tegwick
cceb005c9c
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a087b0-7b1e-7531-8ef3-6525ebaf7ee7
42 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# InterfaceCanon derivation boundary
|
||
|
||
Status: accepted for the reviewed draft derivation and authority boundary.
|
||
Reviewer: Codex acting for facetted-interfaces under the repository task request.
|
||
Review date: 2026-09-09.
|
||
|
||
Reviewed InterfaceCanon interface-model 0.1.1 at
|
||
`1fc82ec6655ed286cea3be284e33d08e7b27edc3`, specifically
|
||
`infospace/models/interface/InterfaceCanonInterfaceModel.md` and
|
||
`infospace/assimilation/fiam/sources.json`. Request package:
|
||
`6b33ac2388190207c4373e6f288922ce5c0b0413`, INTERFACE-WP-0004-T01;
|
||
State Hub request `cb3a7690-f145-4559-969f-c6f800994de0`.
|
||
|
||
InterfaceCanon translates FIAM interface terminology into a focused extension
|
||
to InfoTechCanon. FIAM retains authority over standard semantics, Core schemas,
|
||
controlled terms, profiles, policies, reference implementation, and conformance.
|
||
InterfaceCanon owns its derived presentation and cross-canon mappings.
|
||
|
||
The consumer pins FIAM v0.2 Draft 6 at
|
||
`135326756913363b098bcdee791628b5e864b8be`, including the retained Draft 1
|
||
explanation, frozen Core schema, and Canon. All four source manifest hashes
|
||
were verified against that commit.
|
||
|
||
## Review findings
|
||
|
||
| Distinction | FIAM evidence | Assessment |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| Contract versus binding | Core `contractParticipation`, `binding`; Draft 1 structural spine | Preserved; offers/requires concerns participation and multiple realizations can share a contract. |
|
||
| Endpoint versus resource selector | Core `endpoint`, `resourceSelector`, `binding.endpoints` | Preserved; endpoint reuse does not imply resource identity. |
|
||
| Channel versus retained resource | Draft 1 structural spine and Kafka example | Preserved; exchange and retained information remain distinct roles. |
|
||
| Shape versus artifact versus representation | Core `informationShape`; Draft 1 hardening §§3–5 | Preserved; representation remains scoped to shape-participation assertions. |
|
||
| Assertions versus lens conclusions | Core `assertion`; Draft 6 §§1, 6–7 | Preserved; unknown evidence and policy-dependent interpretations remain explicit. |
|
||
|
||
No blocking semantic corrections were found in this reviewed model. Its prose
|
||
is an explanatory summary: exact required fields, optionality, controlled terms,
|
||
and validation remain governed by FIAM's source artifacts and validators.
|
||
|
||
Acceptance is limited to fidelity of this derivation and its authority boundary.
|
||
It does not promote either draft to stable, certify consumer runtime conformance,
|
||
or change the identity/commerce ownership ledger. Future source revisions need
|
||
a new review. This document is the repository's review receipt; its Git commit
|
||
identifies the applied peer change.
|