Test 1: the enforced count rose. AM-2, AM-6, AM-9 and AM-11 moved from unmutatable to red; AM-7's hash clause was re-earned so it is 2/3 rather than 1/3. Kernel spec->code link 15/18 -> 18/18, names only. Both denominators are stated. 8 of 14 is 57%, but four rows cannot be enforced — AM-3 blocked on an artifact, AM-4c withdrawn, AM-5 declared ungated by the spec, AM-10 withdrawn — so it is 8 of 10 enforceable. The 14 stays the headline and AM-4c stays in it on purpose: a score improved by deleting the question is not an improvement. Test 2: one row regressed and was caught. Moving AM-6's gate from debug to release turned its mutation SURVIVED, because 4,000 black_box iterations were calibrated against debug's 3.4x headroom and are invisible against release's 20x. The generalizable finding is that a weak mutation is not a fixed property of a row — it can become weak when the row's measurement conditions change, without the row, the mutation or the code being touched. Final SURVIVED count: 0. Test 3 is now mechanical rather than asserted. mutation-check gained an EXPECT-VACUOUS verdict: if a row's expect string appears in PASSING output, the FA guard would accept any failure at all, so the row is reported broken rather than red. Final run: 0 vacuous expects across 14 rows. The control exists because the failure happened — my first expect for AM-2 was "AM-2", which appears in the passing report and would have accepted a compile error as proof of enforcement. The cost result is a refutation, not a win. Mechanical share rose to 50%, the highest ever recorded and above the 38% baseline that motivated CB-WP-0004. That is not a tooling regression: environment setup and task closes are still at zero two passes on. It is the other half of CB-WP-0004 T06's finding arriving in force — text patching (45 turns, $13.79) and orientation (19 turns, $10.97) never had their manual path removed, and a code-heavy pass is exactly where that spends. Mean context 493,486 against a 200,000 target, up from 315,170. SessionShape has stated SS-01..SS-05 since CB-WP-0003 and none has ever been enforced — the only acceptance-adjacent numbers in this project with no gate at all, in a pass whose entire subject was ungated numbers. Numbering corrected: the workplan said CB-EV-0004, which CB-WP-0005 already used. This is CB-EV-0005. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
163 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
163 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
# CB-EV-0005: did instrumenting the acceptance table change what it enforces?
|
||
|
||
research: [CB-RES-0004](../research/CB-RES-0004-replay-and-kernel-coverage.md)
|
||
adr: [ADR-0005](../decisions/ADR-0005-assertion-coverage-and-replay.md)
|
||
workplan: [CB-WP-0006](../workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md)
|
||
log: [260801-cb-wp-0006-log.md](../history/260801-cb-wp-0006-log.md)
|
||
instruments: `make mutation-check`, `make coverage`, `make cost-mix`
|
||
window: `cb-cost --since dfd0d6d` — 144 responses, **$51.52**
|
||
|
||
> **Numbering correction.** CB-WP-0006 T08 says "commit
|
||
> `evidence/CB-EV-0004`". That number was already taken by CB-WP-0005's
|
||
> evidence. This is **CB-EV-0005**.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Test 1 — did the enforced count rise, per row?
|
||
|
||
**M-D1-MUT: 4 of 14 → 8 of 14.**
|
||
|
||
| row | before | after | task |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| AM-1 | red | red | — |
|
||
| **AM-2** | unmutatable | **red** | T02 |
|
||
| AM-3 | unmutatable | unmutatable — **blocked**, artifact never built | T02 |
|
||
| AM-4a / AM-4b | red | red | — |
|
||
| AM-4c | unmutatable | unmutatable — **withdrawn**, retained in denominator | T04 |
|
||
| AM-5 | unmutatable | unmutatable — **measured and met**, spec declares it ungated | T03 |
|
||
| **AM-6** | unmutatable | **red** | T01 |
|
||
| AM-7 | PARTIAL 1/3 | PARTIAL **2/3** — `hash-identical` re-earned | T06 |
|
||
| AM-8 | PARTIAL 1/2 | PARTIAL 1/2 | — |
|
||
| **AM-9** | unmutatable | **red** | T03 |
|
||
| AM-10 | unmutatable | unmutatable — withdrawn | — |
|
||
| **AM-11** | unmutatable | **red** | T05 |
|
||
| AM-12 | red | red | — |
|
||
|
||
Per-task predictions, reported against what happened:
|
||
|
||
| task | predicted | measured |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| T01 AM-6 | `unmutatable` → `red` | **met** |
|
||
| T02 AM-2 | instrumented | **met** |
|
||
| T02 AM-3 | instrumented **or** restated | **restated** — blocked on an artifact, not a metric |
|
||
| T03 AM-9 | measured | **met** |
|
||
| T03 AM-5 | measured **or** withdrawn | **measured**, and the first reading was wrong (below) |
|
||
| T04 AM-4c | targeted **or** dropped | **dropped**, with the argument |
|
||
| T05 AM-11 | `unmutatable` → `red` | **met** |
|
||
| T06 K10 | replay real, AM-7 re-earnable | **met** — hash clause re-earned |
|
||
| T07 K14/K18 | implement **or** amend | **one of each** |
|
||
|
||
**The honest denominator, both ways.** 8 of 14 is 57%. But four rows
|
||
*cannot* be enforced — AM-3 is blocked on an artifact, AM-4c is withdrawn,
|
||
AM-5 is declared ungated by the spec, AM-10 is withdrawn — and two are
|
||
partial. Of the **10 enforceable** rows, **8 are enforced**.
|
||
|
||
The 14 stays the headline. AM-4c is deliberately retained in that
|
||
denominator after withdrawal, and the tool says so on every run: *a score
|
||
improved by deleting the question is not an improvement.*
|
||
|
||
**Kernel spec→code link: 15/18 → 18/18.** With the caveat the gate prints
|
||
every run: that is names, not assertions.
|
||
|
||
## Test 2 — did any row regress from `red` to `SURVIVED`?
|
||
|
||
**Yes, once, and it was caught.**
|
||
|
||
In T04, moving AM-6's gate from debug to release turned its mutation
|
||
`SURVIVED`. The 4,000 `black_box` iterations were calibrated against
|
||
debug's 3.4× headroom and are invisible against release's 20×. Raised to
|
||
100,000; back to `red`.
|
||
|
||
The generalizable finding: **a weak mutation is not a fixed property of a
|
||
row. It can become weak when the row's measurement conditions change** —
|
||
without the row, the mutation, or the code being touched. That is a
|
||
maintenance burden M-D1-MUT carries and T09 should weigh.
|
||
|
||
No other row regressed. `SURVIVED` count across the final run: **0**.
|
||
|
||
## Test 3 — were the new mutations strong?
|
||
|
||
The workplan required every new mutation to be *shown to fail for the
|
||
stated reason*. That is now **mechanical, not asserted**.
|
||
|
||
`mutation-check` gained an `EXPECT-VACUOUS` verdict: if a row's `expect`
|
||
string appears in **passing** output, the FA guard would accept any
|
||
failure at all, and the row is reported broken rather than `red`.
|
||
|
||
**Final run: 0 vacuous expects across all 14 rows.**
|
||
|
||
This control exists because the failure it detects happened. My first
|
||
`expect` for AM-2 was `"AM-2"` — which appears in the passing report, so
|
||
the guard would have accepted a compile error as proof the row was
|
||
enforced. Caught by hand in T02; caught mechanically from T08 onward.
|
||
|
||
Every mutation added this pass is a **property** mutation, not a threshold
|
||
tweak:
|
||
|
||
| row | mutation | expect |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| AM-6 | 100,000 `black_box` iterations in `GroundState::fold` | `AM-6 UNMET` |
|
||
| AM-2 | ~800 filler lines into the impl | `FAIL target <= 40` |
|
||
| AM-9 | a 300 MB allocation in the workload | `FAIL target <= 64 MB` |
|
||
| AM-11 | `NullRng::draw` returns its bound | `outside 0..` |
|
||
|
||
## What the instruments caught that nothing else would
|
||
|
||
Six defects, all found by a gate rather than by review:
|
||
|
||
1. **AM-6's gate measured contention, not throughput** — 38,753 ev/s
|
||
inside `make all` against 341,280 in isolation, because `cargo test`
|
||
runs concurrently.
|
||
2. **AM-5's first reading was wrong by 61%** — 87.0 s under load against
|
||
37.3 s quiet. Reported as a 45% breach; it is met with 1.6× headroom.
|
||
*Same error class as (1), committed two tasks later by the same author
|
||
in the row immediately after diagnosing it.*
|
||
3. **RSS over-reported 3×** — `getrusage(RUSAGE_CHILDREN)` is a
|
||
high-water mark across every reaped child, so `cargo`'s memory was
|
||
charged to the workload. Found only by cross-checking `/usr/bin/time`.
|
||
4. **K10's first round trip did not reproduce** — hashing a
|
||
`serde_json::Value` is a different canonical form than hashing the
|
||
typed aggregate. A round trip that recomputed its own comparison value
|
||
would have *passed* this.
|
||
5. **The bench workload existed twice** — `bench_shape` kept passing
|
||
while `bench-test` broke on the same edit.
|
||
6. **`facts-check` caught two spec copies going stale** within the hour
|
||
the numbers moved.
|
||
|
||
## Cost, and a regression that matters
|
||
|
||
| | CB-WP-0004 window | CB-WP-0005 | **CB-WP-0006** |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| pass cost | — | $16.03 | **$51.52** |
|
||
| responses | — | 83 | **144** |
|
||
| mechanical share | 26% | 38% | **50%** |
|
||
| environment setup | 3 turns | 0 | **0** |
|
||
| hub + workplan edits | 1 turn | 0 | **0** |
|
||
| ad-hoc text patching | 8 turns | 11 | **45 turns, $13.79** |
|
||
| orientation / inspect | 41 turns | 7 | **19 turns, $10.97** |
|
||
| mean context | — | 315,170 | **493,486** |
|
||
|
||
**Mechanical share rose to 50% — the highest ever recorded, above the 38%
|
||
baseline that motivated CB-WP-0004.** This is not a tooling regression:
|
||
environment setup and task closes are still at **zero**, two passes on.
|
||
It is the *other* half of CB-WP-0004 T06's finding arriving in force —
|
||
text patching and orientation never had their manual path removed, and a
|
||
code-heavy pass is exactly where that spends.
|
||
|
||
**Context is the sharper problem.** Mean 493,486 against a 200,000 target,
|
||
up from 315,170 last pass. `specs/SessionShape.md` has stated SS-01…SS-05
|
||
since CB-WP-0003 and **none of them has ever been enforced** — the only
|
||
acceptance-adjacent numbers in this project with no gate at all, in a pass
|
||
whose entire subject was ungated numbers.
|
||
|
||
## Verdict
|
||
|
||
| claim | status |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| enforced count rose | **confirmed** — 4 → 8 of 14, 8 of 10 enforceable |
|
||
| kernel link complete | **confirmed** — 18/18, names only |
|
||
| no row regressed to SURVIVED | **confirmed** — one near-miss, caught |
|
||
| new mutations are strong | **confirmed mechanically** — 0 vacuous expects |
|
||
| AM-3 instrumented | **not met** — blocked on an artifact, stated not hidden |
|
||
| AM-7, AM-8 fully enforced | **not met** — partial, reported as partial |
|
||
| the pass got cheaper | **refuted** — mechanical share rose to 50% |
|