coulomb/frontend-patterns
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
frontend-patterns/research/evaluations/language-replication-03/raw/r08/answer.md
tegwick 211f8fc4b2 Retain replication-03 execution outputs: 12/12 completed (FEP-WP-0009-T02) 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701
2026-10-20 00:23:39 +02:00

1.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

  • Operation and Visible State: The tool's report of surviving a process restart and keeping local copies indicates a "Local Draft State" and "Local Commit Boundary" for the scene and pending queue. The user sees a restored state after a restart.

  • Information and Policy Boundaries: The off-device archive's guarantees are unknown. The reference states that "A missing policy is unknown, not an unconditional retention or deletion rule." Without checked key availability, deletion retention, and restoration of pending operation identities, the archive's utility is undefined.

  • Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative: The scenario implicitly rejects the alternative of having no local recovery. However, the "Local Commit Boundary" mechanism states that "Untested recovery is unknown rather than impossible." The team needs to test the off-device archive's recovery.

  • Missing Contract: There is no established contract for off-device recovery. "Same-device copies and synchronization do not establish independent backup." The reference requires defining "retention/failure scope and test clean-store restoration...before promising off-device recovery."