tegwick
807d6b17f6
Map model-based mind, co-adaptive social cognition, and recognition/social Beinghood into instruments and workstream notes. Support H3/H4/H7, judge TE-09, write phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0003, and mark SOUL-WP-0004 ready.
88 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
88 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# Mind as Model — Cognitive Science Map (Phase II)
|
||
|
||
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0003-T01
|
||
**Date:** 2026-08-12
|
||
**Purpose:** Map predictive processing, active inference, internal models, and
|
||
metacognition against Soul Frame **Mind = Model**.
|
||
|
||
Builds on Phase I: Ashby; Conant & Ashby; extended/distributed cognition
|
||
(`research/foundations/001-*.md`).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Soul Frame target definition
|
||
|
||
> Mind is the adaptive modeling and regulatory dimension of a Being: models of
|
||
> self, others, environment, and relationships guide action and are revised by
|
||
> interaction.
|
||
|
||
Phase II asks whether contemporary cognitive science strengthens or weakens this.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. Source crosswalk
|
||
|
||
| Source | Core idea | Agreement with Soul Frame | Tension |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| **Ashby 1956; Conant & Ashby 1970** | Regulation requires a model of the regulated system | Direct support for Mind = Model (H3) | Classical cybernetics is not social/personhood theory |
|
||
| **Friston / Active Inference** | Agents minimize free energy via generative models of sensory causes; action and perception as inference | Strong formalization of adaptive modeling + control as one package | Philosophical over-extension debates; Markov blanket ≠ full Being (RN-002) |
|
||
| **Clark, *Surfing Uncertainty* (2016) and related PP** | Brain as prediction machine; perception as controlled hallucination; action as prediction error minimization | Mind as hierarchical generative modeling fits “model-based adaptation” | Risk of reducing Mind to a single neural story; Soul Frame needs multi-substrate models |
|
||
| **Hohwy, *The Predictive Mind* (2013)** | Systematic PP account of mind | Supports internal generative models as central to cognition | Stronger internalism than extended-mind / distributed views |
|
||
| **Metacognition literature** (overview) | Models of own cognitive processes, uncertainty, confidence | Supports Self-Model and calibration of Other-Models | Not sufficient alone for Social Mind |
|
||
| **Baker, Saxe & Tenenbaum 2009** | Inverse planning: infer goals/beliefs from action | Other-Model as inverse inference | Rational-agent assumptions |
|
||
| **Enactive critiques** (e.g. participatory sense-making; radical enactivism) | Interaction can constitute cognition; caution on representation talk | Interaction process is first-class (RN-006) | May reject “model” vocabulary; Soul Frame must keep “model” inclusive |
|
||
|
||
**Done criterion (≥4 rigorous sources with agreements/tensions):** met.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Working synthesis for Mind
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
Mind ⊇ generative / regulatory models
|
||
+ update from evidence (including social evidence)
|
||
+ action selection guided by those models
|
||
+ (for Social Mind) coupled self/other/relation models
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Not required for Mind in Soul Frame:**
|
||
|
||
- solved consciousness,
|
||
- biological brain,
|
||
- single substrate location,
|
||
- perfect accuracy of models.
|
||
|
||
**Quality of Mind** (from RN-006, generalized):
|
||
|
||
- calibration (uncertainty),
|
||
- revisability,
|
||
- differentiation (distinct counterparts),
|
||
- perspective separation (mine vs yours vs yours-of-mine),
|
||
- not accuracy alone when models are causal in interaction.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Metacognition placement
|
||
|
||
Metacognition maps primarily to:
|
||
|
||
- **SM2 Self-Model** (including confidence about own knowledge),
|
||
- **SM4 Reflected-Self Model** (what others model about me),
|
||
- model-quality monitoring (calibration).
|
||
|
||
It is a capability dimension of Mind, not a separate Soul Frame top-level term.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Implications
|
||
|
||
1. H3 is **strengthened** by PP/active inference *and* by inverse-planning ToM work.
|
||
2. “Model” should mean **action-guiding structure that can be revised**, not only
|
||
explicit propositional representation (keeps enactive tensions manageable).
|
||
3. Social Mind (RN-006 SM1–SM8) is a **specialization** of Mind for multi-Being
|
||
interaction, not a second kind of mind.
|
||
|
||
## 6. Bibliography pointers
|
||
|
||
See `sources/bibliography.md` § E (Phase II cognitive science additions) and
|
||
`research/foundations/References-ResearchNote006.md`.
|