Obtain CR-000's first independent criticism via a freshly spawned,
context-isolated agent instance with no prior authorship context
(CR-000-X003-X007 in criticism.md). It found two internal-consistency
violations self-criticism had missed: CR-000-C006's cited evidence was
circular (X003) and conflated manuscript assertion with a real Evidence
object (X004), so C006 is now contested and its evidence withdrawn. It
also flagged that self-criticism had concentrated on infrastructure while
leaving substantive claims unchallenged (X005), an unlabeled overreach in
the Abstract (X006, now fixed), and a provenance-field ambiguity (X007).
Add evidence.md's first two entries (CR-000-E001, CR-000-E002), both
explicitly assessed as weak and left conjectural rather than inflated to
supported. Add scripts/query_paper_graph.py, a minimal read-only script
answering claim/evidence/criticism relation queries without manual
grepping, as a partial response to CR-000-X001 (which remains open: it is
a query layer over flat files, not a real graph).
Revise manuscript.md (Abstract, SS11-14) and questions.md to reflect all of
the above; Q2 gets a provisional "mixed" answer.
Close CR-WP-0004 and hand off CR-WP-0005 (resolving remaining open
criticism, and obtaining organizationally- rather than only
procedurally-independent review) rather than starting M3, which this
workplan judges premature while CR-000 still has open internal-consistency
findings.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 228422@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 49089735-86e1-4d29-8a6e-74c26947f8c4
Replace all [MISSING] sections in manuscript.md with real content
(motivation/problem framing, design objective, kernel presentation,
cybernetic loops, human-AI participation, publication interoperability,
decentralization, signals, failure modes, initial experiments, open
questions, conclusion, abstract). Add three new claims (CR-000-C006-C008).
Add two self-criticism entries (CR-000-X001, CR-000-X002): the
implementation is itself document-centric Markdown rather than a queryable
graph, contradicting CR-000-C002/C003 (now marked contested); and all
criticism received so far is self-authored, weakening the evidentiary
basis for CR-000-C004. Both are carried forward as residuals.
Close CR-WP-0003 and hand off M2 (claim/evidence discipline, independent
criticism, and a response to the document-centrism criticism) as
CR-WP-0004, per the workplan's residual-handoff requirement.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: claude-sonnet-5-5
Assistant-Process: 228422@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 49089735-86e1-4d29-8a6e-74c26947f8c4
Add docs/ResearchArtifactConvention.md defining program/paper/paper-local
identifier namespaces, file layout, publication metadata, and provenance
conventions. Register RP-000 (Researching Research) with CR-000 (Paper
Zero) as an honest draft skeleton: outline manuscript with explicit
[MISSING]/[CONJECTURE] markers, five conjectural claims transcribed from
the M2 example list, and empty evidence/criticism files. Add the
facility-level paper registry and a small validation script covering
registry parsing, id uniqueness, publication-metadata agreement, and
Markdown link integrity.
Close CR-WP-0002 and hand off M1 (Paper Zero v0.1 manuscript) as
CR-WP-0003, per the workplan's residual-handoff requirement.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 228422@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 49089735-86e1-4d29-8a6e-74c26947f8c4
