STATE-WP-0097: propose unlinked-supersession check; decline hub contest state
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 356991@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 5d99ea69-ed55-4a1e-8d97-f4f312db247f
This commit is contained in:
parent
acf6e277af
commit
fec6b5fdff
2 changed files with 76 additions and 13 deletions
62
workplans/STATE-WP-0097-unlinked-decision-supersession.md
Normal file
62
workplans/STATE-WP-0097-unlinked-decision-supersession.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0097
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "Flag resolved decisions that a later decision supersedes without a link"
|
||||
domain: infotech
|
||||
repo: state-hub
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
owner: claude-code
|
||||
topic_slug: infotech
|
||||
created: "2026-10-13"
|
||||
updated: "2026-10-13"
|
||||
flavor: implementation
|
||||
related: [STATE-WP-0094]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Owner response to activity-core suggestion ff7d2152-75dd-4a49-8dac-e0ebe7343039
|
||||
(contest path for resolved decisions).
|
||||
|
||||
Disposition: State Hub does not add a first-class `contested` decision state or
|
||||
a `/decisions/{id}/contest` route. State Hub is in retirement
|
||||
(`prj-state-hub-retirement`). Decisions are file-first work records whose
|
||||
writer convention is repo-manager (RMGR-WP-0008). The worked example was
|
||||
settled the same day by a superseding decision. The defect was that the hub
|
||||
never linked the two decisions. 1c9817ee (Activity Core owns the publisher)
|
||||
remained `resolved` with `superseded_by: null` after c6f23433 superseded it.
|
||||
The link was set by hand on 2026-10-13 with founder approval.
|
||||
|
||||
The existing model already expresses re-assignment (`status: superseded`,
|
||||
`superseded_by`). This plan makes a missing link visible. It does not add a new
|
||||
authoring surface.
|
||||
|
||||
## Add a consistency check for unlinked supersession
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0097-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Add C-43 (WARN, not auto-fixable) to `scripts/consistency_check.py`. It fires
|
||||
when a resolved decision's title or rationale cites another decision id with
|
||||
"supersedes"/"superseding" while that cited decision is still `resolved`, or
|
||||
has `superseded_by` unset or pointing elsewhere. Report both ids. The fix stays
|
||||
a deliberate founder/decider action: PATCH `status: superseded` and
|
||||
`superseded_by`. Add tests for the linked, unlinked and mismatched cases.
|
||||
Document C-43 in the checker header table.
|
||||
|
||||
## Document the interim contest convention
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0097-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: low
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Document the convention in `docs/`. An owner whose checked-in charter
|
||||
(INTENT.md, SCOPE.md, ADRs) excludes an assigned decision replies on the
|
||||
relaying thread with `CONTEST <decision_id>` and charter refs. Only the founder
|
||||
or the original decider re-resolves. Re-assignment is a new decision that
|
||||
supersedes the old one, followed by the link that C-43 checks. A first-class
|
||||
contest state is routed to the-custodian canon and repo-manager as the
|
||||
long-term owners. It is not built here.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue