state-hub/workplans/STATE-WP-0079-retirement-strangler.md

id	type	title	domain	repo	status	owner	topic_slug	created	updated	parent_project	parent_workplan	related	state_hub_workstream_id
STATE-WP-0079	workplan	State Hub retirement strangler and disposition execution	infotech	state-hub	active	codex	infotech	2026-08-09	2026-08-19	prj-state-hub-retirement	SHR-WP-0001	STATE-WP-0074 SHR-INV-0001 RMGR-WP-0001 HUB-WP-0004	749beac6-3c62-4284-aab5-9ed7fce900c2

State Hub retirement strangler and disposition execution

Goal

Execute the keep/move/replace/retire dispositions from prj-state-hub-retirement/inventory via strangler adapters and owner handoffs, without adding new permanent authorities here. End state: freeze window with no normal traffic, then archive.

Dual-run handoff (RMGR-WP-0002)

Repo Manager Stage B dual-run is available:

• Flags: RM_WRITEBACK, RM_RECONCILE, RM_PILOT_REPOS (see repo-manager/docs/dual-run.md)
• SH adapter: api/services/repo_manager_dual_run.py (PATCH /tasks + C-15 writeback + reconcile proxy)
• Evidence: repo-manager/docs/evidence/wp0002-completion.md

Expand pilot list here as cutover progresses; do not add new checkout mutators in State Hub.

Freeze policy for new scope

id: STATE-WP-0079-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "375c0b66-98b0-4d5b-98dd-4ad2883a4051"

Document and enforce: changes during retirement must preserve compatibility, enable extraction, reduce scope, or fix operational risk — not establish new permanent ownership (INTENT retirement status).

Result (2026-08-20): policies/retirement-freeze.md, following the existing policies/ convention. States the four admissible reasons, the inadmissible case (new permanent ownership here), and the operative test — where does this live after cutover? — since most inadmissible changes are otherwise good changes. Uses STATE-WP-0080's retarget as the worked example.

Enforced by review, not by new automation. A freeze-checker built inside State Hub would be new permanent automation in the component being retired, so the policy would violate itself. Gates attach to points where changes are already reviewed: new workplan goal statements, non-trivial task starts, and slice execution. New tables, routes, or MCP tools carry a presumption against and are the one hard stop.

Capability strangler plan

id: STATE-WP-0079-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "595c3936-20b6-453f-92b5-84f86798054a"

Group SHR-INV-0001 items into cutover slices (repo/work → repo-manager; messages/progress/projections → hub-core; catalogs → owners; retire aliases). Per slice: adapter flag, owner API, rollback.

Result (2026-08-19): docs/retirement-cutover-slice-plan.md. All 425 inventory items assigned to 19 slices in five waves plus Keep, computed against state-hub-disposition.yaml rather than hand-counted. Each slice carries an RM_SLICE_* flag (off/dual/owner), owner API, and rollback; Wave A reuses the RMGR-WP-0002/0003 dual-run adapter rather than adding a mechanism.

Owner readiness verified: only Wave A (repo-manager, 165 items) is executable — RMGR-WP-0001/0002/0003 are finished. Wave B is gated on HUB-WP-0004 (proposed), D1 on OPS-WP-0003 (proposed), D2 on FIN-WP-0003 (proposed). Recommended first cut is A3 (registers), lowest blast radius.

Two findings for T04/T05: the 9 ops_dependency items carry no capability and cannot be strangled behind a flag — they resolve at the T06 freeze window; and the legacy-meter review window is 8 hours despite cadence: weekly, which is not sufficient evidence to retire high-volume /workstreams/ interfaces (E2).

Register CLI and GOAL.md support

id: STATE-WP-0079-T03
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "55716f12-fb12-4a1e-a770-076c490db111"

Adapt statehub register / scaffolding so prj- repos with GOAL.md and repo_flavor: project are valid without inventing durable-product INTENT.md (residual from SHR-WP-0001-T01).

Result (2026-08-19): Implemented by STATE-WP-0080-T01/T02. Project flavor is detected from classification, GOAL.md, or the prj- slug; a repo with an existing GOAL.md is registered without durable scaffolding, while a fresh project delegates scaffolding to rmgr scaffold. The focused State Hub registration suite passes (20 passed).

Execute move/replace slices

id: STATE-WP-0079-T04
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "db5291f2-3801-40fa-abf2-ceb0e77687c9"

Implement strangler handoffs coordinated with RMGR-WP-0001 and HUB-WP-0004. Compatibility tests for each dispositioned route family.

Owner-readiness correction (2026-08-20): T02's slice plan marked all 167 repo-manager items receivable because RMGR-WP-0001/0002/0003 are finished. That reads readiness off workplan status, which is too coarse. Verified against repo-manager/src/repo_manager/: those workplans delivered work-record dual-run, repository observation, and scaffolding. parse/ holds only workplan.py, and the source tree has no reference to sbom, repo_goal, contribution, technical_debt, or extension_point.

So only A1 (partial) and A2 are receivable — 86 items, not 165. A3 (registers, 49), A4 (UI, 22) and A5 (topic spine, 8) have no owner-side surface at all, and RMGR-WP-0004/0005 do not cover them.

Critical path is now repo-manager-side, not here: a repo-manager workplan must build the register, UI, and topic surfaces before 79 Wave A items can move. Building them in State Hub is inadmissible under policies/retirement-freeze.md — it would be new permanent ownership in the component being retired.

A2 checked the same way (2026-08-20): the State Hub adapter exposes exactly three operations — rm_update_task_status, rm_reconcile, rm_scaffold. There is no adapter for workplan CRUD, intake, decision, dependency, or human-flag records, and no repo-manager parser for them either. A2 therefore splits into A2a (task status + reconcile, ~6 items, receivable) and A2b–A2e (~32 items, not receivable).

A2a is the only slice in the whole plan executable today. Its next step is operational rather than code: rmgr dual-run-status shows dual-run entirely off (config_exists: false, writeback/reconcile false, no pilot repos; the 23 metered mutations are RMGR-WP-0002/0003 pilot residue). Moving A2a from off to dual means creating ~/.repo-manager/dual-run.yaml, enabling RM_WRITEBACK and RM_RECONCILE for one pilot repo, and watching the mutation meter for divergence. Reversible by clearing the flags; needs an operator decision because it changes how live task writes flow.

Net: of 425 inventory items, roughly 6 can move today. The retirement is gated almost entirely on owner-side capability in repo-manager and hub-core.

Inherited (2026-08-19) from STATE-WP-0080-T04: this slice now also owns deletion of the templating path in statehub_register.py — INTENT.md generation, the AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / .custodian-brief.md templates, project_rules/, and bootstrap-workplan generation. The code is dead-but-present: project repos are already routed to rmgr scaffold. Gate the deletion on RMGR-WP-0004-T06 proving byte-identical durable output and idempotent re-scaffolding.

Retire legacy surfaces

id: STATE-WP-0079-T05
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "02e508ed-3cde-4487-907e-d324a8a877d6"

Complete retirement of suggestions, workstream aliases, and other retire inventory items once meters/callers allow. Keep historical rows archive-readable.

Blocker identified (2026-08-20): the legacy-meter evidence this task gates on was being captured over an 8-hour band, not a week — capture_legacy_meter_evidence.py fell back to hours=8 whenever --days was omitted, so 39 of 40 captures sampled only 06:00Z–14:00Z. Interfaces called outside that band read as unused. Three candidates on the 2026-08-19 capture had live callers, including GET /tasks/?workstream_id (seen 2026-08-18).

Script default corrected to days=7; corrected capture docs/evidence/legacy-meter-weekly-review-20260820.json.

Candidate rule tightened (2026-08-20): _retirement_state now requires a quiet period scaled to all-time call volume (RETIREMENT_QUIET_LADDER: 7d under 100 calls, 30d under 10 000, 60d above). On the 2026-08-20 capture this makes 15 of 19 legacy interfaces retirable — all workstream MCP tools, the state:// resource, and the low-volume REST aliases — while holding the three six-figure read paths (GET /workstreams/, GET /workstreams/{id}, GET /workstreams/{id}/dependencies/) and GET /tasks/?workstream_id, which still has live traffic. Covered by 7 new tests in tests/test_legacy_meter.py.

Slice E2 executed (2026-08-20): the 15 evidenced interfaces are retired in the legacy meter — all four workstream MCP tools, the state:// resource, and the low-volume REST aliases including PATCH /workstreams/{id} (571 calls), POST /workstreams/ (824) and POST /workstreams/{id}/dependencies/ (4 971). Meter now reads 16 retired / 4 legacy, 0 outstanding candidates. Evidence: docs/evidence/legacy-meter-weekly-review-20260820.json.

Retirements are journalled fleet-side at the-custodian/docs/retired-legacy-interfaces.md — deliberately outside this repo, since State Hub is being archived and the record must outlive it.

Remaining work for this task: the 4 held interfaces (GET /workstreams/, GET /workstreams/{id}, GET /workstreams/{id}/dependencies/, GET /tasks/?workstream_id) clear as their quiet counters run; earliest is 18 more silent days. Re-capture before deciding — the ladder evaluates at review time. Slice E1 part-executed (2026-08-20): suggestion-backlog history archived to the-custodian/docs/archived-suggestion-backlog.md — 10 suggestions, 10 notes, 5 bumps, all declined in the 2026-07-21 intake migration, none promoted. Mutations already 410 since CUST-WP-0061-T06; reads were open only to keep that history reachable, which the archive now replaces.

E1 removal executed the same day: the 8 read routes 410 with a pointer to intake and the archive, the 6 MCP tools are removed outright, the 5 /suggestions write-idempotency rules are dropped, and the dashboard page is deleted with nav, reference.md and wsjf-triage.md updated; dashboard/src/docs/suggestions.md is now the archive pointer. Tables remain for the T06 dump. Two tests that pinned the old read-live behaviour were rewritten to pin the retirement contract.

Naming trap for cutover: ui-feedback.md / todo.md "suggestions" are Shift+click dashboard feedback backed by technical_debt, not this capability. Untouched.

E3 (dashboard-meta) is /ui-feedback — that same feedback surface. Owner is state-hub-until-cutover and it is still in use, so it retires at the T06 freeze window, not now.

Then dashboard-meta (E3, 1); legacy-meter itself (E4, 9) retires last, being the instrument.

Stabilization window and archive prep

id: STATE-WP-0079-T06
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "d52c95c6-af3f-4b2c-804e-e07763c9a8ab"

With T06 gates: zero normal read/write window, final dump, backup/restore evidence, stop service, archive repo read-only. Residuals → live owners.

Acceptance

• Freeze policy documented
• Strangler plan covers all inventory capabilities
• prj-/GOAL.md register path works
• Move/replace slices evidenced with tests/counts
• Retire list closed or residual-owned
• Stabilization + archive prep ready for project retirement