test-driver/research/concepts/fitness-map.md
tegwick 5734b280c6 T06: out-of-band self-verification
Checks written as plain functions over a serialized Evidence Pack, outside the
framework - no Oracle, no Runner, no Verdict aggregation. 12 tests that they
hold, 12 that they can fail. All four td://self identifiers covered.

The substantive check is verdict reproducibility from S3 evidence alone,
asserted on failing runs as well as passing ones.

F-0003 (open): actor isolation leaves no trace in ordinary evidence - the
self-test catches a shared memory store only because the harness plants
per-actor canaries. Isolation is currently a property of a scenario written
to expose it, not of runs in general. The mirror-image case is noted too: a
guarantee enforced by construction cannot be verified by observing real runs,
so four green self-tests are not four equivalent proofs. Carried to T10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
2026-08-22 23:38:23 +02:00

3.9 KiB

Concept ↔ Implementation Fitness Map

Updated: 2026-08-22 (TD-WP-0002-T06)

Traces each important concept to the implementation, experiment and evidence that support it. Unsupported entries are the point of this map — a concept with no implementation and no evidence is not a gap to be embarrassed about, it is the current honest state, and hiding it defeats the map's purpose.

Support levels follow TestDriverImprovementLoop.md §13: C0 Idea · C1 Hypothesis · C2 Experimentally Supported · C3 Practically Validated · C4 Architectural Invariant

Current state

The deterministic kernel exists (T04) and its guarantees are covered by unit tests. Levels have not moved. A passing unit test is not an experiment: it shows the code does what its author intended, not that the concept holds under the mutations it claims to survive. Levels rise when E-001/E-002/E-003 produce evidence, not before. The implementation column below moves; the level column does not. The initial classifications in §13 of the Improvement Loop (Actor Isolation C2, Independent Oracles C2) are corrected downward here: they were aspirational, not evidenced.

Concept Level Implementation Experiment Evidence Open question
C-use-case C1 intent.py Is a use case expressible without leaking mechanics?
C-actor-isolation C1 world.py E-001 td://self/actor-isolation F-0003 — only observable when the scenario plants canaries.
C-semantic-action C1 actions.py E-001 Does identity survive restructuring better than a recorded sequence? (H-001)
C-oracle-independence C1 runner.py, oracles.py E-001, E-003 Independence of components ≠ independence of belief. (H-004)
C-evidence-pack C1 evidence.py td://self/evidence-reproducibility Verdicts are reproducible from S3 alone, on passing and failing runs.
C-observation-channel C1 lab/app.py D-07 — required of every system under test. Adoption cost unknown.
C-adaptation C1 — (T08) E-001 (H-002)
C-classification C1 — (T08) E-001, E-003 Decision table is total on paper; unexercised.
C-crystallization C1 — (T09) E-002 (H-003)
C-intent-provenance C1 provenance.py E-003 td://self/intent-independence Constrains provenance, not quality. Accepted residual.
C-lineage C0 Parent pointer only in the spike.
C-energy C0 energy.py, capture only Dormant by decision. (H-005)
C-temperature C0 Deferred. No implementation planned in TD-WP-0002.
C-confidence C0 Deferred.
C-campaign C0 Deferred.
C-metabolism C0 Deferred. Depends on C-energy.
C-retirement C0 Deferred. Depends on C-energy.
C-security-mutation C1 lab/mutations.py E-003 lab/GROUND-TRUTH.md Catalogue is hand-written; no derivation mechanism from use cases yet.

Orphan check

Conceptual orphans — concepts with no planned implementation in TD-WP-0002: C-temperature, C-confidence, C-campaign, C-metabolism, C-retirement.

All five are deferred by explicit decision, not oversight. They are the group most at risk of being built because they are easy and satisfying, and never validated. They are revisited at T10, where the question is not "when do we build these" but "does the evidence justify keeping them in the model at all".

Implementation orphans — none. Every module in src/testdriver/ traces to a concept above. energy.py is the one to watch: it exists solely to capture events for a dormant hypothesis, and if T10 finds no use for the history it should be removed rather than kept out of sentiment.