tegwick
2da19a49b7
ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move. The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS, with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects). GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do. gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails. Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied three ways and asserted nothing. BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition 0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log. Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
21 lines
5.3 KiB
CSV
21 lines
5.3 KiB
CSV
problem_id,scenario_id,visibility,hidden_priority,title,problem_text,required_solution,symbol_id,point_value,front_rules,reveal_effect,unresolved_effect,back_design_id
|
|
PRB_01_S,SCN_01,Surface,0,Deadline Missed,A promised result was not delivered when expected.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_01_1,SCN_01,Hidden,1,Unclear Ownership,Responsibility for the commitment and the work was never made explicit.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_01_2,SCN_01,Hidden,2,Unspoken Overload,The work required more capacity than someone could safely or fairly provide.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_01_3,SCN_01,Hidden,3,Bad News Was Delayed,A warning was withheld until the remaining options became worse.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,3,Resolve with Repair. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_01_4,SCN_01,Hidden,4,No Checkpoint Process,The group had no reliable moment for testing progress and changing course.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_S,SCN_02,Surface,0,Shared Task Left Undone,"A recurring responsibility was not completed, and others absorbed the impact.",Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_02_1,SCN_02,Hidden,1,Different Standards,"Players were using different definitions of complete, timely, or fair.",Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_2,SCN_02,Hidden,2,Invisible Workload,Some contributions and constraints were not visible to the group.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_3,SCN_02,Hidden,3,Resentment Never Raised,Frustration accumulated without a direct request or acknowledgement.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,3,Resolve with Repair. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_02_4,SCN_02,Hidden,4,No Ownership Routine,The group relied on goodwill instead of a dependable allocation method.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_S,SCN_03,Surface,0,Decision Announced as Settled,A group-affecting choice was presented as final before meaningful agreement.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_03_1,SCN_03,Hidden,1,Mandate Was Ambiguous,"It was unclear who could decide, advise, consent, or veto.",Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_2,SCN_03,Hidden,2,Contributions Were Dismissed,Relevant input was ignored or treated as less legitimate.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_3,SCN_03,Hidden,3,One Voice Spoke for Others,A player claimed authority to represent people who had not agreed.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_03_4,SCN_03,Hidden,4,No Decision Rule,The group had no shared method for turning discussion into a legitimate choice.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_S,SCN_04,Surface,0,Private Information Spread,Information moved beyond the circle in which it was originally shared.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
|
|
PRB_04_1,SCN_04,Hidden,1,Confidentiality Was Assumed,The players never made the scope of confidentiality explicit.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_2,SCN_04,Hidden,2,Exposure Caused Harm,"The sharing changed another player's safety, reputation, or freedom to choose.",Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_3,SCN_04,Hidden,3,Consent Boundary Was Ignored,A clear or reasonably expected limit on sharing was crossed.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|
|
PRB_04_4,SCN_04,Hidden,4,No Sharing Protocol,"The group lacked a repeatable rule for consent, need-to-know, and escalation.",Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,No card-specific effect; it simply remains unsolved.,BACK_PROBLEM
|