tegwick
cfa249ab13
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
71 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# Pattern Candidate Catalog
|
|
|
|
This file tracks concepts before promotion into canonical pattern files.
|
|
|
|
| Candidate | Family | Scale | Status | Main force |
|
|
|---|---|---:|---|---|
|
|
| Server Authority | authority | L2 | seed | authoritative consistency |
|
|
| Local Authority | authority | L2 | seed | offline usability |
|
|
| Replicated Authority | authority | L2 | seed | collaborative concurrency |
|
|
| URL as Application State | address | L3 | seed | addressability |
|
|
| Server Projection | projection | L3 | seed | client compute / delivery |
|
|
| Client Projection | projection | L3 | seed | interaction locality |
|
|
| Streaming Projection | projection | L3 | seed | first-content latency |
|
|
| Islands of Interactivity | projection | L3 | seed | client execution cost |
|
|
| Local Interaction State | affordance | L6 | seed | responsiveness |
|
|
| Optimistic Overlay | affordance | L6 | seed | interaction latency |
|
|
| Invalidate and Reproject | synchronization | L3/L6 | seed | freshness |
|
|
| Persistent Subscription | synchronization | L3 | seed | update latency |
|
|
| Vertical Feature Slice | composition | L4 | seed | change locality |
|
|
| Independent Feature Boundary | composition | L4 | seed | team autonomy |
|
|
| Progressive Enhancement | quality | cross-scale | seed | resilience/accessibility |
|
|
| Failure Boundary | quality | L5/L6 | seed | fault containment |
|
|
|
|
`seed` means "worth researching", not "accepted into the canon".
|
|
|
|
|
|
## First investigation dispositions — 2026-09-24
|
|
|
|
See [AuthorityPilot](../reviews/AuthorityPilot.md). These are manual source-review
|
|
outcomes, not successful bench extraction or canonical admission.
|
|
|
|
| Candidate | Evidence reference | Disposition / question |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Server Authority | SRC-0001, Carniato review C01 | Retain; identify precisely which data and decisions it governs |
|
|
| Immediate Feedback | SRC-0001, Carniato review C02 | Add seed; feedback should distinguish tentative from durable/accepted state |
|
|
| Local Authority | SRC-0002, local-first review C01 | Retain; test primary ownership versus cache behavior |
|
|
| Scoped Authority | Cross-source interpretation in AuthorityPilot | Defer new pattern; may belong in context requirements instead |
|
|
|
|
No recurrence, established maturity, known uses or required dependency edges are
|
|
claimed by these dispositions. Other seed candidates remain unassessed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-25: the completed local-first `-06` investigation found no pattern justified
|
|
by its single-fragment packet. Local Authority remains a manual seed hypothesis;
|
|
no generated candidate IDs or relations were admitted. The missing evidence is
|
|
persistence, concurrency, recovery and located independent uses. See
|
|
[editorial review](../reviews/TruncationDiagnosis.md).
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Located conflict-handling uses — 2026-09-25
|
|
|
|
[Conflict Copy](../candidates/ConflictCopy.md) is a new research draft (synchronization,
|
|
L2/L6, hypothesis). It merges the Joplin and Obsidian workspace P01 candidates.
|
|
Two independently published application guides document the narrow mechanism;
|
|
no runtime tests or universal no-loss guarantee. Invalid generated requires edges
|
|
were rejected. See [evidence/dispositions](../reviews/LocalFirstEvidenceExpansion.md).
|
|
|
|
The expanded evidence also refines Local Authority: local persistence, remote-version
|
|
selection, semantic resolution and backup are separate concerns. A primary local
|
|
copy does not make every local edit globally authoritative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Application-driven drafts — 2026-09-25
|
|
|
|
[VC-02](../walkthroughs/VC02-OfflineFieldNotes.md) connects Conflict Copy with three
|
|
new hypothesis research drafts: [Local Commit Boundary](../candidates/LocalCommitBoundary.md),
|
|
[Pending Synchronization](../candidates/PendingSynchronization.md), and
|
|
[Explicit Reconciliation](../candidates/ExplicitReconciliation.md). Their exact
|
|
transaction/retry/UI contracts are proposed, not inferred implementation guarantees.
|
|
No FEP IDs or canonical edges. Test whether Explicit Reconciliation deserves a
|
|
separate pattern; full admission remains open.
|