c161369ad5
source: repo-manager reason: deterministic projection registration Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
52 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0003
|
||
type: workplan
|
||
title: "Challenge the language across architectural schools"
|
||
domain: infotech
|
||
repo: frontend-patterns
|
||
status: proposed
|
||
owner: codex
|
||
topic_slug: canon
|
||
created: "2026-09-24"
|
||
updated: "2026-09-24"
|
||
state_hub_workstream_id: "13c123f1-a470-560e-ab8e-b270c387930a"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Challenge the language across architectural schools
|
||
|
||
Part of `research/plan/ResearchProgram.md`. Phase prerequisite: FEP-WP-0002's evidence
|
||
gate. This is planned follow-up, not an active background execution request.
|
||
Individual task descriptions identify any work that can start earlier.
|
||
|
||
## Compare the six research streams
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0003-T01
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
state_hub_task_id: "f7a7eea5-5055-545b-a957-55ee4d17a256"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Build a source coverage matrix for streams A–F in ResearchProgram.md. Complete a primary-source review for each stream, including disagreements and independent known uses. Q05 and Q06 guide the comparison; source counts alone do not establish coverage.
|
||
|
||
## Complete contrasting architecture walkthroughs
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0003-T02
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: high
|
||
state_hub_task_id: "05de53b6-1771-5137-9602-bf614cb1bf0a"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
After the M1 review, complete VC-03 through VC-06 using the walkthrough template. Mark coverage of VC-07 through VC-10 with evidence and gaps. Revise sequences and architecture decompositions where constraints break the current model.
|
||
|
||
## Review pattern and ontology changes
|
||
|
||
```task
|
||
id: FEP-WP-0003-T03
|
||
status: todo
|
||
priority: medium
|
||
state_hub_task_id: "2b7252c1-c453-5050-96fb-d86a3f3df0f0"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Record retain/merge/split/reject decisions, revised relations, quality constraints and counterexamples. Write research/reviews/M2-CoverageReview.md against the M2 gate; hand unresolved questions into live work records before closing.
|