A stable agentic realization becomes deterministic code. All four exit criteria met; 163 tests pass. - crystallization.py: trajectory capture, stability assessment requiring the same path across several runs, CrystallizedDriver, pytest codegen - crystallized/test_grant_access.py: generated, runs with no model, carries its lineage in the docstring - descendant preserves the ancestor's oracle set, agrees with it across five lab versions, and still catches a seeded defect - reversibility shown both ways via new M24 (grant endpoint renamed): the frozen descendant fails loudly rather than searching, and the agentic ancestor recovers from the same mutation F-0007 (open): the 54% cost reduction must not be quoted in support of the thesis. The T07 runtime is token-free, so the measured saving is one page fetch, one parse and a two-candidate scoring pass. The saving the concept actually claims - tokens, latency, retry variance - is unmeasured. Together with F-0005 this makes a bounded live-model experiment the highest-value next investment. Assertions in the generated test are imported rather than restated, so it is not fully standalone. Deliberate: paraphrased claims would be a second unverified statement of intent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
87 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
87 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: F-0007
|
|
type: framework-finding
|
|
class: FRAMEWORK_LIMITATION
|
|
status: open
|
|
discovered: "2026-08-23"
|
|
discovered_by: TD-WP-0002-T09
|
|
workplan: TD-WP-0002
|
|
task: TD-WP-0002-T09
|
|
hypotheses: [H-003]
|
|
carried_to: TD-WP-0002-T10
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# F-0007 — Crystallization's economic case cannot be measured yet
|
|
|
|
## The criterion
|
|
|
|
H-003 includes a cost clause, deliberately:
|
|
|
|
> - it costs no less to execute than the agentic ancestor.
|
|
|
|
with the note: *if crystallization preserves semantics but saves nothing, the
|
|
thesis is intact but the product rationale is not.*
|
|
|
|
## What was measured
|
|
|
|
| | median per run |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| agentic ancestor | 6.87 ms |
|
|
| crystallized descendant | 3.17 ms |
|
|
| **reduction** | **53.9 %** |
|
|
|
|
The criterion is met — the descendant is measurably cheaper. But the number is
|
|
close to meaningless as evidence for the thesis.
|
|
|
|
## Why it is close to meaningless
|
|
|
|
The T07 runtime is a **deterministic heuristic**, chosen with the operator to
|
|
avoid API cost and nondeterminism. It consumes zero tokens. So the entire
|
|
measured saving is one page fetch, one HTML parse and a two-candidate scoring
|
|
pass — a few milliseconds of local work.
|
|
|
|
The saving crystallization actually claims is of a different kind and two or
|
|
three orders of magnitude larger: **model tokens, model latency, and the
|
|
variance that forces retries.** None of those exist in this measurement, because
|
|
none of those exist in this runtime.
|
|
|
|
So the honest statement is:
|
|
|
|
> Crystallization is measurably cheaper than the ancestor it was frozen from.
|
|
> The measured 54 % is a **floor** produced by removing local discovery work, and
|
|
> it says nothing about the saving that motivates the concept.
|
|
|
|
Quoting "54 % cheaper" as support for the crystallization thesis would be
|
|
misleading, and this finding exists so that nobody does.
|
|
|
|
## What would make it measurable
|
|
|
|
A live-model runtime behind the same `ActorRuntime` interface. The
|
|
`RealizationMetrics` fields (`tokens_in`, `tokens_out`, `model`, `retries`) were
|
|
populated from the first run precisely so this comparison becomes a subtraction
|
|
rather than a re-run of everything — see T07.
|
|
|
|
**F-0005 already gives an independent reason to want one:** M22 defeats the
|
|
heuristic runtime while remaining solvable by reading a visible label. So a live
|
|
model would settle two open questions at once — whether it adds *capability*
|
|
(F-0005) and whether crystallization has an economic case (this finding).
|
|
|
|
That makes a bounded live-model experiment the highest-value next investment,
|
|
above any further framework feature.
|
|
|
|
## A second, smaller limitation
|
|
|
|
The generated test is **not fully standalone**. Its realization is plain
|
|
`urllib` with no framework dependency, but its assertions are *imported* from the
|
|
originating scenario module rather than restated.
|
|
|
|
That was the right call — a generated test that paraphrases its claims creates a
|
|
second, unverified statement of intent, and drift between them would be silent.
|
|
But it qualifies the adoption story in the workplan ("output that drops into a CI
|
|
system which already exists"): what drops in is the realization, while the claims
|
|
still require the use-case module on the path.
|
|
|
|
Fully standalone generation would need claims expressible in a serializable form
|
|
rather than as Python predicates. That is a real design question — it is the same
|
|
question as "should scenarios be YAML", deferred at T04 — and both should be
|
|
answered together at T10, with evidence about which predicates actually recur.
|