CB-WP-0011-T03: evidence — the chaos roll fired, and it was right
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Has been cancelled
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Has been cancelled
CB-EV-0009. Tier S did not produce a worse outcome than tier L would have. The roll deleted a survey that would have opened on 2D toolkit selection; the decomposition it forced instead found that the existing text renderer was showing 24 of 41 view fields. The structural trigger fires on a property of the plan, not of the code, so nothing in the tier derivation could have said the port was the wrong first question. Recorded honestly in both directions: the pass also made an interface change with no review, which is the cost side. One favourable fire is not a calibration; the window stays open to 2026-09-30. Corrects a number this pass asserted: the T01 commit message says '42 of 43, up from 24'. Measured by splicing the old renderer back in, it is 41 of 42 with 1 declared omitted, up from 24 -- and 16 fields were genuinely absent, not 17, because outcome.winners was rendered in a different format. Both original figures were counted by hand. CHAOS gains its first caught entry. Cheapest pass per response yet recorded (0.094 vs a previous best of 0.123).
This commit is contained in:
parent
b11fc91fd4
commit
0d2ab2286d
3 changed files with 216 additions and 6 deletions
|
|
@ -120,7 +120,9 @@ target = ""
|
|||
checks = "d4 on each tier declaration, 12-declaration calibration window"
|
||||
added = "2026-07-30"
|
||||
review_by = "2026-09-30"
|
||||
caught = []
|
||||
caught = [
|
||||
"CB-WP-0011: first fire in 6 declarations — d4=4 rolled stage 1 from structural L to S; the deleted survey would have opened on 2D toolkits while the existing text renderer was showing 24 of 41 view fields (CB-EV-0009 §1)",
|
||||
]
|
||||
retire_if = "the window closes with no overridden tier producing a different outcome than the argued one — the evaluation this window exists to make possible"
|
||||
|
||||
[[gate]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue