flex_auth.py: CheckRequest + FlexAuthCheckClient against flex-auth's real POST /v1/check contract (schemas/check_request.schema.json, decision_envelope.schema.json, read directly from the flex-auth repo, not guessed). Fail-closed by construction: only effect=="allow" authorizes; every other effect, non-200, malformed body, or transport failure resolves to deny, nothing raises past is_allowed(). authz.FlexAuthWriteAuthorizer implements the existing WriteAuthorizer Protocol. Action -> resource-type mapping coordinated with FLEX-WP-0008's planned vocabulary (both repos reference the same table). DefaultDenyWriteAuthorizer stays the fallback when no flex-auth URL is configured. config.py: Settings.from_env(), mirroring qonto-assistant's pattern. docs/flex-auth-integration.md documents the contract, fail-closed rule, and current real state (denies everything until FLEX-WP-0008 lands). 60 tests passing. Verified live twice over real HTTP between separate processes (not just MockTransport): a deny-returning flex-auth double produces 403 from POST /tenants, an allow-returning one produces 201. Also registered (not implemented) the two workplans this depends on for a complete picture: flex-auth/FLEX-WP-0008 (protected-system registration -- what makes allow reachable) and key-cape/KEY-WP-0005 (discovered key-cape emits none of iam-profile_v0.3.md's core claims yet, not just missing tenant_roles -- a bigger, security-sensitive gap flagged rather than quietly worked around). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 KiB
flex-auth Integration (TEN-WP-0003)
tenant-engine gates every write through flex-auth's POST /v1/check
(flex_auth.FlexAuthCheckClient, wired in as authz.FlexAuthWriteAuthorizer).
What tenant-engine sends
A CheckRequest per flex-auth/schemas/check_request.schema.json:
{
"id": "check:<uuid>",
"tenant": "tenant:friendly:binky",
"subject": {"id": "<actor>", "type": "service"},
"action": "tenant.create",
"resource": {"id": "<tenant_id>", "type": "tenant", "system": "tenant-engine"}
}
Action → resource-type mapping (must match flex-auth's
FLEX-WP-0008-T01 vocabulary exactly — coordinate values, don't diverge):
| Action | Resource type |
|---|---|
tenant.create |
tenant |
tenant.role.grant |
role-grant |
tenant.role.revoke |
role-grant |
tenant.plan.assign |
plan-assignment |
What tenant-engine expects back
A DecisionEnvelope per flex-auth/schemas/decision_envelope.schema.json.
Only effect: "allow" authorizes the write. Every other effect
(deny/redact/audit_only/not_applicable), a non-200 response, a
malformed body, or a transport failure/timeout all resolve to deny —
FlexAuthCheckClient.is_allowed() never raises past its own boundary; it
always returns a plain bool.
The current real state
Until flex-auth/workplans/FLEX-WP-0008-tenant-engine-consumer-integration.md
lands (resource/action vocabulary + an authored policy package), every
check resolves to deny or not_applicable — verified against real
flex-auth behavior, not assumed. This is correct fail-closed behavior,
not a bug: tenant-engine cannot perform any write against a real flex-auth
deployment until that policy package exists. Verified locally with a fake
HTTP double standing in for flex-auth (deny → 403, allow → 201,
both over real HTTP between two processes) — see TEN-WP-0003's closure
notes for the exact commands.
Configuration
| Env var | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
TENANT_ENGINE_FLEX_AUTH_URL |
unset | Base URL of a reachable flex-auth deployment. When unset, create_app() falls back to authz.DefaultDenyWriteAuthorizer — no writes ever succeed, which is the correct posture for local/test runs that have no flex-auth to call. |
TENANT_ENGINE_FLEX_AUTH_TIMEOUT_SECONDS |
3 |
Bounded timeout on the synchronous write path — no retries, so a slow deny doesn't become a hang. |
Related
flex-auth/workplans/FLEX-WP-0008-tenant-engine-consumer-integration.md— the flex-auth-side work this client depends on for realallowdecisions, and (separately) flex-auth's own live-lookup consumption oftenant-engine's/roles/liveendpoint for other protected systems.key-cape/workplans/KEY-WP-0005-iam-profile-core-claims.md— the cache-read/tenant_rolesdirection (key-cape→tenant-engine), not covered by this doc.net-kingdom/canon/standards/tenant-engine-boundary-contract_v0.1.md— the Authorization Contract section this client implements.