With WP-0001/0002/0003 finished, PRD Phase 4b (hosted Trust Service) is unblocked per SCOPE.md's own sequencing rule, and the midterm goal shifts from framework design to practical application: governing and monetizing repos across the coulomb Forgejo org's product lines (coulomb-loop, net-kingdom, helix-forge, the railiance-* family). - TREV-WP-0006: Trust Service reference implementation (PRD Phase 4b). Eight tasks from PRD to conformance-tested hosted service, explicit that it builds infrastructure only - no real payments or Phase tracking. - TREV-WP-0007: Degeneration policy finalization (PRD Phase 5) and the full canonical monetization profile catalog (remainder of Phase 3) - pilot Phases can't responsibly launch on the placeholder pilot policy and one-line profile defaults alone. - TREV-WP-0008: Governance formalization (PRD Phase 7) and pilot rollout preparation. Forces a real design decision the framework never had to answer while single-repo-hypothetical: who is "the Licensor" across four independent product lines. Produces draft, non-binding Phase Manifests as worked examples for one repo per product line, and a CLA draft. All three explicitly preserve SCOPE.md's existing "no production Phases until legal review" guardrail rather than overriding it under pressure to monetize real repos: WP-0008-T05 is a dedicated, human-gated go-live decision, and no other task in any of the three workplans is permitted to authorize a real Phase, real Commercial Entitlement sale, or real Development Credit tracking. Updates SCOPE.md (new Stage 0/Stage 1 maturity table, revised out-of-scope table distinguishing "infrastructure in scope" from "going live still gated"), PRD roadmap (Phase 4b/5/7 now active, pointing at the new workplans), and README's active-work table accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.3 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TREV-WP-0008 | workplan | Governance formalization and pilot rollout (coulomb / net-kingdom / helix-forge / railiance) | infotech | target-revenue | active | claude | infotech | 2026-07-29 | 2026-07-29 |
Governance formalization and pilot rollout
The midterm goal: govern and monetize the evolution of repos across the
coulomb Forgejo org's product lines — coulomb-loop, net-kingdom,
helix-forge, and the railiance-* family (railiance-apps,
railiance-bootstrap, railiance-cluster, railiance-enablement,
railiance-fabric, railiance-forge, railiance-hosts, railiance-infra,
railiance-master, railiance-platform). This workplan formalizes the
governance the framework has been designed around but never actually
written down, and prepares (but does not itself execute) the first real
Phase declarations.
Hard gate, stated up front: SCOPE.md §3 lists "governing third-party
product Phases in production" as out of scope "after legal + Stage 0
package ready" — i.e., not yet. This workplan's rollout tasks (T03–T04)
produce draft, non-binding Phase Manifests as worked examples, exactly
like examples/phase-001/ already is. No real Commercial Entitlement may
be sold, no real Development Credit tracked, and no repo's actual License
header changed to TRSL, until T05 (the go-live gate) is explicitly
accepted — after TRSL/CUA specialist legal review (workplans/TREV-WP-0004-global-jurisdiction-research.md /
workplans/TREV-WP-0005-enforcement-network-research.md T10 syntheses
feed this) and T01 (Licensor governance) are both resolved. Moving fast on
T01–T04 must not create pressure to skip T05.
Governance document: TRSL-Governance.md
id: TREV-WP-0008-T01
status: todo
priority: high
Produce specs/TRSL-Governance.md, per spec/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md
§20 (complexity budget, versioning, extension governance, operator
governance). Must resolve one question this rollout makes concretely
unavoidable for the first time: who is "the Licensor" across four
different product lines under one Forgejo org — a single shared Licensor
entity for all four (simplest, but conflates genuinely different products'
commercial decisions), or a per-product-line Licensor (each of
coulomb-loop, net-kingdom, helix-forge, railiance declaring its own
Phases independently under a shared TRSL/CUA template)? This was never
forced while the framework was single-repo-hypothetical; it is now.
Also define: change process for the License/CUA templates themselves once
multiple product lines depend on them, extension canonicalization review
(coordinate with workplans/TREV-WP-0007-degeneration-policy-and-canonical-profiles.md
T04's narrower checklist), and dispute/conflict-of-interest handling per
concept §20.3–§20.4.
Repo inventory and Phase-candidate survey
id: TREV-WP-0008-T02
status: todo
priority: high
For each of coulomb-loop, net-kingdom, helix-forge, and the
railiance-* family: survey current repo goals and status (via the state
hub's get_domain_summary/list_domain_repos/repo-goal tools, or direct
repo inspection where hub data is thin) to identify one plausible first
Milestone Release candidate per product line — a bounded, recently- or
soon-to-be-completed piece of work with a defensible Target Multiple
classification (specs/TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md §1.4), not an
arbitrary pick. Document why each candidate was chosen and what was
passed over.
Draft pilot Phase Manifests (non-binding worked examples)
id: TREV-WP-0008-T03
status: todo
priority: high
Using T02's candidates, draft one Phase Manifest per product line
following specs/PhaseManifestSpecification.md and
schemas/phase_manifest.schema.json exactly — structurally valid,
conformance-tested the same way examples/phase-001/ is, but explicitly
marked draft / not yet declared (no real Commercial Use restriction
takes effect from these). Choose an applicable Monetization Extension per
Phase from workplans/TREV-WP-0007-degeneration-policy-and-canonical-profiles.md
T03's catalog.
Contributor rights instrument (CLA)
id: TREV-WP-0008-T04
status: todo
priority: medium
CONTRIBUTING.md currently blocks external contributions into any
governed Milestone Release until a contributor-rights instrument exists
(per history/260729-TRSL-ContributorRights-Research.md). If any pilot
candidate from T02 has, or expects, external contributors before its
Conversion Event, this is now practically blocking, not theoretical.
Produce specs/TRSL-ContributorLicenseAgreement-Draft.md: a CLA scoped
narrowly to the current Phase's TRSL terms plus its already-declared
Future License, per the T04 research's recommendation. Same preliminary-
candidate treatment as the License/CUA V1C1 documents (status banner,
Appendix A-style candidate notes) — this is a new legal document, not
exempt from that pattern.
Go-live gate (human decision)
id: TREV-WP-0008-T05
status: todo
priority: high
human_accept_required: true
Do not mark this task done to authorize real Phase declarations. It exists to make the go-live decision a single, explicit, recorded moment rather than something that happens by accretion once enough pilot infrastructure exists. Before acceptance, confirm:
workplans/TREV-WP-0004-global-jurisdiction-research.mdT10 andworkplans/TREV-WP-0005-enforcement-network-research.mdT10 syntheses are complete, or their absence is an explicitly accepted risk;- specialist legal review of
specs/TargetRevenueSourceLicense-V1C1.mdandspecs/TargetRevenueCommercialUseAgreement-V1C1.md(condition 1 in each document's status banner) has occurred, or is explicitly waived for a defined pilot scope; - T01's Licensor-identity question is resolved for whichever product line goes first;
workplans/TREV-WP-0006-trust-service-implementation.mdhas a working hosted Trust Service, or an explicit interim manual/git-based ledger process is accepted for the pilot instead.
Once accepted, this task's Result should name which specific repo and Phase go live first — "governance and rollout infrastructure exists" is not the same event as "a real Phase is declared," and this workplan should not blur that line even after everything above is ready.