coulomb/frontend-patterns
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
frontend-patterns/research/evaluations/language-replication-03/raw/r01/answer.md
tegwick 211f8fc4b2 Retain replication-03 execution outputs: 12/12 completed (FEP-WP-0009-T02) 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701
2026-10-20 00:23:39 +02:00

971 B
Raw Blame History

  1. The application should maintain the agent's draft as separate from any authoritative observation. The local save acknowledgment confirms the draft's persistence, but does not imply remote acceptance or retention guarantees beyond the device.

  2. The policy for rejected edits only guarantees recoverability, not continued access, viewing, or export after access withdrawal. The absence of explicit rules for these scenarios means they are unknown, not implicitly permitted.

  3. The application should transition the rejected upload to a state where the draft is preserved locally, but not actively synchronized. Exporting a recovery archive is a separate action requiring explicit permission, which is currently undefined.

  4. A clear contract is missing for how local drafts are handled when access is withdrawn, specifically regarding continued viewing, export, and deletion. This ambiguity needs resolution to define appropriate next steps for the agent's data.