherent
|
||
> dimensions of **personhood** to become an **addressable** entity that is
|
||
> **recognized** by other Beings as a persistent counterpart.
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
Being ≈ AutonomousIndividuality + Personhood + Addressability + Recognition
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Not arithmetic — four requirement *families*.
|
||
|
||
## Autonomous individuality profile (substrate)
|
||
|
||
From RN-002 (renamed in RN-003 so autonomy alone is not labeled “Being”):
|
||
|
||
| Code | Dimension |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| B1 | Individuability |
|
||
| B2 | Temporal integrity |
|
||
| B3 | Constitutive integration |
|
||
| B4 | Self-maintenance participation |
|
||
| B5 | Endogenous viability |
|
||
| B6 | Adaptive regulation |
|
||
| B7 | Interactional asymmetry |
|
||
| B8 | Identity-preserving transformation |
|
||
|
||
Treat as a **profile**, not eight Boolean gates.
|
||
|
||
## Stack
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
Informational process
|
||
→ Individuated system
|
||
→ Autonomous individual
|
||
→ (+ personhood, addressability, recognition) → Being
|
||
→ (+ reciprocal relations) → Social Being
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Being vs. Social Being — testable boundary (SOUL-WP-0009-T03, resolved 2026-09-28)
|
||
|
||
See `concepts/recognition.md` for the full three-part test (intentional
|
||
recognition + addressability + model persistence across episodes, on at
|
||
least one side). Summary for this file's stack diagram: the `→ Being` arrow
|
||
requires personhood + addressability + *some* recognition of the candidate;
|
||
the `→ Social Being` arrow requires that recognition to specifically be
|
||
**persistent and episode-spanning**, not a fresh one-off classification —
|
||
this is what distinguishes the two arrows and what makes asymmetric
|
||
recognition (TE-09) able to start Social Beinghood on one side alone.
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
|
||
- Not restricted to biological organisms; not automatic for every computational process.
|
||
- Autonomy-only reading yields false positives (self-maintaining daemon, control plane).
|
||
- Personhood-only reading yields false positives (stateless person-like chatbots as APE).
|
||
- Distinguish systemic individuality from social recognition of existence.
|
||
|
||
## Crosswalk
|
||
|
||
| Adjacent term | Similarity | Difference |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| autopoietic system | self-maintaining organization | biological autopoiesis not required; contested beyond life |
|
||
| autonomous agent | multi-criteria agency | agent often functional; Being requires personhood layer |
|
||
| person | personhood layer | personhood ≠ full Beinghood |
|
||
| individual | individuability | may lack autonomy/personhood/recognition |
|
||
| operationally closed system | closure | closure alone insufficient for “someone” |
|
||
|
||
## Sources
|
||
|
||
`research/foundations/001-*.md`, `002-*.md`, `003-beinghood-stress-test.md`
|