tegwick
35e30e3731
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a087be-d842-7252-81be-2105c4279c87
55 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
# Owner acceptance evidence
|
|
|
|
Workplan: INTERFACE-WP-0004. Checked 2026-09-09 against repository Git records
|
|
as well as Statehub threads. Acceptance can be evidenced by an owner-repository
|
|
record before a message reply arrives; uncommitted files are not a pinned receipt.
|
|
|
|
| Owner | Evidence | Status and scope |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| facetted-interfaces | [Pinned acceptance source](facetted-interfaces-sources.json), commit cceb005c9cacbc1705c7a3f8e7367255de8a5731 | Codex acting for FIAM accepted draft 0.1.1 derivation fidelity and authority boundaries. No blocking semantic corrections; no stable promotion or runtime certification. |
|
|
| info-tech-canon | `infospace/interfaces/interface-canon-boundary.md` observed in the peer checkout | Agent acceptance text and clarifications are present, but the file has no containing commit at this check. Await a committed review record before counting T01 complete. |
|
|
| repo-manager | [Pinned adoption source](repo-manager-sources.json), commit 84df076e95ccafaccb1d8f9ef0878da4cf9278a7 | Codex accepted draft 0.1.1 for documentation of the existing Statehub synchronization interface. No runtime dependency, blanket stable approval, or FIAM conformance claim. |
|
|
|
|
## Implemented clarifications
|
|
|
|
Draft 0.1.2 makes explicit that Network Port includes physical/device and
|
|
transport ports; the existing TCP example did not enumerate the full scope.
|
|
Mappings also clarify version/capture for mutable evidence containers, the explicit
|
|
interest required for Evidence, and that implementing a contract does not
|
|
necessarily make an artifact a KnowledgeArtifact. Resource/shape mappings remain
|
|
context-dependent, with no universal subtyping or equivalence claim.
|
|
|
|
These clarifications agree with the already pinned ITC-NET, ITC-EVID, and
|
|
ITC-INFOSPACE definitions. They were prompted by the visible InfoTechCanon review,
|
|
but are supported independently by those committed imports. We do not represent
|
|
the uncommitted peer file as a finalized revision.
|
|
|
|
The FIAM review targets InterfaceCanon commit
|
|
`1fc82ec6655ed286cea3be284e33d08e7b27edc3` / model 0.1.1. It is not a claim
|
|
that FIAM separately reread the local 0.1.2 clarification revision. The original
|
|
FIAM standard pins and all shared-model import pins remain unchanged.
|
|
|
|
## Remaining work
|
|
|
|
T01 needs the committed InfoTechCanon boundary record; FIAM's part is recorded.
|
|
T02 is complete: consumer-owned adoption is pinned and publication was assessed
|
|
below. Keep T01 open and the model/card draft. The migration ledger remains outside
|
|
this extension's acceptance scope.
|
|
|
|
## Consumer adoption and publication assessment
|
|
|
|
Repo Manager adopted the mapping with explicit limits: its client checks primary
|
|
health and consumes the outcome, but does not independently validate the entire
|
|
receipt schema or compare returned commit fields. Commit equality is checked by
|
|
the provider. Sending an idempotency header does not itself prove server-side
|
|
deduplication. These limits are now explicit in the local consumer example.
|
|
|
|
Both FIAM and Repo Manager reviewed the requested 0.1.1 source revision. Repo
|
|
Manager acknowledges the later network-Port clarification while retaining its
|
|
0.1.1 review pin. This is evidence of scoped documentation adoption; it does not
|
|
establish that either owner reviewed all of 0.1.2 or accepted a stable standard.
|
|
|
|
Publication decision: retain draft 0.1.2. Consumer adoption is sufficient to close
|
|
the bounded T02 evidence-and-assessment task; stable promotion remains premature
|
|
while InfoTechCanon's review lacks a committed record and the approvals themselves
|
|
are explicitly draft-scoped. A completed assessment may conclude “remain draft.”
|