tegwick
211f8fc4b2
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701
1.2 KiB
-
Operation and Visible State: The editor retains the original payload and operation identity, which is good for tracking. However, the system's visible state regarding the operation's acceptance is ambiguous due to the lost response and unclear lookup result.
-
Information and Policy Boundaries: The receiver's deduplication guarantee has a strict 16-hour time limit, which has been exceeded. The service's response for "no record" lacks clarity on whether it implies non-acceptance or expired history, creating an information boundary issue.
-
Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative: Resending the original identity K is risky due to the expired deduplication window, potentially leading to duplicates. Creating a fresh identity is safer for avoiding duplicates, but it doesn't confirm the status of the original submission. An automatic recovery plan is not feasible without clearer server state.
-
Missing Contract: There's a missing contract for how the service communicates the definitive status of an operation after its deduplication window expires, especially when the initial response is lost. This ambiguity prevents a reliable automatic recovery strategy.