target-revenue/workplans/TREV-WP-0013-remission-credit-automation.md
tegwick 3064c0fe0c Go-live T05 + WP-0013/0014: first Phase and Control Plane completion
Accept WP-0008-T05 for trsl:phase:info-tech-canon-service-surface
(history/260805-T05-GoLive-info-tech-canon.md). Finish WP-0013 remission
automation and WP-0014 extension/breach/attestation Control Plane UI.
Update SCOPE, README, and pilot-candidate notes for pilot Stage 1.
2026-08-05 16:00:06 +02:00

5.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

id type title domain repo status owner topic_slug created updated state_hub_workstream_id
TREV-WP-0013 workplan Remission Credit automation (degeneration policy execution) infotech target-revenue finished claude infotech 2026-07-30 2026-08-05 4a423219-2a3e-413c-b0dc-f8542c2afba1

Remission Credit automation (degeneration policy execution)

Spun out of workplans/TREV-WP-0012-phase-provenance-and-policy-modeling.md (use case 4). Every Phase declares a degeneration_policy (trsl:policy:linear-longstop-v0 is the accepted v1 norm, specs/OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md Q7), which is supposed to generate remission-credit Target Ledger entries over time when Development Credit progress is insufficient (FR-6, specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md). Nothing in this codebase previously computed or wrote these entries. fold.py can consume them if they exist; this workplan produces them. This gap predated the Control Plane UI work — it was never in scope for WP-0006 (Trust Service) or WP-0009 (Control Plane), and surfaced when reviewing the UI's Phase-registration flow prompted a fuller look at what a Phase's lifecycle actually requires end to end.

Blocked on workplans/TREV-WP-0012-phase-provenance-and-policy-modeling.md T03's decision (how a policy id maps to its spec file) — unblocked when WP-0012 finished and WP-0015 landed specs/policies/linear-longstop-v0.md.

id: TREV-WP-0013-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "d6ab7448-c009-4398-b616-560e8085cf1a"

Design the remission calculation and scheduling model. R(t) = T0 × clamp((t - t0)/(tL - t0), 0, 1) (Q7) needs: a chosen recognition cadence (daily/monthly UTC per Q7's own text), an idempotent "has this period's remission already been recorded" check (ledger entries are append-only — a re-run must not double-remit), and a decision on where t0 (Phase activation) comes from if it isn't already a manifest field (registration time? an explicit activated_at?). Cross-check against whatever trsl:policy:linear-longstop-v0's spec file (once WP-0012-T03 lands) says, rather than re-deriving the formula from Q7 prose alone.

Result (2026-08-05): Design recorded in src/target_revenue/remission.py module docstring and specs/policies/linear-longstop-v0.md Status section:

  1. t0 = Trust Service phase_manifests.registered_at. No new manifest activated_at field for Stage 0 — a Phase is not active until registered. Pure callers pass t0 explicitly.
  2. Cadence / idempotency: cumulative delta model, not period-keyed rows. Each run remits max(0, R(as_of) Σ policy remission-credit). Re-run at the same as_of is a no-op; missed schedules catch up without double-counting. Dust floor MIN_REMISSION_AMOUNT = 0.01. Scheduled convention: monthly UTC (1st 00:00) or longstop if sooner.
  3. Actor: dedicated Licensor credential labeled system:policy-engine (rights operator), auto-issued on first use. Never a null submitted_by_token; never a human credential for policy-driven rows. Control Plane audit still records which human triggered an on-demand run.
  4. Formula checked against specs/policies/linear-longstop-v0.md, not re-derived from Q7 prose alone.
id: TREV-WP-0013-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "078da2e7-594b-4bd3-85b6-881a808f1ca2"

Implement and test the calculation as a pure function (mirroring fold.py's determinism discipline) plus whatever writes the resulting remission-credit entries into the hosted Target Ledger — a scheduled job, an on-demand Control Plane action, or both. Decide which actor "submits" these entries for attribution purposes (no human credential naturally owns a policy-driven entry) and record that decision explicitly rather than leaving submitted_by_token implicitly null.

Result: src/target_revenue/remission.py — pure cumulative_remission / plan_remission / build_remission_entry_input plus hosted apply_remission_for_phase / apply_remission_for_all_phases. Trust Service routes: POST /phases/{id}/remission (on-demand, Operator+), POST /remission/run (batch for cron). Control Plane: control_plane.apply_policy_remission + form on phase detail. Tests: tests/test_remission.py (pure), tests/test_remission_hosting.py (Docker Postgres — append, idempotency, system:policy-engine attribution, metrics forecasts).

id: TREV-WP-0013-T03
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "fe12ee80-2868-4857-83ca-04bd7223e270"

Surface it in the Control Plane UI: phase_detail.html's Ledger table already renders remission-credit rows generically once they exist; verify that holds, and add a metrics-level explanation (e.g. next scheduled remission date/amount) if metrics.py doesn't already forecast one.

Result: metrics.compute_metrics gains optional activated_at and forecasts remission_if_applied_now, next_scheduled_remission_at, next_scheduled_remission_amount (labeled forecast, never facts). Hosted metrics and Control Plane phase detail pass registered_at as t0. phase_detail.html shows the forecast table, activation/longstop facts, and an Operator+ "Apply policy remission now" button. Existing ledger table continues to render remission-credit rows generically.