tegwick
fec6b5fdff
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 356991@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 5d99ea69-ed55-4a1e-8d97-f4f312db247f
2.3 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated | flavor | related | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STATE-WP-0097 | workplan | Flag resolved decisions that a later decision supersedes without a link | infotech | state-hub | proposed | claude-code | infotech | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-13 | implementation |
|
Owner response to activity-core suggestion ff7d2152-75dd-4a49-8dac-e0ebe7343039 (contest path for resolved decisions).
Disposition: State Hub does not add a first-class contested decision state or
a /decisions/{id}/contest route. State Hub is in retirement
(prj-state-hub-retirement). Decisions are file-first work records whose
writer convention is repo-manager (RMGR-WP-0008). The worked example was
settled the same day by a superseding decision. The defect was that the hub
never linked the two decisions. 1c9817ee (Activity Core owns the publisher)
remained resolved with superseded_by: null after c6f23433 superseded it.
The link was set by hand on 2026-10-13 with founder approval.
The existing model already expresses re-assignment (status: superseded,
superseded_by). This plan makes a missing link visible. It does not add a new
authoring surface.
Add a consistency check for unlinked supersession
id: STATE-WP-0097-T01
status: todo
priority: medium
Add C-43 (WARN, not auto-fixable) to scripts/consistency_check.py. It fires
when a resolved decision's title or rationale cites another decision id with
"supersedes"/"superseding" while that cited decision is still resolved, or
has superseded_by unset or pointing elsewhere. Report both ids. The fix stays
a deliberate founder/decider action: PATCH status: superseded and
superseded_by. Add tests for the linked, unlinked and mismatched cases.
Document C-43 in the checker header table.
Document the interim contest convention
id: STATE-WP-0097-T02
status: todo
priority: low
Document the convention in docs/. An owner whose checked-in charter
(INTENT.md, SCOPE.md, ADRs) excludes an assigned decision replies on the
relaying thread with CONTEST <decision_id> and charter refs. Only the founder
or the original decider re-resolves. Re-assignment is a new decision that
supersedes the old one, followed by the link that C-43 checks. A first-class
contest state is routed to the-custodian canon and repo-manager as the
long-term owners. It is not built here.