CB-WP-0011-T03: evidence — the chaos roll fired, and it was right

CB-EV-0009. Tier S did not produce a worse outcome than tier L would
have. The roll deleted a survey that would have opened on 2D toolkit
selection; the decomposition it forced instead found that the existing
text renderer was showing 24 of 41 view fields. The structural trigger
fires on a property of the plan, not of the code, so nothing in the
tier derivation could have said the port was the wrong first question.

Recorded honestly in both directions: the pass also made an interface
change with no review, which is the cost side. One favourable fire is
not a calibration; the window stays open to 2026-09-30.

Corrects a number this pass asserted: the T01 commit message says
'42 of 43, up from 24'. Measured by splicing the old renderer back in,
it is 41 of 42 with 1 declared omitted, up from 24 -- and 16 fields
were genuinely absent, not 17, because outcome.winners was rendered in
a different format. Both original figures were counted by hand.

CHAOS gains its first caught entry. Cheapest pass per response yet
recorded (0.094 vs a previous best of 0.123).

workplans/CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 id: CB-WP-0011
 kind: product
 title: "Stage 1, first slice: an inspector that shows everything"
-status: todo
+status: done
 state_hub_workstream_id: "1142442a-65f1-483a-800d-6ca8490c5f1a"
 ---
 
@@ -110,9 +110,17 @@ test run against a state where the fields are absent is the same lie in a
 different costume.
 
 **Done 2026-08-02.** The renderer moved to `tools/cb-play/src/inspect.rs`
-and now covers **42 of the 43 leaf paths** in a populated `GroundView`,
-up from 24. The one omission is `players.*.hand` — `null` for a
-non-viewer seat, where the absence is what `hand N card(s)` renders.
+and now covers **41 of the 42 leaf paths** in a populated `GroundView`.
+The one omission is `players.*.hand` — `null` for a non-viewer seat,
+where the absence is what `hand N card(s)` renders.
+
+**Measured, not counted** (T03): the old renderer produced 24 of the 41
+tokens. One of the 17 it missed, `outcome.winners.*`, it did in fact
+show — in a different format (`["P1", "P2"]` rather than `winners P1,
+P2`), so the token misses it. **16 fields were genuinely absent**, and
+that is the number to quote. The commit message for this task says
+"42 of 43, up from 24"; both figures were counted by hand before the
+measurement and both were wrong.
 
 `every_view_field_is_classified` walks the serialized view for leaf
 *paths* (not keys — `problem` occurs under a DARVO target, a GROUND
@@ -193,7 +201,7 @@ nothing at all would still have reported a matching hash and passed.
 
 ```task
 id: CB-WP-0011-T03
-status: todo
+status: done
 priority: medium
 state_hub_task_id: "db722865-1233-4918-952d-0bf4761199e4"
 ```
@@ -217,3 +225,12 @@ Write `evidence/CB-EV-0009-inspectable-table.md` covering:
 lands; the port half is untouched and INTENT's stage-1 line stays open.
 Marking a stage complete because part of it works is the failure mode
 stage 0 avoided by leaving the CLI player open for three passes.
+
+**Done 2026-08-02.** [CB-EV-0009](../evidence/CB-EV-0009-inspectable-table.md).
+The headline: tier S did **not** produce a worse outcome, and the reason
+is not that tier L was unnecessary — the roll forced a decomposition that
+found a defect the survey would have walked past. Recorded as the CHAOS
+gate's first `caught` entry, with the window left open.
+
+Also on record, against my own prior: I recommended tier L in the turn
+before the roll, and the roll was right.