Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
c38ecd9da3 CB-WP-0012-T05: evidence — tier L deleted its own deliverable
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
CB-EV-0010. The pass's own verdict on the tier it ran at.

Full-weight review withdrew the capability port the declaration was made
to build. A tier-S pass has no step 2 and would have shipped it, and
stage 2 would have found it unimplementable — which is what CommitWindow
is already on record in this repo for doing.

Two corrections of the survey's own numbers, compounding:
  AM-4a headroom       3,750 claimed -> 92,798 measured   (25x)
  cheapest windowed  480,501 claimed -> 140,079 measured  (3.4x)
  headline ratio         128x        -> 1.5x              (85x)

The prediction from CB-EV-0009 §4 held: meta budget reads 0%, published
in advance and unfalsified.

A correction that is now a pattern: CB-EV-0009 reported CB-WP-0011 at
45 responses / $4.23 / 0.094; final is 71 / $7.02 / 0.099. Still the
cheapest pass, so the conclusion stands. But that is the second
consecutive evidence file to report its own pass's cost low — a pass
cannot measure its own cost, and one quoting its own is quoting a floor.

First priced tier comparison on a single subject: 0.123 $/response at L
against 0.099 at S — 24% more, for a pass that found the two errors
above. On one data point, step 2 is cheap.

Not shipped, and said plainly: the emitted JavaScript has never been
executed. The socket loop is tested end to end with synthetic HTTP and
the page is asserted against as a parsed document, but no browser engine
has run it. INTENT stage 1 therefore stays open even though all four of
its named deliverables now exist.

SH-3 reads 0.0% for a sixth consecutive pass and remains the oldest
unargued number in the project.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 04:30:10 +02:00
0d2ab2286d CB-WP-0011-T03: evidence — the chaos roll fired, and it was right
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Has been cancelled
CB-EV-0009. Tier S did not produce a worse outcome than tier L would
have. The roll deleted a survey that would have opened on 2D toolkit
selection; the decomposition it forced instead found that the existing
text renderer was showing 24 of 41 view fields. The structural trigger
fires on a property of the plan, not of the code, so nothing in the
tier derivation could have said the port was the wrong first question.

Recorded honestly in both directions: the pass also made an interface
change with no review, which is the cost side. One favourable fire is
not a calibration; the window stays open to 2026-09-30.

Corrects a number this pass asserted: the T01 commit message says
'42 of 43, up from 24'. Measured by splicing the old renderer back in,
it is 41 of 42 with 1 declared omitted, up from 24 -- and 16 fields
were genuinely absent, not 17, because outcome.winners was rendered in
a different format. Both original figures were counted by hand.

CHAOS gains its first caught entry. Cheapest pass per response yet
recorded (0.094 vs a previous best of 0.123).
2026-08-02 02:48:51 +02:00
cd2dc5380a CB-WP-0009-T02: gates.toml and make gate-review
ADR-0006 D3. Nine standing control gates now say what they check, what
they have caught with pointers, when their keep-or-kill argument is due,
and what would retire them. make gate-review reports what is overdue and
what has caught nothing; it never fails the build, for CB-RES-0005 §4's
reason.

Drift is checked in both directions and both are pinned by self-tests: a
dependency of `make all` that is neither a registered control gate nor
listed in not_control_gates is a loop-lint finding, so a new gate cannot
acquire permanence without a review date, and an entry naming a target
the Makefile lacks is a finding too.

First run: 0 due, 2 silent. The silent two are the chaos roll, whose
12-declaration window exists precisely to find out, and gate-review
itself, which is not exempt from its own rule — if it has retired,
tightened or forced the re-justification of nothing by 2026-12-31 it is
a ritual and goes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 15:42:13 +02:00