target-revenue/examples/pilot-candidates/README.md
tegwick 9886742fa8 Advance WP-0008: governance, candidate survey, pilot manifests, CLA draft
T01: specs/TRSL-Governance.md. Resolves the Licensor-identity question
(maintainer decision, 2026-07-29): a single shared Licensor, Binky
Hedgehog GmbH, operating as the binky tenant, across all four product
lines - not per-product-line. Unblocks (does not itself resolve) the
License/CUA arbitral-institution selection now that the Licensor's own
jurisdiction is known. Tables versioning/extension-governance/operator-
governance status per concept §20, naming open items (compatibility
rules, deprecation criteria, conflict-of-interest rule, key-rotation
history) rather than silently assuming them solved.

T02: specs/PilotPhaseCandidateSurvey.md. Direct repo inspection (hub
had no goal data for three of four product lines) plus an Explore-agent
survey of all ten railiance-* repos. Two defensible candidates found:
NK-WP-0002 Local Identity (net-kingdom, Incremental 10x) and
vergabe-teilnahme (railiance-apps, Product-defining 100x, the only
genuinely product-shaped deliverable across ten railiance-* repos).
coulomb-loop and helix-forge have no candidate, for stated principled
reasons (internal tooling; pre-implementation-stage, respectively).

T03: examples/pilot-candidates/ - draft, non-binding Phase Manifests
for both real candidates, trsl:phase:draft-* ids, empty ledgers,
schema-validated, explicit README stating nothing here is authorized
to go live.

T04: specs/TRSL-ContributorLicenseAgreement-Draft.md, implementing the
CLA-not-assignment recommendation from
history/260729-TRSL-ContributorRights-Research.md - narrowly scoped to
the current Phase's TRSL terms plus its already-declared Future
License at Conversion, same preliminary-candidate treatment as the
License/CUA V1C1 documents. CONTRIBUTING.md updated to point at it
while keeping the external-contribution block in effect until accepted.

T05's precondition list updated to reflect what's now resolved, still
left todo by design pending the maintainer's own go-live decision.
2026-07-29 22:52:52 +02:00

31 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown

# Pilot candidate Phase Manifests — DRAFT, NOT DECLARED
These manifests are **draft, non-binding worked examples**
(`workplans/TREV-WP-0008-governance-and-pilot-rollout.md` T03), following
the pattern established by `examples/phase-001/`. They are structurally
valid and conformance-tested exactly like `examples/phase-001/`, but:
- **No Commercial Entitlement is for sale under either manifest.**
- **No Development Credit is being tracked for either candidate.**
- **Neither repo's actual License header has been changed to TRSL.**
- `phase.id` uses a `draft-` prefix specifically so it cannot be confused
with a real, declared Phase.
Built from the two candidates identified with a defensible rationale in
`specs/PilotPhaseCandidateSurvey.md` (T02) — `coulomb-loop` and
`helix-forge` produced no defensible candidate at survey time and are
not represented here.
**Nothing here is authorized to go live.** That remains gated behind
`workplans/TREV-WP-0008-governance-and-pilot-rollout.md` T05, regardless
of how complete or plausible these examples look.
| Directory | Product line | Candidate deliverable | Indicative Target Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| `net-kingdom-local-identity/` | `net-kingdom` | `NK-WP-0002` Local Identity | Incremental (10x) |
| `railiance-vergabe-teilnahme/` | `railiance-*` (`railiance-apps`) | `vergabe-teilnahme` (`RAILIANCE-WP-0002`/`-0014`) | Product-defining (100x) |
All figures (`initial_target`, `target_basis`) are illustrative
placeholders for this worked-example exercise, not a real costing or
pricing proposal — see `specs/PilotPhaseCandidateSurvey.md` for the
underlying candidate rationale.