Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 276069@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2e192b3d-b3e8-4403-94d4-d55a2c8b476c
4.6 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | flavor | owner | topic_slug | created | updated | related | state_hub_workstream_id | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TREV-WP-0016 | workplan | Wave-2 resource right-sizing from the 2026-10-21 allocation review | infotech | target-revenue | ready | implementation | claude | infotech | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-21 |
|
8cf5b88a-10e4-5d13-9f80-7e5d42b5b7a3 |
TREV-WP-0016 — Wave-2 resource right-sizing from the 2026-10-21 allocation review
Receiving workplan in target-revenue for the wave-2 request changes below.
Origin: the 2026-10-21 node allocation review (RESOURCE-WP-0008-T03, feeding CUST-WP-0071-T03). Per the founder's 2026-10-21 delivery interview (the-custodian/docs/decisions/2026-10-21-cust-wp-0071-delivery-interview.md) the small adjustments form wave 2: one receiving task per owner repo, applied later in a batch. Applying wave 2 needs a separate founder approval, so every cluster-write task here is a human-gated wait. This file changes no manifest.
Apply the reviewed request changes
id: TREV-WP-0016-T01
status: wait
priority: medium
needs_human: true
blocking_reason: "Wave-2 cluster write; founder approval for wave 2 not yet given (2026-10-21 interview)"
state_hub_task_id: "385c3c88-d5b1-55e3-88b7-ada3547985f6"
Values are pod-aggregate figures from the budget file (7-day window ending 2026-10-21T06:08Z). Limits stay unchanged unless stated.
| Workload (ns/name) | Pods | CPU request | CPU limit | CPU p95/peak 7d (m) | Memory request | Memory limit | Mem p95/peak (Mi) | Throttle | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
target-revenue/target-revenue |
1 | 50m → 5m | 1000m | 2.5/2.6 | 256Mi → 64Mi | 512Mi | 52.0/70.9 | 0 | decrease + memory down |
target-revenue/target-revenue-pg |
1 | 0m → 50m | 0m (1 container(s) without CPU limit) | 7.6/9.2 | 0Mi → 80Mi | 0Mi | 56.2/63.4 | None | increase + memory up |
Source and container detail:
target-revenue/target-revenue: Deploymenttarget-revenue, containertarget-revenue,k8s/railiance/deployment.yaml(50m/256Mi, limits 1000m/512Mi).target-revenue/target-revenue-pg: CNPG Cluster ink8s/railiance/cnpg-cluster.yaml— nospec.resourcestoday; add requests 50m/80Mi (limits stay unset unless the owner decides otherwise). Single-instance Cluster: the change restarts PostgreSQL; announce a short window.
Evidence: resource-control docs/evidence/2026-10-21-node-allocation-review/2026-10-21-node-budget.md (+ .json, commit 3d9b1bd). Rule: CPU = max(floor, p95x1.5, peakx0.5) rounded up to 5m; memory request = 7d p95 working set x1.15 (only when the change is at least 64Mi).
Steps:
- Map the pod-aggregate proposal onto the named container(s) in the source file; where a workload has several containers or pods, split by the per-pod figures in
2026-10-21-workload-usage.jsonand keep the sum at the proposed value. - Prepare the source change as a reviewed commit (no push, no sync) and record the before values here.
- Apply only inside the batched wave-2 rollout, after founder approval, through the owner's normal deploy path (ArgoCD sync or documented helm/kubectl apply).
Verification: kubectl -n <ns> get pod -o jsonpath='{..resources}' shows the new requests; pods Ready with no new restarts or OOMKilled over 24h; for CPU decreases the throttle ratio and request latency stay at or below the 7d baseline; node request total drops by the expected delta.
Rollback: revert the source commit and re-sync/re-apply; the before values in the table above are the rollback target. Keep before/after kubectl get -o yaml captures as the receipt.
Prepared 2026-10-22 (wave-2 worker W1b)
Status stays wait / needs_human. Local commit only: not pushed, not applied. Diff = full owner render vs live (kubectl diff, object names and changed key paths only, Secret objects skipped).
- Live source: ArgoCD Application
target-revenue, pathk8s/railiance,targetRevisionpinned toa3a8a27in railiance-platform, manual sync. - Change: target-revenue
322dab4: app requests 50m/256Mi -> 5m/64Mi; Clustertarget-revenue-pggains requests 50m/80Mi with no limits. - Diff: resource fields only on the Deployment and Cluster. A sync also runs the Sync-hook Jobs
target-revenue-migrateandtarget-revenue-bootstrap-binkyagain, which is the normal behaviour of this path. Tests pass. - Restart: yes. The single-instance CNPG cluster restarts PostgreSQL.
- Apply: push, bump the
targetRevisionpin inrailiance-platform/argocd/railiance01/applications/target-revenue.application.yaml(another worker's repo), thenargocd app sync target-revenue.