WP-0003-T06 review: cross-link polish for full pointer symmetry

Per reviewer request (polish only, item 5): added the same "ultimate
source / day-to-day reference" dual-citation to the PRD header's
Terminology alignment line, matching README/TSD/CONTRIBUTING. Named all
three other normative extracts (PhaseManifestSpecification.md,
TargetLedgerSpecification.md, MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md) in
CONTRIBUTING.md's Terminology section, which previously named only
TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md - now symmetric with README's full
four-document table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-29 20:12:58 +02:00
parent 54bfc726fa
commit 6b34c05e35
3 changed files with 13 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ This repository defines a **framework concept and specifications**. It does not
## Terminology
Use the normative terms from `specs/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` §7 (day-to-day reference: `specs/TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md` §1). Do **not** reintroduce ambiguous synonyms for conversion metrics (e.g. treating total project “revenue captured” as equivalent to Development Credit).
Use the normative terms from `specs/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` (ultimate source). Day-to-day reference — extracted and stabilized, not a source of variant meaning — is: `specs/TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md` §1 (core terms), `specs/PhaseManifestSpecification.md` (Phase Manifest fields), `specs/TargetLedgerSpecification.md` (ledger entries, fold), and `specs/MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md` (extension contract). Do **not** reintroduce ambiguous synonyms for conversion metrics (e.g. treating total project “revenue captured” as equivalent to Development Credit).
Pre-conversion software is **source-available**, not OSI Open Source.