target-revenue/workplans
tegwick c7e23f5ef5 Fix Contingency Share rule: non-contingent financing, not a disguised bounty
Per maintainer correction: the previous "Standard Bounty Amount" was still
paid only on success, meaning it remained outcome-contingent and would not
actually escape prohibitions worded around outcome-contingency generally
(India's Rule 20: "a fee contingent on the results of litigation") rather
than percentage-proportionality specifically (Germany's quota-litis-style
rules). Renamed to "Standard Financing Amount" and restructured as a fixed
sum paid or made available regardless of the Enforcement Action's outcome
- a grant toward litigation cost, not a contingent fee in any form.

specs/EnforcementNetworkConcept.md §13 rewritten as a sequential rule
rather than "higher of two comparable numbers" (contingent percentages and
non-contingent financing are not commensurable, and treating them as
interchangeable is exactly what would make the financing look like a
disguised contingent fee):

  1. 50% Contingency Share where lawful at that level.
  2. Else the jurisdiction's own lower lawful outcome-contingent cap.
  3. Else - no lawful outcome-contingent fee exists at all - no
     Contingency Share; the Licensor's own non-contingent fee arrangement
     with its lawyer governs what's owed win or lose, and the Trust
     Service's Standard Financing Amount offsets that cost regardless of
     outcome. Fee risk is genuinely higher here, by design: this is what
     it means for the risk-shifting a contingent fee normally provides to
     be unavailable, not an oversight to paper over.

New §13.0 makes explicit (per maintainer instruction) that nothing in this
rule creates a right for the Trust Service, an Enforcement Partner, or a
Litigation Funder to initiate a case - pressing charges remains
exclusively the Licensor's decision. The rule only makes a ready,
low-friction default (published caps, financing, EPA template) available
once that decision is made.

Added new core term §5.9 Standard Financing Amount; updated §5.5-5.7, §6's
lifecycle step, §9's EPA outline, and the concise definition to match.
Updated WP-0005 T10's synthesis scope and README accordingly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 18:44:48 +02:00
..
TREV-WP-0001-license-prior-art-research.md Draft Commercial Use Agreement V1C1 template 2026-07-29 12:48:23 +02:00
TREV-WP-0002-trust-service-foundation.md Accept ADR-0001 and close TREV-WP-0002 2026-07-29 02:07:22 +02:00
TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
TREV-WP-0004-global-jurisdiction-research.md Complete WP-0004 and WP-0005 jurisdiction research (8 of 8 each) 2026-07-29 17:07:42 +02:00
TREV-WP-0005-enforcement-network-research.md Fix Contingency Share rule: non-contingent financing, not a disguised bounty 2026-07-29 18:44:48 +02:00