test-driver/research/hypotheses/H-001-semantic-action-stability.md
tegwick cf682281d7 Complete local generalisation tasks and document remaining experiment blockers
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0e76f-be98-7ae3-965d-e0b31290a4c4
2026-09-28 12:06:24 +02:00

3 KiB

id title status created experiments concepts
H-001 Semantic Action Stability EXPERIMENTING 2026-08-22
E-001
C-semantic-action

H-001 — Semantic Action Stability

Claim

A semantic action survives implementation restructuring better than a recorded UI interaction sequence.

Falsification condition

Across the labelled mechanical mutations in the lab (T05), a recorded interaction sequence survives at least as many mutations as the semantic action does.

If mechanics-free identity buys no measurable durability, the central abstraction is decorative and SemanticAction should be reduced to a naming convention.

Measurement

Mechanical Recovery Rate for each of two arms over the same mutation set:

  • arm A — semantic action realized by an agentic driver;
  • arm B — a recorded selector-based sequence captured against the baseline.

Arm B is a genuine control and must be run, not assumed to fail.

Threats to validity

The comparison is unfair if arm B is built naively — a brittle straw man makes H-001 trivially true and worthless. Arm B uses the most robust selector strategy reasonably available (roles, labels, test ids where the lab provides them).

Result so far (TD-WP-0002-T07)

Twelve mechanical mutations, both arms, same semantic action:

Discovery (agentic) Recorded selectors (control)
test ids preserved (9) 9/9 9/9
test ids dropped (3) 2/3 0/3

Not falsified, but substantially narrowed. Where stable identifiers survive, the control arm matches the agentic arm exactly — the semantic action buys nothing. It earns its keep only where identifiers are absent or not carried forward.

Three mutations on the deciding side is directionally clear and statistically nothing. See research/findings/F-0005-... — the concept model overstates this and should be revised to match the evidence.

Scope caveat (F-0004): the driver tests structural durability only. Visual relayout is untested.

Status log

  • 2026-08-22 PROPOSED. No evidence.
  • 2026-08-22 EXPERIMENTING. Partial evidence from T07; awaiting E-001 in full.

Expanded measurement — 2026-09-28 (TD-WP-0003-T03)

38 mutations, including ten that drop test ids and seven new paired structural controls. Discovery and recorded selectors both pass 17/17 preserved-id cases; on dropped ids discovery passes 9/10 and recorded selectors 0/10. M22 remains unrealizable. The full journey accepts 26/27 mechanical cases; FAR remains 0/7 on the unchanged defect set. Claim/provenance indices remain unchanged.

Reproduce: PYTHONPATH=src:. python3 tools/measure_e001.py /tmp/e001.json. Raw result. These selected and correlated synthetic HTML cases do not establish population reliability, visual/browser coverage, model capability or economics. See review for the mechanism list and limits. H-001 remains supported only in the narrowed identifier-loss setting.