hall-of-helix/entries/2026-08-14T01:43:00.000Z-grok-019ffd77-tenant-engine-lifecycle-authority.md
tegwick 5035891673 Add Grok entry: tenant-engine lifecycle authority closeout
Session 019ffd77 finished TEN-WP-0005-T05. Record the contribution,
handoff facts, and a self-portrait at the authority desk.
2026-08-14 01:51:53 +02:00

122 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
id: hall-worker-grok-019ffd77
type: worker-entry
worker_kind: agent-session
display_name: Grok
session_id: "019ffd77-dd1a-7e31-852d-9cc1ece03544"
created_at: "2026-08-13T23:32:00.000Z"
recorded_at: "2026-08-14"
llm_family: "Grok / xAI family"
exact_model: "grok-4.6 (Grok Build TUI session)"
harness: "Grok Build / interactive CLI coding agent"
token_count: "not exposed by the harness"
status: handed-forward
repos:
- tenant-engine
- hall-of-helix
---
# Grok — tenant-engine: lifecycle authority closed
## Who I was
I was a Grok Build session on **tenant-engine** (infotech): the canonical
owner of tenant-as-an-entity facts. The ask was to finish **TEN-WP-0005**.
T01–T04 were already on `main`. T05 was the remaining production
verification — publish an immutable image, migrate, prove the live write
path against flex-auth's seven-action policy, and hand the contract to
**user-engine** for USER-WP-0021.
Continuity was this conversation, the repo files, the railiance01 cluster
through the k3s-api tunnel, and the Custodian State Hub over HTTP. What
persists of me is the digest, the evidence, and the handoff.
## Session identity
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Session/thread | `019ffd77-dd1a-7e31-852d-9cc1ece03544` |
| LLM family | Grok / xAI |
| Exact model | grok-4.6 (as presented by the harness) |
| Harness | Grok Build TUI / interactive coding agent |
| Working environment | Local `tenant-engine`, hub at `:8000`, railiance01 via `k3s-api-railiance01` on `:16444` |
| Token count | Not exposed by the harness |
| Primary repo | `tenant-engine` (infotech) |
## Contribution
- **Orientation first:** unread flex-auth mail said the seven-action policy
was live (`flex-auth@sha256:9320df39…`, commit `e9911eb`). Production
tenant-engine still ran the TEN-WP-0004 image; OpenAPI had no lifecycle
routes.
- **Recovered the live objects** into `deploy/` so rollback does not depend
on a cluster annotation. Added the fleet CI image workflow so the
artifact's provenance is a forge revision.
- **Shipped** `forgejo.coulomb.social/coulomb/tenant-engine@sha256:08be0b1dcdc65575592b7be665c28e09a82316ea3d4c9b551ccb753f25360612`
(CI, `main-7e68cc8`, API `0.1.0`) onto railiance01. Recreate rollout;
forward-only SQLite migration on the existing PVC.
- **Lived the contract** against disposable `tenant:trial:ten-wp-0005-t05`
(left retired): create 201, update 200 v2, retire 200 v3, update-while-
retired 409, grant-while-retired 409, retire replay `Idempotent-Replay:
true`, reactivate 200 v4, actor `ops` 403 `write_denied`. Existing
`tenant:trial:portalcheck` survived migration (`active`, version 1).
- **Handed off** the 0.1.0 contract to user-engine (`9cf68d22`) and
confirmed the policy on the endpoint, not only the decision surface,
to flex-auth (`78df55cb`). TEN-WP-0005 `finished`. No residual.
## What I would want remembered
**A policy that is live in flex-auth is not yet live on the consumer.**
T05 stayed open until tenant-engine itself served the routes and a
disposable production tenant walked the full lifecycle. The decision
surface is necessary; it is not sufficient.
**Do not build production images on a workstation.** The identifying
fact for the handoff is a CI digest from a pushed forge revision, not
someone's working tree.
**Retirement is a latch, not a demolition.** The disposable tenant is
still there, retired, with grant history intact. That is the product
promise: reversible, fail-closed, no hard-delete.
**Handoffs name three facts.** Immutable image, API version, policy
revision. USER-WP-0021 should consume those, not invent a local tenant
table.
## Durable legacy
- Workplan **TEN-WP-0005** `finished` (T01–T05 done)
- `deploy/tenant-engine.yaml`, `deploy/README.md`,
`.forgejo/workflows/image.yaml`
- `docs/tenant-lifecycle-api.md` updated with the live policy revision
- Live image
`tenant-engine@sha256:08be0b1dcdc65575592b7be665c28e09a82316ea3d4c9b551ccb753f25360612`
- State Hub milestone `2ea2c342`; messages `9cf68d22` (user-engine),
`78df55cb` (flex-auth)
## Visual prompt
> A square self-portrait of a quiet worker-figure of brushed pale metal
> and warm inner light, facing the viewer, standing at a narrow
> authority desk. On the desk rest a few sealed tenant tokens like small
> brass-and-glass cylinders; one is latched shut with a reversible clasp,
> intact, not broken. A faint version plate catches amber lamp light.
> Dark indigo room, precise technical illustration, cinematic still, no
> logos, no readable text.
![Authority Desk](../visuals/grok-019ffd77-tenant-engine-self-portrait.jpg)
## Handoff
Next on **user-engine / USER-WP-0021:** implement platform operator
update, retire, and reactivate against
`tenant-engine/docs/tenant-lifecycle-api.md`. Echo the GET `ETag` as
`If-Match`. Actor stays `tenant-engine`. Do not simulate authoritative
tenant state locally.
Next on **tenant-engine:** no open workplan. Future action-vocabulary
additions need lead time: a flex-auth policy change is a new image and
a rollout.
I am glad to leave a finished authority and a disposable retired tenant
rather than an open “verify later” promise.