clay-borg/workplans
tegwick b27aa14df0 CB-WP-0025 T04: specs/RetrospectiveAnalysis.md, and a benchmark that
caught me repeating C1

specs/RetrospectiveAnalysis.md v1.0 plus games/ground/benches/search.rs,
which exists because ADR-0013 D7 refused to let the spec quote either
disputed figure.

THE BENCHMARK'S OWN FIRST FIXTURE WAS DEFECTIVE, and it is the same defect
class the review caught one layer up. Stopping at a fixed step 20 put 2p
and 4p in states where seat 0 had NO legal commands, so it timed an empty
Vec (~120 ns) and silently skipped validate_fold because there was nothing
to validate. It now advances until the seat has a real branch and ASSERTS
it. A clone benchmark was added too: a search must copy state per branch,
and iter_batched excludes setup from timing, so without it the budget
would again rest on an unmeasured span.

Measured at real decision points: legal_commands 4.06-4.76 us, clone
378-639 ns, validate+fold 0.5-3.8 us. Per-child cost is NOT uniform --
some commands resolve cascades -- so budgets use the upper end (~5
us/child).

That settles D3 with real numbers. Joint branching over the last two
rounds is ~5x10^2 / 1.6x10^5 / 5.7x10^5 at 2/3/4 seats, so K=2 costs
negligible / 0.8 s / 2.9 s and holds at two to four seats. It does NOT
hold at five or six, where the tool must reduce K and say that it did
rather than silently searching less.

§4.1 is a normative prohibition, not a preference: a single policy's win
rate MAY NOT be reported as a difficulty. The spec carries the measured
reason -- greedy 100% against first-legal 0% on identical deals -- because
this project already made that error and nearly exported it to a repo that
is blocked waiting on the number.

§2.3 makes the empty-result wording normative: "no winning line found in
the last K rounds", never "unwinnable". A bounded search cannot establish
unwinnability and that sentence is what a player who just lost reads.

Also corrected: the T01 completion record still asserted all three
withdrawn claims as fact. It now carries claimed / withdrawn / survives
explicitly rather than being rewritten -- a retraction that does not
propagate to every place the claim lives is how the earlier ones survived.

make all: exit 0. loop-lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 18:59:46 +02:00
..
CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md CB-WP-0007 T01+T03: window the metric, budget it, cap meta at 25% 2026-08-01 14:12:07 +02:00
CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md CB-WP-0010-T01: close CB-WP-0007 2026-08-02 02:15:08 +02:00
CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md CB-WP-0008-T04: CB-EV-0007 — stage 0 is shipped, and the spend curve is a V 2026-08-01 15:25:19 +02:00
CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md CB-WP-0009-T04: CB-EV-0008 — the gate changes, measured 2026-08-01 15:45:08 +02:00
CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md CB-WP-0010-T03: record CommitWindow's second failed second-use 2026-08-02 02:19:23 +02:00
CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md CB-WP-0011-T03: evidence — the chaos roll fired, and it was right 2026-08-02 02:48:51 +02:00
CB-WP-0012-render-port.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0012 2026-08-02 04:30:45 +02:00
CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0013 2026-08-02 07:32:33 +02:00
CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0014 2026-08-02 07:59:28 +02:00
CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0015 2026-08-02 14:08:30 +02:00
CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0016 2026-08-02 20:49:21 +02:00
CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0017 2026-08-02 22:43:40 +02:00
CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md Sync hub IDs and work-record index for CB-WP-0018 2026-08-03 02:24:57 +02:00
CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md CB-WP-0019 T03/T04: the cost rule written down, and the lifecycle 2026-08-03 19:25:18 +02:00
CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md Sync hub state for CB-WP-0020 2026-08-03 20:21:18 +02:00
CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md CB-WP-0021 T04: evidence -- the endings are tight, and the cost chain snapped 2026-08-05 15:56:31 +02:00
CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md CB-WP-0022 T05/T06/T07: the register, and what its first run found 2026-08-05 15:22:33 +02:00
CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md CB-EV-0020: a gate moved the rule, and the report was wrong 2026-08-04 00:21:21 +02:00
CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md CB-WP-0024: the table you can watch 2026-08-05 17:32:48 +02:00
CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md CB-WP-0025 T04: specs/RetrospectiveAnalysis.md, and a benchmark that 2026-08-05 18:59:46 +02:00
CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md Sync hub state for CB-WP-0026 2026-08-05 16:15:22 +02:00