tegwick
cfa249ab13
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
57 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# Local Draft State
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Keep a draft near the interaction while distinguishing it from committed data.
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Identity
|
|
|
|
P01; family affordance; scale L6; status draft; maturity hypothesis; evidence_kind synthetic.
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
An interrupted form session awaiting server acceptance.
|
|
|
|
## Problem
|
|
|
|
How can input remain intelligible before server confirmation?
|
|
|
|
## Forces
|
|
|
|
Interaction continuity improves; divergence-handling complexity increases.
|
|
|
|
## Solution
|
|
|
|
Hold a draft locally and display its uncommitted status.
|
|
|
|
## Dynamics
|
|
|
|
Submission may move from pending to rejected or accepted.
|
|
|
|
## Resulting Context
|
|
|
|
The application must decide retry, reconciliation and recovery behavior.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
The user can keep typing but must understand what has actually been saved.
|
|
|
|
## Failure Modes
|
|
|
|
Confusing a local draft with committed data; losing a draft on restart.
|
|
|
|
## Source Evidence
|
|
|
|
C01 and C02; source/source.md, Scenario and Trade-off, paragraph 1.
|
|
|
|
## Counterevidence
|
|
|
|
This synthetic scenario establishes neither recurrence nor durability.
|
|
|
|
## Review Notes
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis only. No known uses. Do not promote from fixture evidence.
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{"candidates": [{"id": "P01", "known_uses": [], "recurrence": "unknown"}]}
|
|
```
|