tegwick
704b99975b
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
vendor tool that covers what the gate checks
They ruled on all seven items the same day. Two were actionable here.
F28 RULED: points. Modes.csv MODE_COOP clarified upstream to say
"penalties apply to points, not card count"; mastery is now
total - blame - denied. A recorded scenario went red on it --
gr-e02-shared-ground pinned 0 (2 claimed CARDS - 1 - 1) and now expects
2 (4 POINTS - 1 - 1). The number moved because the rule was decided, not
because the engine drifted, and the scenario records both rulings; its
schema has no field for a second one, so both live in ruled_note with
`ruled` carrying the LATEST date.
F29 RULED not-intended and APPLIED upstream: SCN_02's suits re-tuned the
same day. The characterisation test is how we found out -- it pinned the
duplication, went red on the re-tune, and that red WAS the notification.
It now asserts every pair distinct, the stronger statement the
duplication had made unavailable. SCN_02 re-measures at 73 at 2p, not
67: its own board now.
F26/F30 ruled and recorded. F30's ruling incidentally confirms our
reading -- they name priority-2's suit as the first lever, which is the
difference we identified without having measured causation.
vendor-editions grew twice, both times because it covered less than the
gate it exists to satisfy:
- It refused to touch ground-darvo-r0/ on the reasoning that the
baseline is "a separate record". That was wrong within the hour:
ground-game clarified Modes.csv and `make vendor` reported a clean
sync while edition-check went red. A sync tool that covers less than
its check reports success into a red gate.
- Its two-block rewrite DETECTED which fence held which set and
preserved the arrangement -- faithfully preserving a swap an earlier
write had introduced, leaving each fence under a heading describing
the other. edition-check reads every sha256 line flat and passed
throughout: a document can be self-consistently wrong and green.
Order is now asserted, with a control that goes red on a swap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
21 lines
6.9 KiB
CSV
21 lines
6.9 KiB
CSV
problem_id,scenario_id,visibility,stress_scope,hidden_priority,title,problem_text,required_solution,symbol_id,point_value,front_rules,reveal_effect,unresolved_effect,back_design_id
|
|
PRB_01_S,SCN_01,Surface,global,0,Deadline Missed,A promised result was not delivered when expected.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_01_1,SCN_01,Hidden,personal,1,Unclear Ownership,Responsibility for the commitment and the work was never made explicit.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_01_2,SCN_01,Hidden,personal,2,Unspoken Overload,The work required more capacity than someone could safely or fairly provide.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_01_3,SCN_01,Hidden,bond,3,Bad News Was Delayed,A warning was withheld until the remaining options became worse.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,3,Resolve with Repair. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_01_4,SCN_01,Hidden,personal,4,No Checkpoint Process,The group had no reliable moment for testing progress and changing course.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_S,SCN_02,Surface,global,0,Shared Task Left Undone,"A recurring responsibility was not completed, and others absorbed the impact.",Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_02_1,SCN_02,Hidden,personal,1,Different Standards,"Players were using different definitions of complete, timely, or fair.",Change,SYM_CHANGE,2,Resolve with Change. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_2,SCN_02,Hidden,personal,2,Invisible Workload,Some contributions and constraints were not visible to the group.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_3,SCN_02,Hidden,bond,3,Resentment Never Raised,Frustration accumulated without a direct request or acknowledgement.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_4,SCN_02,Hidden,personal,4,No Ownership Routine,The group relied on goodwill instead of a dependable allocation method.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,3,Resolve with Repair. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_S,SCN_03,Surface,global,0,Decision Announced as Settled,A group-affecting choice was presented as final before meaningful agreement.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_03_1,SCN_03,Hidden,personal,1,Mandate Was Ambiguous,"It was unclear who could decide, advise, consent, or veto.",Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_2,SCN_03,Hidden,personal,2,Contributions Were Dismissed,Relevant input was ignored or treated as less legitimate.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_3,SCN_03,Hidden,bond,3,One Voice Spoke for Others,A player claimed authority to represent people who had not agreed.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_4,SCN_03,Hidden,personal,4,No Decision Rule,The group had no shared method for turning discussion into a legitimate choice.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_S,SCN_04,Surface,global,0,Private Information Spread,Information moved beyond the circle in which it was originally shared.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_04_1,SCN_04,Hidden,personal,1,Confidentiality Was Assumed,The players never made the scope of confidentiality explicit.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_2,SCN_04,Hidden,personal,2,Exposure Caused Harm,"The sharing changed another player's safety, reputation, or freedom to choose.",Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_3,SCN_04,Hidden,bond,3,Consent Boundary Was Ignored,A clear or reasonably expected limit on sharing was crossed.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_4,SCN_04,Hidden,personal,4,No Sharing Protocol,"The group lacked a repeatable rule for consent, need-to-know, and escalation.",Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
|