key-cape/src/internal/server/oidc/token.go

494 lines
16 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package oidc
import (
"crypto"
"crypto/rand"
"crypto/rsa"
"crypto/sha256"
"crypto/subtle"
"encoding/base64"
"encoding/json"
"net/http"
"net/url"
"strings"
"time"
2026-07-24 00:18:17 +02:00
"keycape/internal/adapters/tenantengine"
"keycape/internal/domain"
profileerrors "keycape/internal/errors"
"keycape/internal/server/telemetry"
)
// TokenHandler implements POST /token.
type TokenHandler struct {
ClientConfig map[string]*domain.Client
Sessions *SessionStore
Users domain.UserRepository
KEY-WP-0005-T01: IAM Profile core claims for the human PKCE flow Verified first: grant_types_supported advertises client_credentials in discovery.go, but token.go only ever accepted authorization_code -- no service-token issuance path exists at all. Building one from scratch is materially bigger than extending the existing flow; explicitly not attempted here, left open in the workplan rather than declared done. What shipped for the human Authorization Code + PKCE flow: - domain.User.Tenant (new, omitempty) + token.go's effectiveTenant(): falls back to tenant:coulomb (this workstation's actual tenant, ADR-0006) when unset -- never an empty tenant claim, never a silent reassignment. - principal_type: "human", unconditional. - groups/roles promoted from scope-gated to unconditional core claims, always [] not null when empty. One pre-existing test asserted the old scope-gated groups behavior -- updated to match the new intentional behavior, not left failing or reverted. - assurance built from PKCESession.MFAVerified (new field, threaded through completeAuthorization's two call sites in authorize.go) -- whether MFA was actually verified in this session, not static enrollment state. aal2 only when required-and-passed this time, aal1 otherwise. go build/vet clean, go test ./... green repo-wide. Two new authorize_test.go cases assert MFAVerified on both paths. tests/profile/profile_test.go's TestCompleteTokenFlow (the repo's own full HTTP integration test) extended with real value assertions for all five claims, not just presence checks. Python conformance tool not run against a live instance (needs the full Authelia+LLDAP+privacyIDEA stack); TestCompleteTokenFlow's real HTTP round trip covers the equivalent claim checks instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 00:03:31 +02:00
SigningKey *rsa.PrivateKey
Issuer string
TokenLifetime time.Duration
Emitter telemetry.Emitter
2026-07-24 00:18:17 +02:00
// TenantEngine sources the optional tenant_roles claim (KEY-WP-0005-T02).
// Nil disables it entirely -- token issuance never depends on it.
TenantEngine *tenantengine.Client
}
// tokenResponse is the JSON body returned on a successful token exchange.
type tokenResponse struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int `json:"expires_in"`
IDToken string `json:"id_token,omitempty"`
}
// ServeHTTP handles POST /token.
func (h *TokenHandler) ServeHTTP(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
ctx := r.Context()
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
http.Error(w, "invalid form body", http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
grantType := r.FormValue("grant_type")
if grantType == "client_credentials" {
h.serveClientCredentials(w, r)
return
}
clientID := r.FormValue("client_id")
code := r.FormValue("code")
codeVerifier := r.FormValue("code_verifier")
// 1. Validate grant_type.
if grantType != "authorization_code" {
profileerrors.FeatureNotSupported(
"only grant_type=authorization_code is supported",
"grant_type="+grantType,
).Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
Harden the authorization-code grant and UserInfo verification Closes the local protocol surface of gap G01 from the scope assessment (KEY-WP-0016). The browser grant validated PKCE, client id and scopes but left four bindings unenforced, and UserInfo verified less than the caller CLI does. Authorization-code path: bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was issued for, refuse clients whose registration does not permit the grant, and authenticate confidential clients with a digest-based constant-time comparison over the same credential sources as the service grant. An empty grantTypes stays an implicit authorization-code client, matching config validation. Code consumption: SessionStore.Consume reads and deletes under one lock. The previous Get/Delete pair spanned JWT signing, and the added test reproduces the race against that version -- 9 of 16 concurrent exchanges succeeded, and a failed exchange left the code replayable. UserInfo: check the JOSE header algorithm before trusting the signature, require the configured issuer, and require an access token rather than accepting an ID token of the right shape. Purpose is decided on the scope claim so the issued token contract, which consumers pin exactly, does not change. SCOPE.md and the assessment record which bindings are now enforced and that the Authelia upstream-trust assumption remains open, so G01 is not fully closed and no profile-conformance claim is made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
2026-09-06 22:43:47 +02:00
// 2. Validate client exists and may use this grant.
client, ok := h.ClientConfig[clientID]
if !ok {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("unknown client_id", "client_id").
Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
Harden the authorization-code grant and UserInfo verification Closes the local protocol surface of gap G01 from the scope assessment (KEY-WP-0016). The browser grant validated PKCE, client id and scopes but left four bindings unenforced, and UserInfo verified less than the caller CLI does. Authorization-code path: bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was issued for, refuse clients whose registration does not permit the grant, and authenticate confidential clients with a digest-based constant-time comparison over the same credential sources as the service grant. An empty grantTypes stays an implicit authorization-code client, matching config validation. Code consumption: SessionStore.Consume reads and deletes under one lock. The previous Get/Delete pair spanned JWT signing, and the added test reproduces the race against that version -- 9 of 16 concurrent exchanges succeeded, and a failed exchange left the code replayable. UserInfo: check the JOSE header algorithm before trusting the signature, require the configured issuer, and require an access token rather than accepting an ID token of the right shape. Purpose is decided on the scope claim so the issued token contract, which consumers pin exactly, does not change. SCOPE.md and the assessment record which bindings are now enforced and that the Authelia upstream-trust assumption remains open, so G01 is not fully closed and no profile-conformance claim is made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
2026-09-06 22:43:47 +02:00
// Grant-type eligibility, enforced equivalently to the service path
// (KEY-WP-0016-T02). An empty grantTypes is an implicit authorization-code
// client, matching config validation; a client_credentials-only client must
// not reach the browser path.
if len(client.GrantTypes) > 0 && !containsString(client.GrantTypes, "authorization_code") {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
"client is not registered for grant_type=authorization_code",
"grant_type",
).Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
// Confidential authorization-code clients authenticate with their secret,
// using the same credential sources as the service grant. A public client
// must not be able to present a secret and be treated as authenticated.
if client.ClientType == "confidential" {
presentedID, secret, ok := basicClientCredentials(r)
if !ok || presentedID != clientID || client.ClientSecret == "" ||
!secretsEqual(secret, client.ClientSecret) {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
"client authentication failed",
"Authorization",
).Write(w, http.StatusUnauthorized)
return
}
}
// 3. Consume the PKCE session. Single-use and atomic: see
// SessionStore.Consume (KEY-WP-0016-T01).
sess, ok := h.Sessions.Consume(code)
if !ok {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
"authorization code not found or expired",
"code",
).Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
// Verify client_id matches the session.
if sess.ClientID != clientID {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
"client_id does not match the authorization code",
"client_id",
).Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
Harden the authorization-code grant and UserInfo verification Closes the local protocol surface of gap G01 from the scope assessment (KEY-WP-0016). The browser grant validated PKCE, client id and scopes but left four bindings unenforced, and UserInfo verified less than the caller CLI does. Authorization-code path: bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was issued for, refuse clients whose registration does not permit the grant, and authenticate confidential clients with a digest-based constant-time comparison over the same credential sources as the service grant. An empty grantTypes stays an implicit authorization-code client, matching config validation. Code consumption: SessionStore.Consume reads and deletes under one lock. The previous Get/Delete pair spanned JWT signing, and the added test reproduces the race against that version -- 9 of 16 concurrent exchanges succeeded, and a failed exchange left the code replayable. UserInfo: check the JOSE header algorithm before trusting the signature, require the configured issuer, and require an access token rather than accepting an ID token of the right shape. Purpose is decided on the scope claim so the issued token contract, which consumers pin exactly, does not change. SCOPE.md and the assessment record which bindings are now enforced and that the Authelia upstream-trust assumption remains open, so G01 is not fully closed and no profile-conformance claim is made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
2026-09-06 22:43:47 +02:00
// Bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was issued for
// (RFC 6749 section 4.1.3, KEY-WP-0016-T02). /authorize always records an
// exactly-matched registered redirect, so the parameter is always required
// here and must be identical.
if redirectURI := r.FormValue("redirect_uri"); redirectURI != sess.RedirectURI {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
"redirect_uri does not match the authorization request",
"redirect_uri",
).Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
// Recheck grants in case the client registration changed after authorization.
for _, scope := range sess.Scopes {
if !containsString(h.ClientConfig[clientID].AllowedScopes, scope) {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("requested scope is not allowed", "scope").Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
}
// 4. Verify PKCE code_verifier.
if !verifyPKCE(codeVerifier, sess.PKCEChallenge) {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage(
"code_verifier does not match code_challenge",
"code_verifier",
).Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
// 5. Look up user.
user, err := h.Users.LookupUser(ctx, sess.Username)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "user not found", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
2026-07-28 01:23:22 +02:00
if isSuspended(user) {
profileerrors.RejectedForSafety(
"account is suspended",
"account_lifecycle",
).Write(w, http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
// 6. Build JWT claims.
now := time.Now()
exp := now.Add(h.TokenLifetime)
claims := map[string]interface{}{
"iss": h.Issuer,
"sub": user.ID,
"aud": clientID,
"exp": exp.Unix(),
"iat": now.Unix(),
}
if sess.Nonce != "" {
claims["nonce"] = sess.Nonce
}
scopeSet := make(map[string]bool)
for _, s := range sess.Scopes {
scopeSet[s] = true
}
if scopeSet["profile"] {
claims["preferred_username"] = user.Username
}
if scopeSet["email"] {
claims["email"] = user.Email
}
KEY-WP-0005-T01: IAM Profile core claims for the human PKCE flow Verified first: grant_types_supported advertises client_credentials in discovery.go, but token.go only ever accepted authorization_code -- no service-token issuance path exists at all. Building one from scratch is materially bigger than extending the existing flow; explicitly not attempted here, left open in the workplan rather than declared done. What shipped for the human Authorization Code + PKCE flow: - domain.User.Tenant (new, omitempty) + token.go's effectiveTenant(): falls back to tenant:coulomb (this workstation's actual tenant, ADR-0006) when unset -- never an empty tenant claim, never a silent reassignment. - principal_type: "human", unconditional. - groups/roles promoted from scope-gated to unconditional core claims, always [] not null when empty. One pre-existing test asserted the old scope-gated groups behavior -- updated to match the new intentional behavior, not left failing or reverted. - assurance built from PKCESession.MFAVerified (new field, threaded through completeAuthorization's two call sites in authorize.go) -- whether MFA was actually verified in this session, not static enrollment state. aal2 only when required-and-passed this time, aal1 otherwise. go build/vet clean, go test ./... green repo-wide. Two new authorize_test.go cases assert MFAVerified on both paths. tests/profile/profile_test.go's TestCompleteTokenFlow (the repo's own full HTTP integration test) extended with real value assertions for all five claims, not just presence checks. Python conformance tool not run against a live instance (needs the full Authelia+LLDAP+privacyIDEA stack); TestCompleteTokenFlow's real HTTP round trip covers the equivalent claim checks instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 00:03:31 +02:00
// Core claims required by net-kingdom/canon/standards/iam-profile_v0.3.md
// for every production token -- not scope-gated, unlike the recommended
// human claims above (KEY-WP-0005-T01).
2026-07-24 00:18:17 +02:00
tenant := effectiveTenant(user)
claims["tenant"] = tenant
KEY-WP-0005-T01: IAM Profile core claims for the human PKCE flow Verified first: grant_types_supported advertises client_credentials in discovery.go, but token.go only ever accepted authorization_code -- no service-token issuance path exists at all. Building one from scratch is materially bigger than extending the existing flow; explicitly not attempted here, left open in the workplan rather than declared done. What shipped for the human Authorization Code + PKCE flow: - domain.User.Tenant (new, omitempty) + token.go's effectiveTenant(): falls back to tenant:coulomb (this workstation's actual tenant, ADR-0006) when unset -- never an empty tenant claim, never a silent reassignment. - principal_type: "human", unconditional. - groups/roles promoted from scope-gated to unconditional core claims, always [] not null when empty. One pre-existing test asserted the old scope-gated groups behavior -- updated to match the new intentional behavior, not left failing or reverted. - assurance built from PKCESession.MFAVerified (new field, threaded through completeAuthorization's two call sites in authorize.go) -- whether MFA was actually verified in this session, not static enrollment state. aal2 only when required-and-passed this time, aal1 otherwise. go build/vet clean, go test ./... green repo-wide. Two new authorize_test.go cases assert MFAVerified on both paths. tests/profile/profile_test.go's TestCompleteTokenFlow (the repo's own full HTTP integration test) extended with real value assertions for all five claims, not just presence checks. Python conformance tool not run against a live instance (needs the full Authelia+LLDAP+privacyIDEA stack); TestCompleteTokenFlow's real HTTP round trip covers the equivalent claim checks instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 00:03:31 +02:00
claims["principal_type"] = "human"
claims["groups"] = nonNilStrings(user.Groups)
claims["roles"] = nonNilStrings(user.Roles)
claims["assurance"] = assuranceClaim(sess.MFAVerified, now)
2026-07-24 00:18:17 +02:00
// Optional cached tenant_roles claim (KEY-WP-0005-T02). Fails open --
// see internal/adapters/tenantengine's package doc for why this is the
// one place in the whole tenant_roles design where that's correct.
if roles, ok := h.TenantEngine.Roles(ctx, tenant); ok {
claims["tenant_roles"] = roles
}
// 7. Sign JWT with RSA-SHA256.
kid := "key-1" // static kid for v0.1
jwtToken, err := buildJWT(claims, kid, h.SigningKey)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "failed to build JWT", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
// Access tokens target the statically registered resource server. ID tokens
// remain bound to the OIDC relying party.
if audience := h.ClientConfig[clientID].Audience; audience != "" {
claims["aud"] = audience
}
claims["scope"] = strings.Join(sess.Scopes, " ")
accessToken, err := buildJWT(claims, kid, h.SigningKey)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "failed to build JWT", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
Harden the authorization-code grant and UserInfo verification Closes the local protocol surface of gap G01 from the scope assessment (KEY-WP-0016). The browser grant validated PKCE, client id and scopes but left four bindings unenforced, and UserInfo verified less than the caller CLI does. Authorization-code path: bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was issued for, refuse clients whose registration does not permit the grant, and authenticate confidential clients with a digest-based constant-time comparison over the same credential sources as the service grant. An empty grantTypes stays an implicit authorization-code client, matching config validation. Code consumption: SessionStore.Consume reads and deletes under one lock. The previous Get/Delete pair spanned JWT signing, and the added test reproduces the race against that version -- 9 of 16 concurrent exchanges succeeded, and a failed exchange left the code replayable. UserInfo: check the JOSE header algorithm before trusting the signature, require the configured issuer, and require an access token rather than accepting an ID token of the right shape. Purpose is decided on the scope claim so the issued token contract, which consumers pin exactly, does not change. SCOPE.md and the assessment record which bindings are now enforced and that the Authelia upstream-trust assumption remains open, so G01 is not fully closed and no profile-conformance claim is made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
2026-09-06 22:43:47 +02:00
// 8. Build response. The session was already consumed at lookup, so no
// separate replay-prevention delete is needed here.
resp := tokenResponse{
AccessToken: accessToken,
TokenType: "Bearer",
ExpiresIn: int(h.TokenLifetime.Seconds()),
IDToken: jwtToken,
}
// 10. Emit token_issued telemetry.
h.Emitter.Emit(ctx, telemetry.Event{
Timestamp: time.Now(),
EventType: telemetry.EventTokenIssued,
ClientID: clientID,
Endpoint: "/token",
Result: "success",
Scopes: sess.Scopes,
GrantType: grantType,
})
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)
_ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(resp)
}
Harden the authorization-code grant and UserInfo verification Closes the local protocol surface of gap G01 from the scope assessment (KEY-WP-0016). The browser grant validated PKCE, client id and scopes but left four bindings unenforced, and UserInfo verified less than the caller CLI does. Authorization-code path: bind the exchange to the redirect URI the code was issued for, refuse clients whose registration does not permit the grant, and authenticate confidential clients with a digest-based constant-time comparison over the same credential sources as the service grant. An empty grantTypes stays an implicit authorization-code client, matching config validation. Code consumption: SessionStore.Consume reads and deletes under one lock. The previous Get/Delete pair spanned JWT signing, and the added test reproduces the race against that version -- 9 of 16 concurrent exchanges succeeded, and a failed exchange left the code replayable. UserInfo: check the JOSE header algorithm before trusting the signature, require the configured issuer, and require an access token rather than accepting an ID token of the right shape. Purpose is decided on the scope claim so the issued token contract, which consumers pin exactly, does not change. SCOPE.md and the assessment record which bindings are now enforced and that the Authelia upstream-trust assumption remains open, so G01 is not fully closed and no profile-conformance claim is made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NV9oijZukGyGbRQGGKnK4P Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 713576@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 384c511d-9bce-4cb8-a676-2aef6c0c8df6
2026-09-06 22:43:47 +02:00
// basicClientCredentials reads client_secret_basic credentials, applying the
// form-encoding decode RFC 6749 appendix B requires of both halves. Shared by
// the service grant and confidential authorization-code client authentication.
func basicClientCredentials(r *http.Request) (clientID, clientSecret string, ok bool) {
clientID, clientSecret, ok = r.BasicAuth()
if !ok {
return "", "", false
}
decodedID, idErr := url.QueryUnescape(clientID)
decodedSecret, secretErr := url.QueryUnescape(clientSecret)
if idErr != nil || secretErr != nil {
return "", "", false
}
return decodedID, decodedSecret, true
}
// secretsEqual compares two secrets in constant time. Digesting first keeps the
// comparison length-independent, so a wrong-length secret is indistinguishable
// from a wrong-value one.
func secretsEqual(presented, expected string) bool {
presentedDigest := sha256.Sum256([]byte(presented))
expectedDigest := sha256.Sum256([]byte(expected))
return subtle.ConstantTimeCompare(presentedDigest[:], expectedDigest[:]) == 1
}
func (h *TokenHandler) serveClientCredentials(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
ctx := r.Context()
clientID, clientSecret, ok := r.BasicAuth()
if !ok {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("client_secret_basic authentication required", "Authorization").
Write(w, http.StatusUnauthorized)
return
}
clientID, idErr := url.QueryUnescape(clientID)
clientSecret, secretErr := url.QueryUnescape(clientSecret)
if idErr != nil || secretErr != nil {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("invalid client authentication encoding", "Authorization").Write(w, http.StatusUnauthorized)
return
}
client, ok := h.ClientConfig[clientID]
if !ok || client.ClientType != "confidential" || !containsString(client.GrantTypes, "client_credentials") {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("invalid confidential client", "client_id").
Write(w, http.StatusUnauthorized)
return
}
presentedDigest := sha256.Sum256([]byte(clientSecret))
expectedDigest := sha256.Sum256([]byte(client.ClientSecret))
if client.ClientSecret == "" ||
subtle.ConstantTimeCompare(presentedDigest[:], expectedDigest[:]) != 1 {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("invalid client authentication", "Authorization").
Write(w, http.StatusUnauthorized)
return
}
requestedScopes := strings.Fields(r.FormValue("scope"))
if len(requestedScopes) == 0 {
requestedScopes = append([]string(nil), client.AllowedScopes...)
}
for _, scope := range requestedScopes {
if !containsString(client.AllowedScopes, scope) {
profileerrors.InvalidProfileUsage("requested scope is not allowed", "scope").
Write(w, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
}
now := time.Now()
tokenLifetime := h.TokenLifetime
if client.TokenLifetime > 0 {
tokenLifetime = client.TokenLifetime
}
claims := map[string]interface{}{
"iss": h.Issuer,
"sub": client.ServiceSubject,
"aud": accessAudience(client),
"exp": now.Add(tokenLifetime).Unix(),
"iat": now.Unix(),
"tenant": client.Tenant,
"principal_type": "service",
"groups": []string{},
"roles": nonNilStrings(client.Roles),
"scope": strings.Join(requestedScopes, " "),
"assurance": map[string]interface{}{
"level": "aal1", "methods": []string{"client_secret"},
"mfa": false, "source": "key-cape", "at": now.Unix(),
},
}
if roles, ok := h.TenantEngine.Roles(ctx, client.Tenant); ok {
claims["tenant_roles"] = roles
}
jwtToken, err := buildJWT(claims, "key-1", h.SigningKey)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "failed to build JWT", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
h.Emitter.Emit(ctx, telemetry.Event{
Timestamp: now, EventType: telemetry.EventTokenIssued, ClientID: clientID,
Endpoint: "/token", Result: "success", Scopes: requestedScopes,
GrantType: "client_credentials",
})
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)
_ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(tokenResponse{
AccessToken: jwtToken, TokenType: "Bearer",
ExpiresIn: int(tokenLifetime.Seconds()),
})
}
func containsString(values []string, wanted string) bool {
for _, value := range values {
if value == wanted {
return true
}
}
return false
}
2026-07-28 01:23:22 +02:00
func isSuspended(user *domain.User) bool {
return containsString(user.Groups, "netkingdom-suspended")
}
KEY-WP-0005-T01: IAM Profile core claims for the human PKCE flow Verified first: grant_types_supported advertises client_credentials in discovery.go, but token.go only ever accepted authorization_code -- no service-token issuance path exists at all. Building one from scratch is materially bigger than extending the existing flow; explicitly not attempted here, left open in the workplan rather than declared done. What shipped for the human Authorization Code + PKCE flow: - domain.User.Tenant (new, omitempty) + token.go's effectiveTenant(): falls back to tenant:coulomb (this workstation's actual tenant, ADR-0006) when unset -- never an empty tenant claim, never a silent reassignment. - principal_type: "human", unconditional. - groups/roles promoted from scope-gated to unconditional core claims, always [] not null when empty. One pre-existing test asserted the old scope-gated groups behavior -- updated to match the new intentional behavior, not left failing or reverted. - assurance built from PKCESession.MFAVerified (new field, threaded through completeAuthorization's two call sites in authorize.go) -- whether MFA was actually verified in this session, not static enrollment state. aal2 only when required-and-passed this time, aal1 otherwise. go build/vet clean, go test ./... green repo-wide. Two new authorize_test.go cases assert MFAVerified on both paths. tests/profile/profile_test.go's TestCompleteTokenFlow (the repo's own full HTTP integration test) extended with real value assertions for all five claims, not just presence checks. Python conformance tool not run against a live instance (needs the full Authelia+LLDAP+privacyIDEA stack); TestCompleteTokenFlow's real HTTP round trip covers the equivalent claim checks instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 00:03:31 +02:00
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// IAM Profile core claims (KEY-WP-0005-T01)
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// defaultTenant is the fallback tenant claim for users with no explicit
// Tenant assignment yet. This workstation currently operates a single
// tenant (tenant:coulomb, ADR-0006); later tenants (e.g. tenant:friendly:binky,
// ADR-0013) require an explicit domain.User.Tenant value -- this default
// never silently assigns a user to a tenant other than the platform's
// original one.
const defaultTenant = "tenant:coulomb"
// effectiveTenant resolves the tenant claim for a user, falling back to
// defaultTenant when the user has no explicit tenant assignment. The IAM
// Profile requires a non-empty tenant claim on every token.
func effectiveTenant(user *domain.User) string {
if user.Tenant != "" {
return user.Tenant
}
return defaultTenant
}
// nonNilStrings returns s, or an empty (non-nil) slice if s is nil, so the
// claim always serializes as `[]`, never `null` -- the profile requires
// groups/roles to be present, "possibly empty", not absent.
func nonNilStrings(s []string) []string {
if s == nil {
return []string{}
}
return s
}
// assuranceClaim builds the profile's `assurance` object from whether MFA
// was actually verified during this authorization (session.MFAVerified),
// not from static enrollment state -- a user who has MFA enrolled but
// wasn't challenged for it in this particular flow gets aal1, not aal2.
func assuranceClaim(mfaVerified bool, at time.Time) map[string]interface{} {
level := "aal1"
methods := []string{"pwd"}
if mfaVerified {
level = "aal2"
methods = append(methods, "otp")
}
return map[string]interface{}{
"level": level,
"methods": methods,
"mfa": mfaVerified,
"source": "key-cape",
"at": at.Unix(),
}
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// PKCE verification
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// verifyPKCE checks BASE64URL(SHA256(verifier)) == challenge (S256 method).
func verifyPKCE(verifier, challenge string) bool {
h := sha256.New()
h.Write([]byte(verifier))
computed := base64.RawURLEncoding.EncodeToString(h.Sum(nil))
return computed == challenge
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
// JWT construction (stdlib only — no external JWT library)
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
type jwtHeader struct {
Alg string `json:"alg"`
Typ string `json:"typ"`
Kid string `json:"kid"`
}
// buildJWT constructs and signs a JWT using RSA-SHA256 with the standard library.
// Format: base64url(header) + "." + base64url(payload) + "." + base64url(signature)
func buildJWT(claims map[string]interface{}, kid string, key *rsa.PrivateKey) (string, error) {
// Header.
hdr := jwtHeader{Alg: "RS256", Typ: "JWT", Kid: kid}
hdrJSON, err := json.Marshal(hdr)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
hdrB64 := base64.RawURLEncoding.EncodeToString(hdrJSON)
// Payload.
payloadJSON, err := json.Marshal(claims)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
payloadB64 := base64.RawURLEncoding.EncodeToString(payloadJSON)
// Signing input.
signingInput := hdrB64 + "." + payloadB64
// Digest.
digest := sha256.Sum256([]byte(signingInput))
// Sign with PKCS1v15 / SHA256.
sig, err := rsa.SignPKCS1v15(rand.Reader, key, crypto.SHA256, digest[:])
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
sigB64 := base64.RawURLEncoding.EncodeToString(sig)
return strings.Join([]string{hdrB64, payloadB64, sigB64}, "."), nil
}
// accessAudience is configured by the issuer, never selected by request input.
func accessAudience(client *domain.Client) string {
if client.Audience != "" {
return client.Audience
}
return client.ClientID
}