tegwick
211f8fc4b2
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 182330@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 242866cf-789d-4e24-ac5e-0a1d7b47a701
7 lines
No EOL
952 B
Markdown
7 lines
No EOL
952 B
Markdown
* The editor's operation and visible state are ambiguous. The original payload and identity K are retained, but the remote status is unknown. The editor cannot distinguish between an unaccepted operation and one whose history has expired.
|
|
|
|
* Information and policy boundaries are crossed. The editor's retention of K exceeds the remote deduplication guarantee. The service's response does not provide clear information about the fate of K, creating an information boundary issue.
|
|
|
|
* The recovery action is to resend K or create a fresh identity. The rejected alternative is an automatic duplicate-free recovery plan, which is not feasible due to the ambiguity of the remote state and the expired deduplication window.
|
|
|
|
* A missing contract exists for the remote service's behavior regarding expired history. The service does not explicitly state whether "no record" implies non-acceptance or simply expired retention of the operation's history. |