tegwick
5a8a5a2d2d
- SCOPE.md now reflects Phases I-IX complete, paper draft with decided pathway, companion line, and metrics groundwork; current work surface and sharpened out-of-scope table - history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md assesses state against INTENT's six determinations and success criterion; gap register G1-G7, ranking G1 (sufficiency/weighting), G2 (coverage matrix), G3 (Soul packaging) as most relevant addressable gaps - SOUL-WP-0011 opened to address G1-G3 (three tasks) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: sonnet Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6
3.2 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | origin | origin_ref | owner | topic_slug | priority | created | updated | depends_on | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOUL-WP-0011 | workplan | Phase X — Sufficiency/weighting position, success-criterion coverage matrix, and Soul packaging | agents | soul-frame | active | assessment | history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md | claude | soul-frame | medium | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-28 |
|
SOUL-WP-0011 — Phase X: Sufficiency, Coverage, and Soul Packaging
Goal
Close the three gaps the 2026-09-28 scope-vs-intent assessment
(history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md) ranked as most relevant
and addressable now:
- G1 — the framework has no stated position on weighting/sufficiency for its B-, P-, and continuity profiles, though thresholds are load-bearing in Beinghood v0.2 and across the TE catalog.
- G2 — INTENT's success criterion (one vocabulary across nine reference entity types, with meaningful distinctions) has never been exercised as an explicit test.
- G3 — Soul packaging (relations vs consequences vs both) is the last remaining paper-critical open item (RQ4).
Tasks
T01 — Sufficiency and weighting position paper
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T01
status: todo
priority: high
Write research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md: a principled
position on how (or whether) B1–B8, P1–P12, and the six continuity
channels aggregate into sufficiency judgments ("enough personhood for
Beinghood v0.2", "CONTINUOUS vs DEGRADED"). A principled refusal of
universal weights (context-of-claim relativity) is an acceptable outcome
if argued; silence is not. Must state consequences for Beinghood v0.2
phrasing and the TE working judgments that lean on thresholds.
Done when: the note exists, takes one defended position, and
OpenQuestions.md RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets reference it.
T02 — Success-criterion coverage matrix
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T02
status: todo
priority: high
Write research/coverage-matrix.md: apply the full vocabulary (B-profile,
P-profile, continuity channels, addressability/recognition,
Agent/Sp./Gh. descriptors) to all nine INTENT reference entity types in
one matrix, with per-entity notes on where the vocabulary strains.
Distinctions must be meaningful: every pair of entity types must differ
on at least one dimension, stated explicitly or derivable from the matrix.
Done when: the matrix covers all nine types, strain points are named,
and the note gives an explicit pass/partial verdict on the success
criterion, cross-referenced from INTENT.md's success-criterion section
readers via SCOPE.md.
T03 — Soul packaging resolution
id: SOUL-WP-0011-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
Resolve RQ4's remainder: does "Soul" package relations, consequences
(persistent influence), or both — and how does Cluster D inheritance
(Gh. inheriting Soul-relational structure without identity) survive the
chosen packaging? Update concepts/soul.md with the outcome and mark the
RQ4 remainder resolved or narrowed in OpenQuestions.md.
Done when: concepts/soul.md states the packaging position with
rationale, and RQ4's "still open (paper-critical)" block reflects it.