tegwick
9c7576e8de
specs/PhaseProvenanceSpecAddendum.md accepted 2026-08-03. Implementation filed as its own workplan (TREV-WP-0015), seven tasks mapping 1:1 to the addendum's sections rather than repeating field shapes/rationale: schema change, specs/policies/ + specs/profiles/ extraction, Control Plane reference-rendering routes, ledger UI change, forgejo_hubs migration, backfilling the three example manifests, and tests/closeout. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
132 lines
5 KiB
Markdown
132 lines
5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015
|
||
type: workplan
|
||
title: "Implement Phase provenance, spec-file, and ledger UI changes"
|
||
domain: infotech
|
||
repo: target-revenue
|
||
status: active
|
||
owner: claude
|
||
topic_slug: infotech
|
||
created: "2026-08-03"
|
||
updated: "2026-08-03"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Implement Phase provenance, spec-file, and ledger UI changes
|
||
|
||
Implements `specs/PhaseProvenanceSpecAddendum.md`, accepted 2026-08-03,
|
||
which itself synthesizes the decisions from
|
||
`workplans/TREV-WP-0012-phase-provenance-and-policy-modeling.md` T02–T04.
|
||
Task numbering below matches the addendum's §6 suggested breakdown
|
||
1:1 — each task cites its addendum section as the authoritative source of
|
||
what to build, rather than re-deriving field shapes or rationale here.
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T01
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Schema change** (addendum §1): add `repo_hub`, `repo_hub_uri`,
|
||
`repo_id`, `repo_name` as required properties of
|
||
`phase.milestone_release`, and `phase.base_phase_id` as an optional
|
||
property of `phase`, to `schemas/phase_manifest.schema.json`. Update
|
||
`validation.py` if the new pattern/format constraints need anything
|
||
beyond what JSON Schema's own `pattern`/`format` keywords already
|
||
enforce (they shouldn't). Add offline tests: a manifest missing any of
|
||
the four new required fields is rejected; one with `base_phase_id`
|
||
absent validates (first Phase); one with it present and correctly
|
||
patterned validates (successive Phase).
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T02
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Spec-file extraction** (addendum §2): create `specs/policies/
|
||
linear-longstop-v0.md` (extracted from `specs/
|
||
OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md` Q7's prose, with `policy_id`/`title`
|
||
frontmatter); create the six `specs/profiles/*.md` files (extracted from
|
||
`specs/CanonicalMonetizationProfiles.md` §1–§6, with `extension_id`/
|
||
`title` frontmatter), leaving §7 (cross-profile summary) and §8
|
||
(non-goals) in place as the overview document. Add `calculator_id`/
|
||
`revision`/`title` frontmatter to `specs/
|
||
DevelopmentEffortCalculatorConcept.md` (no move). Update
|
||
`OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md` Q7 to point at the new file rather
|
||
than contain the policy's content directly.
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T03
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: medium
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Control Plane reference-rendering routes** (addendum §2): add
|
||
`GET /reference/policies/{slug}` and `GET /reference/profiles/{slug}` to
|
||
`service/control_plane_app.py`, rendering the corresponding
|
||
`specs/policies/`/`specs/profiles/` markdown file to HTML server-side at
|
||
request time (a small Python markdown library — confirm one is already
|
||
an acceptable addition to the `service` extras in `pyproject.toml`, or
|
||
add it). Read-only, no edit capability. Link to these routes from
|
||
wherever a policy id or extension id already appears in
|
||
`phase_detail.html`/`phase_new.html`.
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T04
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: medium
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Ledger UI change** (addendum §3): drop the `ledger` input from
|
||
`phase_new.html`; have the registration route auto-compute
|
||
`phase.ledger` as the canonical `/phases/{phase_id}/ledger` reference
|
||
before validation/persistence. Add a small "ledger reference"
|
||
link/disclosure to `phase_detail.html` showing the raw reference plus a
|
||
live-data link when it resolves to this same instance. The existing
|
||
Ledger entries table is untouched.
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T05
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**`forgejo_hubs` migration** (addendum §4): new migration
|
||
`migrations/0007_forgejo_hubs.sql`, table `forgejo_hubs (hub_slug
|
||
PRIMARY KEY, service_uri, first_seen_at, updated_at)`, auto-populated on
|
||
first sight of a `repo_hub` during Phase registration (mirroring
|
||
`ensure_licensor_identity`'s auto-create-on-first-INSERT trigger
|
||
pattern in `migrations/0005_licensor_credentials.sql`). Decide during
|
||
implementation (not a T02-style human gate, per the addendum) whether
|
||
correcting a hub's URI after the fact is a `SECURITY DEFINER` governance
|
||
action or a plain `UPDATE`, and document whichever is chosen.
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T06
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: medium
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Backfill the three example manifests** (addendum §5):
|
||
`examples/pilot-candidates/{net-kingdom-local-identity,
|
||
railiance-vergabe-teilnahme, info-tech-canon-service-surface}/manifest.json`
|
||
each get `repo_hub`/`repo_hub_uri`/`repo_id`/`repo_name` from their real
|
||
Forgejo data (`GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}`, same call already
|
||
confirmed working for `target-revenue` itself during WP-0012-T02), no
|
||
`base_phase_id` (all three are first Phases), and `ledger` set to match
|
||
what the Control Plane would now auto-compute.
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: TREV-WP-0015-T07
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Tests, docs, and closeout**: offline schema/validation tests (T01),
|
||
Docker-gated `TestClient` tests for T03's new routes and T04/T05's
|
||
changes (extending `tests/test_control_plane_app.py`), a rendering smoke
|
||
test that each `specs/policies/`/`specs/profiles/` file actually renders
|
||
without error. Update `README.md`'s WP-0015 row and this workplan's
|
||
Result sections; run the full offline + Docker-gated suite; fence-count
|
||
check before committing any workplan edit, per this project's standing
|
||
practice.
|