Alice/Bob/Carol runs end to end, deterministically, replayable from seed. 16 tests pass, no third-party dependencies. - src/testdriver: intent, provenance, world, actions, drivers, observers, oracles, evidence, energy, scenario, runner - lab/minimal.py: the SUT, exposing the independent observation channel required by D-07 - evidence is stratified S1/S2/S3; Runner refuses to attribute S2/S3 to an actor; claims are frozen and provenance-checked at construction - missing evidence yields INCONCLUSIVE, which outranks PASS in the run verdict - EnergyEvents captured, no scoring (H-005 dormant) The observation channel records both stored state and an out-of-band enforcement probe; their disagreement is an invariant and is what detects an authorization defect that leaves the audit trail intact. A seeded RevokeIsCosmetic lab fails the run via both the claim and that invariant. Also closes TD-WP-0001-T02 (stack and commands now exist). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
3.7 KiB
Concept ↔ Implementation Fitness Map
Updated: 2026-08-22 (TD-WP-0002-T04)
Traces each important concept to the implementation, experiment and evidence that support it. Unsupported entries are the point of this map — a concept with no implementation and no evidence is not a gap to be embarrassed about, it is the current honest state, and hiding it defeats the map's purpose.
Support levels follow TestDriverImprovementLoop.md §13:
C0 Idea · C1 Hypothesis · C2 Experimentally Supported ·
C3 Practically Validated · C4 Architectural Invariant
Current state
The deterministic kernel exists (T04) and its guarantees are covered by unit
tests. Levels have not moved. A passing unit test is not an experiment: it
shows the code does what its author intended, not that the concept holds under
the mutations it claims to survive. Levels rise when E-001/E-002/E-003 produce
evidence, not before. The implementation column below moves; the level column
does not. The initial classifications in §13 of the Improvement Loop
(Actor Isolation C2, Independent Oracles C2) are corrected downward here: they
were aspirational, not evidenced.
| Concept | Level | Implementation | Experiment | Evidence | Open question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C-use-case |
C1 | intent.py |
— | — | Is a use case expressible without leaking mechanics? |
C-actor-isolation |
C1 | world.py |
E-001 | — | Isolation is asserted by construction; unverified. |
C-semantic-action |
C1 | actions.py |
E-001 | — | Does identity survive restructuring better than a recorded sequence? (H-001) |
C-oracle-independence |
C1 | runner.py, oracles.py |
E-001, E-003 | — | Independence of components ≠ independence of belief. (H-004) |
C-evidence-pack |
C1 | evidence.py |
— | — | What is the minimum sufficient for replay? |
C-observation-channel |
C1 | lab/minimal.py |
— | — | D-07 — required of every system under test. Adoption cost unknown. |
C-adaptation |
C1 | — (T08) | E-001 | — | (H-002) |
C-classification |
C1 | — (T08) | E-001, E-003 | — | Decision table is total on paper; unexercised. |
C-crystallization |
C1 | — (T09) | E-002 | — | (H-003) |
C-intent-provenance |
C1 | provenance.py |
E-003 | — | Constrains provenance, not quality. Accepted residual. |
C-lineage |
C0 | — | — | — | Parent pointer only in the spike. |
C-energy |
C0 | energy.py, capture only |
— | — | Dormant by decision. (H-005) |
C-temperature |
C0 | — | — | — | Deferred. No implementation planned in TD-WP-0002. |
C-confidence |
C0 | — | — | — | Deferred. |
C-campaign |
C0 | — | — | — | Deferred. |
C-metabolism |
C0 | — | — | — | Deferred. Depends on C-energy. |
C-retirement |
C0 | — | — | — | Deferred. Depends on C-energy. |
C-security-mutation |
C1 | — | E-003 | — | Catalogue exists; no derivation mechanism. |
Orphan check
Conceptual orphans — concepts with no planned implementation in TD-WP-0002:
C-temperature, C-confidence, C-campaign, C-metabolism, C-retirement.
All five are deferred by explicit decision, not oversight. They are the group most at risk of being built because they are easy and satisfying, and never validated. They are revisited at T10, where the question is not "when do we build these" but "does the evidence justify keeping them in the model at all".
Implementation orphans — none. Every module in src/testdriver/ traces to a
concept above. energy.py is the one to watch: it exists solely to capture
events for a dormant hypothesis, and if T10 finds no use for the history it
should be removed rather than kept out of sentiment.