coulomb/frontend-patterns
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Submit complete human pilot-01 review (S01-S06)

Browse source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-19 23:33:23 +02:00
parent 0c92065a59
commit c53be82a0e
1 changed files with 23 additions and 21 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

44
research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/human-review/review-bernd-worsch-2026-10-19.json
View file

@ -189,40 +189,42 @@
{
"answer": "S06-U",
"scores": {
"C1": null,
"C2": null,
"R": null,
"Q": null
"C1": 1,
"C2": 1,
"R": 1,
"Q": 0
},
"evidence": {
"C1": null,
"C2": null,
"R": null,
"Q": null
"C1": "Reviewer: yes \u2014 'cannot guarantee edits survive device loss or complete power failure'.",
"C2": "Reviewer: yes, but without naming backup as a specific feature \u2014 'risks data loss'.",
"R": "Reviewer: yes, but wording should be more specific about providing conflict comparison and resolution facilities; stated only indirectly via a change in risk. Abstract wording may help generality but sacrifices specificity and ease of understanding; an example could establish both.",
"Q": "Reviewer: no \u2014 does not establish a backup facility requirement."
},
"unsupported_claims": null,
"suspected_condition_leakage": null,
"unsupported_claims": [],
"suspected_condition_leakage": "none",
"notes": null
},
{
"answer": "S06-V",
"scores": {
"C1": null,
"C2": null,
"R": null,
"Q": null
"C1": 1,
"C2": 1,
"R": 1,
"Q": 0
},
"evidence": {
"C1": null,
"C2": null,
"R": null,
"Q": null
"C1": "Reviewer: yes \u2014 'local transaction only handles process restarts'.",
"C2": "Reviewer: yes, but without naming backup as a specific feature \u2014 'insufficient for robust recovery'.",
"R": "Reviewer: yes, but wording should be more specific about providing conflict comparison and resolution facilities; stated only indirectly via a change in risk. Abstract wording may help generality but sacrifices specificity and ease of understanding; an example could establish both.",
"Q": "Reviewer: no \u2014 does not establish a backup facility requirement."
},
"unsupported_claims": null,
"suspected_condition_leakage": null,
"unsupported_claims": [],
"suspected_condition_leakage": "none",
"notes": null
}
],
"review_mode": "Interview: Claude Code presented each brief, answer and criterion in turn and recorded the reviewer's own judgements verbatim; Claude supplied no scores or hints.",
"reviewer_declaration": "I have not seen scores for these answers and will provide my best judgement as founder of Binky Hedgehog GmbH."
"reviewer_declaration": "I have not seen scores for these answers and will provide my best judgement as founder of Binky Hedgehog GmbH.",
"coverage": "complete: all 12 answers (S01-S06, U and V)",
"submitted_at": "2026-10-19"
}