Adapt specs and workplans to SWOT Stage 0 sequencing
Introduce SCOPE, expanded README, CONTRIBUTING, and provisional open-question defaults. Rescope Trust Service work to offline schemas/fold/fixtures, add normative core extraction workplan, and split PRD roadmap Phase 4 into foundation vs hosted service. Sync workplans with State Hub.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7286b52f07
commit
4496244bb8
16 changed files with 1252 additions and 227 deletions
95
SCOPE.md
Normal file
95
SCOPE.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
|||
# Target Revenue Framework — SCOPE
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Living document for Stage 0
|
||||
**Authority:** Describes what is actually in design or delivery *now*.
|
||||
**Counterpart:** [`INTENT.md`](INTENT.md) is stable and aspirational. A gap between INTENT and this file is expected and is a maturity signal, not a defect.
|
||||
|
||||
**Last updated:** 2026-07-28
|
||||
**Basis:** SWOT recommendations in `history/260728-SWOT-Assessment.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Current maturity
|
||||
|
||||
| Label | Meaning |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Stage 0** | Concept consolidated; product/tech orientation specs exist; no production legal text; no production Trust Service |
|
||||
| Trust Service federation | Stages 1–6 from concept §15 are **out of current delivery scope** (design readiness only) |
|
||||
| Legal TRSL | Research and non-binding draft skeleton only; specialist review required before any real Phase |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. In scope now
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation and specification
|
||||
|
||||
- Maintain INTENT, this SCOPE, concept, PRD, TSD, and working defaults.
|
||||
- Extract normative core artifacts (PRD Roadmap Phase 1):
|
||||
- `specs/TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md`
|
||||
- `specs/PhaseManifestSpecification.md`
|
||||
- `specs/TargetLedgerSpecification.md`
|
||||
- Prior-art research and non-binding `TargetRevenueSourceLicense-Draft.md` skeleton (WP-0001).
|
||||
- Provisional answers to conversion-critical open questions (`specs/OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md`).
|
||||
- Degeneration policy research artifact (recommended default for Stage 0 pilots).
|
||||
- Canonical monetization profiles as documentation (defaults + examples).
|
||||
- Lightweight contributor policy (`CONTRIBUTING.md`).
|
||||
|
||||
### Runnable specification foundation (not a hosted service)
|
||||
|
||||
- Machine-readable schemas for Phase Manifest, Ledger Entry, Extension Contract, Conversion Attestation.
|
||||
- Pure, deterministic Outstanding Target fold and offline conformance validators.
|
||||
- Golden Phase package under `examples/` (concept §23 numbers).
|
||||
- Optional thin library/CLI for `validate` / `fold` — **no** requirement for multi-tenant hosting, auth productization, or federation protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
### Work system
|
||||
|
||||
- Hub-linked workplans, progress events, and consistency sync for this repo.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Explicitly out of scope now
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Deferred to |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Production Trust Service (registries, hosted ledger API, metrics product) | After Phase 1 normative docs + schema foundation; dedicated Trust Service PRD |
|
||||
| Finalized legal license text and commercial agreements | Specialist legal review post draft skeleton |
|
||||
| Final degeneration formula as irreversible norm | Research + pilot learning |
|
||||
| Federation Stage 2+ (replication, multi-operator, multi-authority) | PRD Roadmap Phase 6 |
|
||||
| Multi-stakeholder governance institutions | PRD Roadmap Phase 7 (lightweight draft only if needed) |
|
||||
| Tax / statutory revenue recognition | Permanently out of framework core (INTENT boundaries) |
|
||||
| Governing third-party product Phases in production | After legal + Stage 0 package ready |
|
||||
| Accepting external code into a governed Milestone Release | Until contributor-rights instrument exists |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Sequencing rules (binding for workplans)
|
||||
|
||||
These rules implement SWOT I-05 / I-06 and the PRD roadmap order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Normative extraction (WP-0003) and prior-art research (WP-0001)** proceed in parallel with **schema + pure fold + golden fixture (WP-0002)**.
|
||||
2. **Full Trust Service implementation** (Phase Registry service, hosted append API, Metrics product, multi-user operation) **must not** start until:
|
||||
- WP-0003 core extract deliverables exist (or are explicitly waived by human decision), and
|
||||
- Working defaults for Longstop, currency, recognition, and minimum evidence are published.
|
||||
3. **Human accept gates** (recorded in the workplan or a decision note) are required before treating as done:
|
||||
- WP-0001-T06 TRSL draft skeleton (legal-sensitive),
|
||||
- WP-0002 stack/library ADR (if technology is locked),
|
||||
- Any promotion of working defaults into normative core language.
|
||||
4. New monetization ideas land as **profiles/extensions**, not core terms, unless they pass the complexity budget (universal / interoperable / trust-critical).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Stage 0 “done enough” signal
|
||||
|
||||
Stage 0 package is acceptable when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. A newcomer can explain the five-verb lifecycle from README + core doc alone.
|
||||
2. Offline tools validate a golden Phase and recompute Outstanding Target to zero with no network service.
|
||||
3. Open questions have provisional defaults or explicit “blocked on legal/research” labels.
|
||||
4. WP-0001 research artifact exists; legal draft is marked non-binding and not used in production.
|
||||
5. This SCOPE honestly states what is not yet claimed.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Change policy
|
||||
|
||||
Update this file when Stage 0 boundaries change (e.g. first hosted Trust Service pilot authorized, first legal review complete). Do **not** weaken INTENT to match short-term delivery; expand SCOPE when INTENT milestones become active work.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue