Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-08-22:
- workplan status: ready → active
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
H-001..H-005 with explicit falsification conditions, E-001..E-003, the
Concept-Implementation Fitness Map, findings log and ID convention. Plain
files, no tooling.
- fitness map corrects Improvement Loop section 13 levels downward: nothing
exceeds C1 without implementation
- H-005 (Energy) dormant by decision - events captured, no scoring written
- H-001 gets a genuine control arm so the semantic-action thesis is not
trivially true
- E-003 added: deliberately attacks the safety boundary rather than only
sampling benign cases
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
Answers the two questions gating the rest of TD-WP-0002.
Classifier: stratify evidence into S1 surface / S2 realization / S3 judgment.
Adaptation writes only to S1; claims and invariants are run inputs with no
adaptation write path, so False Adaptation Rate = 0 is architectural rather
than a tuning target. Classification is a total function over three signals,
defaulting to AMBIGUOUS on missing evidence; a surface change concurrent with
a verdict change is PRODUCT_DEFECT. Semantic actions declare permitted
surfaces so surface-substitution cannot pass as recovery.
Provenance: claims require a source causally independent of the
implementation. agent-from-implementation output is an exploratory hypothesis
until a human promotes it.
New adoption precondition D-07: test-driver requires an independent
observation channel into the system under test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
Three documents defined conflicting milestone sequences; an unqualified
reference to e.g. 'M2' was ambiguous across the corpus.
- docs/TestDriverInitialMilestones.md (M0-M10) is now canonical
- INTENT.md and ConceptModel section 15 carry superseded banners plus a
mapping table rather than being deleted
- canonical order is explicitly distinguished from execution order
- research/findings/ established; F-0001 filed as CONCEPT_DRIFT, resolved
via path 2 (concept deliberately revised), with one residual for T10
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-08-22:
- update .custodian-brief.md for test-driver
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-08-22:
- update .custodian-brief.md for test-driver
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
- history/2026-08-22-concept-assessment-swot.md: SWOT assessment of the
concept corpus with recommendations for the first workplan
- statehub register: infotech domain, TD-WP prefix, generated AGENTS.md,
.custodian-brief.md and TD-WP-0001 bootstrap workplan
- .repo-classification.yaml: category research, domain infotech
- SCOPE.md rewritten with real repo boundaries
- TD-WP-0002: vertical spike reordering M0-M10 into one end-to-end thread
that can falsify the crystallization thesis early
- commit previously untracked INTENT.md and docs/
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
